Postby Steeler [Crawler2] » Sat Oct 27, 2007 4:08 am
"And the US Constitution doesn't tell people 'exactly' how to implement laws but it provides a framework for rules, doesn't it? Prophet (pbuh) concerned himself with overarching themes and advice as most general and applicable as possible, not with minutiae that would only be relevant to .01% of the people. The simplicitly with which he spoke also ensured that the people of the time could understand it as well as later generations being able to abstract greater meaning and depth from it."
Which is fine. But then don't claim perfection (like Ahab the Arab likes to do) when, in fact, it's not even complete. It's just so much bullshit it's focking laughable. Obviously not perfect, if you can't tell me how leaders are selected according to the Prophet. Or was that a "detail"?
"....besides sterilization of surgery equipment is not some miraculous advancement of logic......it's an eventual conclusion any reasonable person would reach as their experience and knowledge advance. But, the emphasis on hygiene/cleanliness to the point where it is associated with good faith, now that's a very abstract concept and it manifests itself in a person taking hygiene/cleanliness seriously in all facets of their life."
Again, fine. But then don't claim Mohammed told us everything we need to know, because he didn't.
"If Bill Gates is helping the poor that's fine and noble..........but he is also pushing a sterilization agenda:
Promotion of abortion rights and contraception
Some social conservatives also criticize the foundation for its support of organizations that promote abortion rights and contraception, including the International Planned Parenthood Federation, Guttmacher Institute, the United Nations Population Fund and the World Health Organization."
And that's his right. He pushes his, you push yours. And if you are as smart and clever as Bill Gates, and learn how to make billions, you will have more influence in pushing your agenda. As if there were something wrong with that. What, he's rich so he's not allowed to have an agenda? Or is being rich and then helping charities push things you think are important bad? Focked up thinking.