Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators
Combatting Terrorism CenterReligious leaders play a critical role in attracting youth to the movement,
providing religious justification for violence, and determining its overall
strategic direction. But this cuts both ways, as non‐jihadi religious leaders
are able to siphon off support from the movement and challenge its
legitimacy.
The United States should very carefully and unobtrusively support Muslim
religious leaders and movements that can effectively compete with the
jihadi movement in terms of mass appeal and popularity among the youth.
Naturally, many of the most effective competitors will not be friendly to the
United States and the West; but if the bottom line is a rejection of violence
against the United States and its allies, they should be supported.
The difficulty comes in identifying the right leader or group. The U.S. could
discretely fund mainstream Salafi figures like Madkhali who are effective in
siphoning off support from jihadis and who do not advocate violence (e.g.
by paying for publications, lectures, new schools). This will be effective in
the short term, but it further strengthens the dehumanizing Salafi ideology
from which the jihadi movement derives much of its inspiration. The U.S.
could also fund non‐Salafis, but it currently lacks the expertise necessary to
determine who is truly influential. Perhaps a better strategy in the near
term would be to pressure Middle Eastern governments to allow greater
political participation and visibility for groups that jihadis are threatened
by. This approach should vary from country to country. For example, in
Egypt, it would be the Muslim Brotherhood; in Saudi Arabia, the Shi’a.
Again, it is essential that the U.S. hand not be seen.
JK. wallahi this is spot on. may allah reward you for it.Neo-salafis aka madkhalis are part of international war against islam. Kuffar are using them through their puppet-rulers of muslim lands, whose scholars these ignorants blind-follow. Madkhalis are playing their part in most devastating and effective war, the ideological one.
They are defending rulers who allow kuffar to wage war against islam and muslims in every single way, and not only allow, but they assist in it in every way they can: Kill mujahidin, arrest and hand them over, arrest imams and du'at, forbidding teaching about anything that is related to islam that affects society, replacing parts of islam that kuffar don't like etc. The reason why rulers do this, is because they are 100% dependent on kuffar and they are trying to hold on in power because their kursi is more important to them than anything in this world including religion. They are doing many things that negate one's islam by ijmac, like completely replacing Allah's law, helping kuffar against muslims etc. But because irjaa of neo-salafis, no-one (from the rulers) is non-muslim unless he says from his mouth that he does kufr only because he hates islam and loves kufr. Before that it's haram to say anything against him or oppose him. But of course this is only related to rulers; normal muslims from the streets are boycotted and insulted because of smallest of reasons.
Kuffar know this and they are using neo-salafis as their tools. This is what they are writing:
Combatting Terrorism CenterReligious leaders play a critical role in attracting youth to the movement,
providing religious justification for violence, and determining its overall
strategic direction. But this cuts both ways, as non‐jihadi religious leaders
are able to siphon off support from the movement and challenge its
legitimacy.
The United States should very carefully and unobtrusively support Muslim
religious leaders and movements that can effectively compete with the
jihadi movement in terms of mass appeal and popularity among the youth.
Naturally, many of the most effective competitors will not be friendly to the
United States and the West; but if the bottom line is a rejection of violence
against the United States and its allies, they should be supported.
The difficulty comes in identifying the right leader or group. The U.S. could
discretely fund mainstream Salafi figures like Madkhali who are effective in
siphoning off support from jihadis and who do not advocate violence (e.g.
by paying for publications, lectures, new schools). This will be effective in
the short term, but it further strengthens the dehumanizing Salafi ideology
from which the jihadi movement derives much of its inspiration. The U.S.
could also fund non‐Salafis, but it currently lacks the expertise necessary to
determine who is truly influential. Perhaps a better strategy in the near
term would be to pressure Middle Eastern governments to allow greater
political participation and visibility for groups that jihadis are threatened
by. This approach should vary from country to country. For example, in
Egypt, it would be the Muslim Brotherhood; in Saudi Arabia, the Shi’a.
Again, it is essential that the U.S. hand not be seen.
http://ctc.usma.edu/publications/publications.asp
From Stealing Al-Qaida's playbook
Intentionally or unintentionally, madkhalis are firmly taking part in coalition that's ONLY PURPOSE is to eradicate everything about islam that surpasses the limits of secularism.
anyway...other night in the masjid when shiek falaax ismacil (the salafis would know who he is) came down to birmingham and gave a talk in the salafi masjid the abu khadija masjid (for the dumb ones who know nothing what they talking about i.e alklem08) he sat down in front of a large crowd, the shiek is mashallah, is one of the students of ibn baz and other ulmaah of the past and he is in a late stage of his age at this present time, the sheik knows of what goes on in the UK in terms of the da3wa al salafiya, of all its faults and short comings and he does what he can to advise the youth the way of the salaf but they choose the big brother style of salafiya where they evict or vote somone out of the salafiya every other day, so today you with us tomoro youv been voted out and your of the manhaaj and you are warned againts and pdfs and youtube warnings and refutations are made againts you..
anyway..back to the topic in hand..the shiek began with talking to the SOMALI'S, HE STARTED MENTIONING WHAT WE HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT IN THIS THREAD WHICH IS THE SOMALI SISTERS WHO HAVE CHEAPEND THEMSELFS, THE SHIEK SAID THAT GETING MARRIED ON THE CHEAP WILL ONLY CHEAPIN YOUR EXIST, HE SAID GETING MARRIED FOR THE PRICE OF A PEPSI (EVERYONE LAUGHED EXCPT THE SISTERS WHO GOT MARRIED WITH THE PRICE TAG OF A PEPSI,MAYBE THEY SHOULD OF AT LEAST GONE UP TO A QUID) THE SHIEK..continued and began talking out of wisdom, because thats what shuyuuk do...he began mentioning how women are the corner stone of the ummah...and how they are the first madrasah and everything else that is to come from the ummah comes from women..he didnt want to go on the attack but wanted to build up the self esteem and confidence of the somali sisters who have formed 99p marriage store...then someone said walahi if that was a somali brother asking the sister she would of said £5000 for the meher just because he;s ajnaabi and she wants to proof her salafiyaah she goes for the 99p meher....
anyway..thats the situation of our sisters in Birmingham..Cardiff...Sheffield...London (which i hear the price of meher has gone up to £1.34 now days due to inflation going up aswell in London) when a big shiek who came from abroad knows of the condition of our sisters..yet we have idiots on this site denying it and accusing us of being anti salaf..no we anti the stupidty of the sisters and those who just open up their mouth without having any prior knowledge of whats going on...am sure this will continue
Return to “General - General Discussions”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests