Isaaq Historian Xplaya deservers a Medal for his work

[Khalid Ali]

I have not seen an isaaq man as energetic working towards correcting past historical mistakes made by previous Somali historians who have constantly distort historic records. I dont think he gets much credit for it he has done some academic research particularly for the dervish history, And i think that is his specialty , i have seen a few isaaq other historians a man called diiriye who lives in Sweden who is also well versed on this there are only a few isaaq men like how Xplaya conducted his work, all his work are all based references and are all sourced bit by bit.I have known Xplaya close to a decade and in that decade he was busy with this research on the dervish history , it sad that many isaaq do not value history it hold the identity of our past which our people can learn allot from. We are looking forward to read his book as it published soon. And i believe the Somaliland government should honer him with a medal because he has done research on this particular history of the dervishes. So we should give credit where its due.

[NewHargeisaGirl]

Subhanallah why are you giving a medal to a Murtad? for what reason other than insulting qabilo somali ah muslim ah...shame on you Emperior

[Kukri]

There are plenty of Isaq historians that are correcting "past historical mistakes" (if those past mistakes you are talking about are the ones made by the kacaan in regards to qabiil).

I will give credit where its due without prejudice and xplayer deserves his fair share of credits but i have to say his past doesn't do him any favours. This is a man who was know for his hate towards daarood (not that he is alone in that regards) but as far as history of Isaq and daarood is concerned some might say he lacks intellectual integrity.

As far as the history of the dervish is concerned, i think its a tragedy when the only sources we use and bicker over is the ones found in the books written by cadaans. I know they have kept records of the going on in that time and what they have witnessed and heard, but who's to say if those records are bias? Isn't the records and sources we are using written by another finite that can be guilty of prejudice? Whos to say if the source of a particular historian at time was based purely on interest, or he favoured one clan over another?

This questions are what i asked myself after reading xplayers research on the Dervish. I mean since its history and we are to believe that its fact then we should read things with an open heart and mind, and when the man behind the book am reading has a checkered past then i have to read carefully and always be mindful of the possibility that everything is not what they seem.

My two sumuni.

[NewHargeisaGirl]

Kukri
dis moi donc qu'est-que tu penses Xplayer? je veux vraiment savoir la verite habo...je pense que tu l'adore parce que il est pede comme toi et ton pere

[Kukri]

je veux vraiment savoir la verite habo

ok.

il est pede comme toi et ton pere

écouter ma soeur

Mon père est mort

Say astakhfurulah its ramadan.

[Meyle]

X.Playa is an intellectual unlike the rest of the Isaaq crew. No functioning brain whatsoever (excluding Rightwing.)

[LetsCookBreakfast]

I'm going to agree with NHG on this. She hit the nail on the head.

[LiquidHYDROGEN]

There are plenty of Isaq historians that are correcting "past historical mistakes" (if those past mistakes you are talking about are the ones made by the kacaan in regards to qabiil).

I will give credit where its due without prejudice and xplayer deserves his fair share of credits but i have to say his past doesn't do him any favours. This is a man who was know for his hate towards daarood (not that he is alone in that regards) but as far as history of Isaq and daarood is concerned some might say he lacks intellectual integrity.

As far as the history of the dervish is concerned, i think its a tragedy when the only sources we use and bicker over is the ones found in the books written by cadaans. I know they have kept records of the going on in that time and what they have witnessed and heard, but who's to say if those records are bias? Isn't the records and sources we are using written by another finite that can be guilty of prejudice? Whos to say if the source of a particular historian at time was based purely on interest, or he favoured one clan over another?

This questions are what i asked myself after reading xplayers research on the Dervish. I mean since its history and we are to believe that its fact then we should read things with an open heart and mind, and when the man behind the book am reading has a checkered past then i have to read carefully and always be mindful of the possibility that everything is not what they seem.

My two sumuni.

That is incredibly embarrassing, yes.

[X.Playa]

what so embaressing about contemparary sources or "primary sources" in fact the English were more honest and decent then most of the Kacaan and the Daaroods who defecated into that part of somali history and made it as a hate material to attack other non-daarood clans and indoctirnate their childern to the point of pathalogy , look no further then BabyGirl, OD, Ismail, Cilmiile, and the rest of the insects that repersent the dhulbahnate clan.

[X.Playa]

There are plenty of Isaq historians that are correcting "past historical mistakes" (if those past mistakes you are talking about are the ones made by the kacaan in regards to qabiil).

I will give credit where its due without prejudice and xplayer deserves his fair share of credits but i have to say his past doesn't do him any favours. This is a man who was know for his hate towards daarood (not that he is alone in that regards) but as far as history of Isaq and daarood is concerned some might say he lacks intellectual integrity.

As far as the history of the dervish is concerned, i think its a tragedy when the only sources we use and bicker over is the ones found in the books written by cadaans. I know they have kept records of the going on in that time and what they have witnessed and heard, but who's to say if those records are bias? Isn't the records and sources we are using written by another finite that can be guilty of prejudice? Whos to say if the source of a particular historian at time was based purely on interest, or he favoured one clan over another?

This questions are what i asked myself after reading xplayers research on the Dervish. I mean since its history and we are to believe that its fact then we should read things with an open heart and mind, and when the man behind the book am reading has a checkered past then i have to read carefully and always be mindful of the possibility that everything is not what they seem.

My two sumuni.

and why should one like the Daaroods before writing a book? is it some sort of a divine preconditions.? tell me one single Daarood historians who ever said something decent about any Isaaq , and then you can have your "open" soul and mind by yourself in your little eutopian island.

[NewHargeisaGirl]

je veux vraiment savoir la verite habo

ok.

il est pede comme toi et ton pere

écouter ma soeur

Mon père est mort

Say astakhfurulah its ramadan.

Je m'en fous s'il est mort

[PrinceDaadi]

History is written by who ever wins so i read for entertainment.

[X.Playa]

History is written by who ever wins so i read for entertainment.

Not in this case, the daily diaries and correspondence and intelligence reports are pure data written to make reasonable decesions so those can't be manipulated , what you are refering to are books and even those most British books regarding Somali tribes can be called objective for the British/Italians had no clan prejudice unlike the Somalis the likes of Xilidhbaan , Idaajaa, Aw Jaamac, Said s Samtar, Cabdisalaan Ciise Salawo and Abdi Sheekh Abdi , what these guys write are nothing but a clannist diatribes againest clans they hate. So most somalis are better off reading colonial records of somali history then the above mentioned folks.

[Kukri]

There are plenty of Isaq historians that are correcting "past historical mistakes" (if those past mistakes you are talking about are the ones made by the kacaan in regards to qabiil).

I will give credit where its due without prejudice and xplayer deserves his fair share of credits but i have to say his past doesn't do him any favours. This is a man who was know for his hate towards daarood (not that he is alone in that regards) but as far as history of Isaq and daarood is concerned some might say he lacks intellectual integrity.

As far as the history of the dervish is concerned, i think its a tragedy when the only sources we use and bicker over is the ones found in the books written by cadaans. I know they have kept records of the going on in that time and what they have witnessed and heard, but who's to say if those records are bias? Isn't the records and sources we are using written by another finite that can be guilty of prejudice? Whos to say if the source of a particular historian at time was based purely on interest, or he favoured one clan over another?

This questions are what i asked myself after reading xplayers research on the Dervish. I mean since its history and we are to believe that its fact then we should read things with an open heart and mind, and when the man behind the book am reading has a checkered past then i have to read carefully and always be mindful of the possibility that everything is not what they seem.

My two sumuni.

That is incredibly embarrassing, yes.

It is indeed. Very.

[Kukri]

There are plenty of Isaq historians that are correcting "past historical mistakes" (if those past mistakes you are talking about are the ones made by the kacaan in regards to qabiil).

I will give credit where its due without prejudice and xplayer deserves his fair share of credits but i have to say his past doesn't do him any favours. This is a man who was know for his hate towards daarood (not that he is alone in that regards) but as far as history of Isaq and daarood is concerned some might say he lacks intellectual integrity.

As far as the history of the dervish is concerned, i think its a tragedy when the only sources we use and bicker over is the ones found in the books written by cadaans. I know they have kept records of the going on in that time and what they have witnessed and heard, but who's to say if those records are bias? Isn't the records and sources we are using written by another finite that can be guilty of prejudice? Whos to say if the source of a particular historian at time was based purely on interest, or he favoured one clan over another?

This questions are what i asked myself after reading xplayers research on the Dervish. I mean since its history and we are to believe that its fact then we should read things with an open heart and mind, and when the man behind the book am reading has a checkered past then i have to read carefully and always be mindful of the possibility that everything is not what they seem.

My two sumuni.

and why should one like the Daaroods before writing a book? is it some sort of a divine preconditions.? tell me one single Daarood historians who ever said something decent about any Isaaq , and then you can have your "open" soul and mind by yourself in your little eutopian island.

Am not gonna make a case for darood historian nor am i defending those that distorted history.
This is about you and your research in regards to the Dervish history.

And all i mentioned is the history you have in this place with past fights with daroods.
And as a writer how will your history in this place and feelings towards that clan effect your research.

Is your work free from dishonesty, shortcuts, plagiarism and the use of faulty logic?