There is a point in the Creed of Imaam Tahawi not to rebel againstLOL. If you think for a second I was trying to defend a criminal military dictatorship you are clueless
I was attacking religion to show how ridiculous religion is. Religion sees people fighting oppression as sinners
I am,
Abdi "I am not in the business of defending despots" Johnson
tyranny/opression for it is preferable to Anarchy.
This point was included so that we could be wary/suspicious of the khawaarij/revolutionary
types who promise us Utopia in this world in return for overthrowing order.
Tawawi's point is also thought to apply to a muslim dowlad and a muslim ruler.
I would argue the former communist regime, which not only
had a disdain for the Religion but actively executed those
that defended it was NOT Muslim.
The violence it unleashed also cannot be called "normal" everyday tyranny
we we can endure, It was Anarchic pure and simple.
We got rid of Anarchy and replaced it with order.
We also got rid of communism and replaced it with Islam
Therefore I see no contradiction in agreeing with Tahawi's Book on Creed
and Getting rid of that Xaaraan ideology known as Communism.