The Madkhali syndrome
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 12:15 am
The Madkhali syndrome is quite common among delusioned followers calling itself "Saalifiyyah".
I will not delve into where they have erred, but I will offer common signs often over zelous followers show in their attempt to be from the "saved sect" in an attempt to follow their leaders advice.
1. They claim to be against partisanship and secthood, yet more than 85% of their "dawah" are dedicated to refutations and counter-refutations of other Islamic groups/sects, and deciding who is "saved" or not. Their time and lectures is mostly spent with name calling, betty arguments, rivarlies, almost matching the celebrity gossips common in the west.
2. They decieve their followers by telling them only they know the scholars with the "correct Aqeedah" and so every time they come across a new person, they search their history to find one or two mistakes or to see what "Aqeedah" they follow. from that point on, that person if he is not to their liking is branded, a "mubtadi" or an innovator even if what he is saying is sound and is in agreement with the sunnah.
3. They commonly cite Hajaj ibn Yusuf to come to the far reaching conclusion of why the Saudi government is an Islamic one and why all who are true salafi
must praise the ruler of the Saudi throne
4. They argue that a Jihad without an Imam is forbidden in the religion, even in situations of self defense
5. They insult a great many of the scholars of the past for minor disagreements over aqeedah, overlooking their positive contribution to the Islamic knowledge
6. Many of their followers are recent converts who are looking for an "authentic Islam" and talk of authenticity is connected with Salafism itself, and pious followers, drawing in naive crows who are innocent of movement itself.
Fyi- Madkhali refers to one of their esteemed scholars, Sh. Rabiic madkhali.
For more information of how a group built on name calling, sowing of division, and partisanship fell apart (now they are only an Image of their former selves) see "The Rise and Fall of the Salafi movement"- http://www.umarlee.com/rise-fall.html
I would advice anyone who is sincere in their attempt to learn about the Salafi movement to give time to look into brother Umar lee's blog.
I will not delve into where they have erred, but I will offer common signs often over zelous followers show in their attempt to be from the "saved sect" in an attempt to follow their leaders advice.
1. They claim to be against partisanship and secthood, yet more than 85% of their "dawah" are dedicated to refutations and counter-refutations of other Islamic groups/sects, and deciding who is "saved" or not. Their time and lectures is mostly spent with name calling, betty arguments, rivarlies, almost matching the celebrity gossips common in the west.
2. They decieve their followers by telling them only they know the scholars with the "correct Aqeedah" and so every time they come across a new person, they search their history to find one or two mistakes or to see what "Aqeedah" they follow. from that point on, that person if he is not to their liking is branded, a "mubtadi" or an innovator even if what he is saying is sound and is in agreement with the sunnah.
3. They commonly cite Hajaj ibn Yusuf to come to the far reaching conclusion of why the Saudi government is an Islamic one and why all who are true salafi
must praise the ruler of the Saudi throne
4. They argue that a Jihad without an Imam is forbidden in the religion, even in situations of self defense
5. They insult a great many of the scholars of the past for minor disagreements over aqeedah, overlooking their positive contribution to the Islamic knowledge
6. Many of their followers are recent converts who are looking for an "authentic Islam" and talk of authenticity is connected with Salafism itself, and pious followers, drawing in naive crows who are innocent of movement itself.
Fyi- Madkhali refers to one of their esteemed scholars, Sh. Rabiic madkhali.
For more information of how a group built on name calling, sowing of division, and partisanship fell apart (now they are only an Image of their former selves) see "The Rise and Fall of the Salafi movement"- http://www.umarlee.com/rise-fall.html
I would advice anyone who is sincere in their attempt to learn about the Salafi movement to give time to look into brother Umar lee's blog.