Page 1 of 1

The deviancy of Al Maghrib Institute and ahlu bidca.

Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 1:21 pm
by grandpakhalif

Re: The deviancy of Al Maghrib Institute and ahlu bidca.

Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 2:46 pm
by samadoon-waaxid
It bothers me when I see a guy like this blowing hot air and thinking he is refuting anything.He couldnt even elaborate on the very premise of his argument which that Yasir al-qadi is mubtadic.Whats all of this hostility is about? cuz he sat with suufis? so what? he cant bring an ayah or hadith that says u r mubtadic if you sit with a suufi even if his life depends on it.This brother should do something better than hating on the brothers in al-maqhrib :down:

Re: The deviancy of Al Maghrib Institute and ahlu bidca.

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 11:26 am
by grandpakhalif
Al maghrib is ahlu bidca, I would run from them :up: Sh. Mohamad bin Hadee al Madkhali an caalim warned against yasir qadhi and his institution.

Re: The deviancy of Al Maghrib Institute and ahlu bidca.

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:03 pm
by UlteriorMotive
It bothers me when I see a guy like this blowing hot air and thinking he is refuting anything.He couldnt even elaborate on the very premise of his argument which that Yasir al-qadi is mubtadic.Whats all of this hostility is about? cuz he sat with suufis? so what? he cant bring an ayah or hadith that says u r mubtadic if you sit with a suufi even if his life depends on it.This brother should do something better than hating on the brothers in al-maqhrib :down:
It bothers me when I see a guy like this blowing hot air and thinking he is refuting anything.He couldnt even elaborate on the very premise of his argument which that Yasir al-qadi is mubtadic.Whats all of this hostility is about? cuz he sat with suufis? so what? he cant bring an ayah or hadith that says u r mubtadic if you sit with a suufi even if his life depends on it.This brother should do something better than hating on the brothers in al-maqhrib :down:
That's the problem with salafis. On the one hand, I applaud their efforts in combating innovation which is dangerous and I love the pureness of the deen they strive to practice. However, this constant 'refutation' business is ridiculous.

Also, we should not blind follow people...which is a reasonable premise....but at the same time
Horta what is your manhaj? Who are your sheikhs?
??

Either you disagree with people on points of islamic principle, in which case you forth your evidence....or you respect their opinions. What does 'their sheikh' have to do with anything?

Don't follow knowledgeable scholars such as the four imams..but it's perfectly acceptable to do the same for abu khadeejah?