SomaliNet Forums

This Shiekh said it straight at it is, a descendant of our Prophet s.a.w., a scholar of the mainstream Ahlel-Sunnah wal-Jama'ah from the blessed land of Hadhramaut.
Allahu Akbar this is the true Islam the Prophet was preaching.

This is a falsehood, and it's shirk.

Sheikh Fawzaan(xafidahullah)

The mans audio recordings and books will judge for itself. The man is an innovator. A babbler. He calls to worship the graves and souls. He is a babbler. His audio recordings are available. In his own words, he mocks Ahl AlSunnah and Ahl Al-Tawheed (Family Of Monotheism). He mocks them.

^ Prophet Muhammad himself said "Wallahi i don't fear you commit shirk upon me" THE PROPHET SAID IT HIMSELF! we only follow the words of the prophet and Allah and the pious saxaba and muslims of the past.



Mashallah

benefit of doing dhikr in assembly.
Ibn `Umar reported, "The Prophet, pbuh, said, `When you pass by a garden of paradise, avail yourselves of it.' The Companions asked, `What are the gardens of Paradise, O Messenger of Allah?" The Prophet, peace be upon him, replied, `The assemblies of dhikr. There are some angels of Allah who go about looking for such assemblies of dhikr, and when they find them they surround them.'"
[Quoted from Fiqh us-Sunnah compiled by As-Sayyid Sabiq, vol. 4, ch. 6.]

Qasid al Burda is now shirk too?, and you (Salafis) call the Ahul-bayt , Ahlul Bidah?, Inalilah wa ina ilayna raajicuun.

And you take Abu Khadeejah the well known Liar amongst Muslims as one of your greatest inspires? shame on you

Abu Khadeejah LIES to Shaykh Wase-ullah Abbass

This is a transcript of the meeting between Shaykh Wase-ullah and Salafi Publications in the summer of 2004:

This part of the dialogue has been translated word for word from the recorded meeting which lasted for over six hours in 2004 in Birmingham:

Shaykh Waseullah: That which is known about him is that he (Abu Khadeejah) sits with women for Fataawa. Is this correct?

Abu KhadeejahSP: This is not correct. This is a lie Yaa Shaykh.

Shaykh Waseullah: Allahu Akbar. Allahu Akbar!

Abu KhadeejahSP: This is a lie Yaa Shaykh. A big lie. That I give Fatwa Yaa Shaykh in rulings concerning women and marriage? NO NEVER! This is because Yaa Shaykh we always contact the scholars when there are differences.

Shaykh Waseullah: Does anyone ask you questions or not? Does Abu Khadeejah give Fatwa in people’s affairs? You say you do not give fatwa. Never?

Abu KhadeejahSP: No, Never!

Shaykh Waseullah:Not in the affairs of men or in the affairs of women?

Abu KhadeejahSP:No. Giving Fatwa. No. But Yaa Shaykh we quote Fataawa from the likes of Shaykh Ibn Baaz regarding the Rawaafi’d and dealing with the Rawaafi’d.

Shaykh Waseullah: But Fataawa? Do you give it?

Abu KhadeejahSP: Never Yaa Shaykh. This is Wallaahi Yaa Shaykh, Billaahi wa Aqsom Billaahi and I am ready to do Mubaahala with anyone. I do not give Fataawa in the affairs of marriage, divorce, khula and in anything. And we Yaa Shaykh ASLAN did NOT enter into the affair of this Abdur-Rahmaan and his wife. This is what is present Yaa Shaykh.

http://a.imageshack.us/img202/169/lyingaboutkhulla1.jpg

Important Notes:

1. The above Khula Certificate was issued on 12 September 2002 and was witnessed by Dawood Burbank and SIGNED by Abu KhadeejahSP. They obtained the permission of the brother Abdur-Rahmaan after they lied to him and claimed Shaykh Abu Anas had given the Khula.

2. The brother Abdur-Rahmaan exposed their lies and this is the real reason why they stopped dealing with divorce and khula applications and not the cover ups and lies Abu khadeejahSP wrote on the subject a few years ago.

3. Abu KhadeejahSP blatantly LYING to Shaykh Waseullah. Claiming he did not ASLAN enter into the affair of Abdur-Rahmaan and his wife.

4. He then swears by Allah (3 times) and denies giving Fatwa. He is prepared to Swear By Allah upon LIES.

5. He signs the Certificate: Abu Abdillah Abdul Wahid Ar-Ray’. This was the period when he used to refer to himself as Ar-Ray’ believing that he was a descendant of the salaf from Khurasaan. He later dropped this when he was exposed for being from Ar-Rain and not Ar-Ray’. Ar-Rain is a cast in Mirpur, Pakistan that grows vegetables on farm land.

6. The witness of brother Abdur-Rahmaan which he wrote in November 2007 will also help:

THE WITNESS OF BROTHER SHEIKH ABDUR-RAHMAAN:

Assalamau alykum Wa rahmatullah . As regards to the issue of khulla and the way abu khadeejah dealt with it.

I see and know it to be wrong and a lie by abu khadeejah. Reason being is that abu khadeejah said to me clearly in his own words that:

"Shaykh Abu Anas(from Kuwait)gave the khulla and ordered the khulla"

I had accepted the fact that Shaykh Abu Anas gave the fatwa, based upon what abu khadeejah told me that Shaykh Abu Anas said to give the khulla. So his words were "so are you ganna give the khulla or not" Being under pressure and stressed and manipulated, I gave my wife the khulla.

After some time, news got out to some brothers that I was no longer with my wife and children. There were many brothers that knew, specifically there were brothers from Alum Rock, who advised me to call Shaykh Abu Anas and ask him the truth of the matter because he abu khadeejah lies. Due to this I called Shaykh Abu Anas and asked him with regards to my family situation and the khulla. I asked him if he gave any kind of suggestion, order, hint, anything implying to give the khulla?

Shaykh Abu Anas TOTALLY denied it, I asked the Shaykh " Have you seen the khulla form that my wife filled in, has it been sent to you? he replied "NO." abu khadeejah prior to this told me that it was translated and sent to the shaykh. The above phone call to the shaykh was made on loud speaker in front of Abdul Haseeb,Waqar Ul-Haq, and Mushtaq Ahmed in his house (Mushtaq's).

Prior to this phone call, brother Usamah Fearon (from Birmingham), specifically approached abu khadeejah and asked him with regards to my kullah. And Usamah said he remembers abu khadeejah telling him to leave it,(the issue) and that Shaykh Abu Anas gave the Khullah. Then when Usamah asked him another time he said; "one of the shaykhs in kuwait gave the khulla".

After the the phone conversation with Shaykh Abu Anas I angrily approached abu khadeejah about what Shaykh Abu Anas said, and he said "I have very little to do with this" (the khullah situation) and one of the shaykhs in kuwait dealt with it.To this day, no one knows who this shaykh is or what fatwa he gave. Then after his lies came out in the open, abu khadeejah declared me to be a FAASIQ, by using the private information on the Khullah forms and spreading it to his friends and in the community. Saying I don’t get up to pray Fajr prayer. This was spread and people stopped giving me salaams and made Hajr of me.

He basically spread around the community, the reasons my ex-wife wanted a Khulla. Sadly my ex-wife still has deep Ghulu in abu kahdeejah and in the maktaba, so much so, that one of the reasons she put down for wanting a khulla was that he doesnt attend the duroos at the maktaba.

After 4 and half years, she now decides to bring this issue open into the public. The details of our divorce are private and not there to be viewed & used for the world to see. Shaykh Waseullah brought out nothing in public. He only mentioned it as a example of the fasaad sp causes in England.

As regards to whatever happened between us, it doesnt mean that I didnt make any mistakes or didnt have any shortcomings, but the whole process from the Khulla application was a complete exageration with lies on her part and was done with deception. It is her word against mine and members of the public should not get involved.

But the main point is that abu khadeejah lied to me, deceived me, brought out my private affairs into the public and he dissolved my marriage with lies and deception. May Allah guide him and grant him truthfulness.

About my kids, at this moment in time i do speak to them and i have explained the situation to them that i do not have sufficient money at the moment to send to them,but InshaAllah i do understand my responsibilities and i have and i am,and i am trying to do all that is in my capabilities. Allahu-Musta`aan.

As regards to my ex-wife and what is happening now, then this is abu khadeejah's way to side track the people by using my ex-wife & allowing her to get involved, as a means of gossip and entertainment for the world.

The main point to make is that the people should know the fasaad, lies and deceptive ways of Abu Khadeejah specifically. May Allah save us from his evil ways and guide him.

Then when i was in medina 4 years ago,approximatley 1 and half years after my ex-wife took my children to kuwait without my knowledge, i recieved a phone call (Shamsur-rahmaan,a student in medina is a witness to this) from Ahmed Sharaa in Kuwait asking me what I want to do with my wife? Do I want her back or let her go? Because he was aware of my situation and put it forward to Shaykh Saalim -at-Taweel, who said that the khullah was not valid. I said to Ahmed Sharaa I want her back, two weeks later i received a phone call from Ahmed who said "She doesn't want to be with you". So it was then that I gave her the khulla.

And I finally quote:

"Whoever keeps himself busy seeking Allah instead of himself,
Allah will save him from himself, and whoever keeps himself busy with Allah more than the people, Allah will save him from the people.
Whoever keeps himself busy with himself rather than Allah,
Allah will leave him to himself, and whoever busies himself with people rather than Allah, Allah will leave him to the people." (Al-fawaaid)

This Liar should not be taken seriously, Grandpakhalif i have defeated you once again

Fool Sheikh Falaah another great sheikh defends Abu Khadeejah from Sheikh Wasiullah refutation

he Shaykh mentions a question presented to Shaykh Wasiullah, and then corroborated the existence and presence of the exact text of the question, and whether the questioner is known and whether the entire answer of the Shaykh has been heard.

The Shaykh then said that the manhaj of the Sahaabah is what is to be the judge, and he quoted the verse about verifying the information of a faasiq, and then he said that one must verify the question and verify the answer.

He said that those who ask questions are of two types, one who asks in order that he may learn and one who asks in order to get a specific answer from a Shaykh which agrees what is already with him. There is a great difference between these two types of questioners.

The Shaykh then went on to mention a story of how someone raised the issue of Shaykh al-Ghunayman who had answered a particular question (mentioned in a certain way) by saying that the Ash'aris are "Ahl as-Sunnah in this subject" and which was used by them to say that he affirms the Ash'aris are from Ahl as-Sunnah. This person said to Shaykh Falah how come your Shaykh says one thing and you have written a book called "The Ash'aris are not from Ahl as-Sunnah?" So Shaykh Falah went home and phoned Shaykh al-Ghunayman and asked him I've heard you say that the Ash'aris are from Ahl al-Sunnah. After thinking for a short while Shaykh al-Ghunayman said, yes, I said that when a ruler is an Ash'ari and he announces jihad is it upon the Muslims to follow him, and he said, yes, he is to be followed, because in this arena they are considered to be Ahl al-Sunnah. Shaykh Falah said that this answer itself is taken from Ibn Taymiyyah who said the term Ahl al-Sunnah is used in two ways, general and specific. In the general sense all those who are not Raafidah are said to be Ahl al-Sunnah, but in a specific sense, it is only those who affirm the attributes etc. who are said to be Ahl al-Sunnah, (and therefore, the Ash'aris are not Ahl al-Sunnah).

The Shaykh makes the point that this is what they do, they craft a question in a very specific way to get a specific answer.

The Shaykh then addressed Shaykh Wasiullah's kalam by mentioning the saying of Imam Malik, everyones saying can be taken or rejected. The Shaykh mentioned that tathabbut has already been made (verifying the question and answer and ascribing it to Shaykh Wasiullah).

Then the Shaykh went on to explain that his speech of Wasiullah against Abu Khadeejah (and Abu Hakeem) is different to what is known by other Scholars such as himself who have known them for 10-15 years. And the speech of Shaykh Wasiullah is just mujmal (general). The Shaykh said the way of the Sahaabah and the Salaf is that only a jarh mufassar is accepted with respect to one who is known. The Shaykh asked the question whether Shaykh Wasiullah gave any detail (tafseel) in his jarh and the answer is no, meanwhile the Shaykh mentioned that Abu Khadeejah is well-known to the Scholars and has translated books and lectures, and has tapes, and that he does not know him to have translated books or tapes of bid'ah. Yet Shaykh Wasiullah said that if you were to attend this conference with Abu Khadeejah (and Abu Hakeem present and speaking) it will lead to harm upon you and upon the Salafis. Shaykh Falaah said that he knows Abu Khadeejah for 14 years and does not know of statements he made oppposing Salafiyyah.

Then the Shaykh went on to mention that Abu Khadeejah speaks about the Jam'iyyah Ahl al-Hadeeth on the issue of elections and inviting women speakers not properly dressed into their venues, and if asked are these people the ones who represent and implement Salafiyyah we say no.

But what we look at what is done at Maktabah Salafiyyah and all the lessons and what they teach and who they invite and who teaches at their mosque from the Scholars like Shaykh Abdullah al-Ghudayan, Shaykh Ubayd, Shaykh Rabee and others... and the Shaykh mentioned that once he visited Shaykh Abdullah al-Ghudayan who asked him whether he visited Birmingham and whether he knows Abu Khadeejah... so this is the type of thing that indicates Salafiyyah.

So the Shaykh said that no jarh is accepted when it is general and if it came from the Shaykh or we say to the questioner, why did you not give any detail in the question. So it is clear that the questioner is a person of objectives and if he was sincere he would not have omitted who specifically is participating in the conference, he only mentioned Abu Khadeejah and Abu Hakeem by name. So this type of thing is not desirable, the affairs should be clear, open apparent.

If it is known that Abu Khadeejah had bid'ah or war against the Salafis, the Shaykh says he would never participate with him or visit him at Maktabah Salafiyyah. So the way of the Salaf is verification, and detail, and general speech is not accepted. But there are objectives and goals and the one who asked the question ... (then there is some speech about who translated and who asked the question, that they are not the same person, that Shadeed Muhammad translated the question and answer but the questioner is someone else). The Shaykh said that the issue of tafseel, being specific and giving detail is of utmost importance.

The Shaykh mentioned again the saying of Imaam Malik that everyone can have his saying accepted or rejected, and then he said says that whilst he will not say anything in particular about Shaykh Wasiullah, as a general remark, there is no doubt that sentiments have a role to play and that he recalls that Shaykh Wasiullah always says that he has an attachment with Ahl al-Hadeeth, that he is from them, from their sons, or from their school, in India, then these no doubt have a role and an effect and we say may Allaah pardon him, and that if we were with him, by Allaah, we would request him to answer, what is this harm that has reached the Salafis and Salafiyyah from Abu Khadeejah, give me just a single example. Yes, if he said, here is one, two, three examples, fine, but with this general speech, it is not permissible to accept his speech at all, in any situation.

And the issue of he harms Salafiyyah, or has enmity to Salafiyyah and so on, then what he has written and said and so on should be brought and looked at but as for these types of tumult and commotion being raised, they will never end and if it is the case that Imaam Malik said what he said in his time, it is even more worthy of being said now.

I advise all the people to advise the conference, and if there is anything, we can debate, discuss, we don't have anything, all of us can speak. He then mentioned the statement of al-Awzaaee, "Stop where the people stopped (i.e. the Companions) and speak with what they spoke and hold back from what they held back from," and in a narration, "remain silent from what they remained silent about" so this is what you should implement and if you do not, then you will depart from the Jamaa'ah.

The Shaykh said that we certainly accept clarification of error, but myself and likewise Abu Khadeejah. He mentioned the saying of Umar, "may Allaah have mercy to a man who guided me to my errors," and he said this is what the Companions are upon and this is what we likewise are upon, so if you bring the issues in which Abu Khadeejah has erred, then I myself personally will debate with him.

The Shaykh was then asked about those spread and distribute this speech of Shaykh Wasiullah. He said that such a person has opposed the manhaj of the Companions, it is opposed to the way of the Companions because he gave precedence to the general disparagement. The Shaykh then speaks to Abu Khadeejah who is the gathering, and asks how many books he has translated and how many cassettes he has. The Shaykh said that if we were speaking about a person who does not have any books or any tapes and is hardly known, maybe we can accept the jarh mujmal (general disparagement), but when a person is present, known for 14 years, has written, has books, tapes and then we just accept a general disparagement, this is but a manifestation of madness.

But why do they spread it? Because there is a goal, objective. So we say fear Allaah, if you are Salafis, then books and tapes of Abu Khadeejah are present, read them and find errors in them, but in this manner, with a jarh mujmal then this is not acceptable, if you claim to be Salafis, then Salafiyyah is clear and apparent.

The Shaykh then mentions about Shaykh al-Albani about a man who wrote a book and he was a student of Abdur Rahman Abdul-Khaliq, but it may well have been Abdur Rahman Abdul-Khaliq himself, and he spoke of the Jaamiyyah and Madkhaliyyah and the Mandakariyyah, that these are the "claimaints of Salafiyyah." This person said about them, "Khawarij with the callers, Murji'ah with the rulers, Rafidah with the .... etc" So this was taken to Shaykh al-Albani and read it to him directly, the Shaykh said, "He has destroyed his own house... how can they be Murji'ah and Khawarij at the same time and Raafidah, who can they combine between all this." Then Shaykh al-Albani said "This person who wrote this is one of two types, either an ignoramus, so we ask Allaah to guide him and that he learns, or he is a person of desires, so I ask Allaah to break his back."

So we say to the one who spread this (speech of Shaykh Wasiullah) that Abu Khadeejah is present, his books and cassettes are present, and he will be at the conference, so come and give us examples of where he wars against the Salafis and Salafiyyah. As for spreading it, then we ask Allaah to guide you or as our Shaykh (al-Albaanee) said, that He breaks your back and relieves the Salafis and Salafiyyah of you.

Grandpa is always one step ahead of you kid, may Allah take your good deeds and give them to Abu Khadeejah who you slandered and called him a liar.

^ Prophet Muhammad himself said "Wallahi i don't fear you commit shirk upon me" THE PROPHET SAID IT HIMSELF! we only follow the words of the prophet and Allah and the pious saxaba and muslims of the past.

Mashallah

benefit of doing dhikr in assembly.
Ibn `Umar reported, "The Prophet, pbuh, said, `When you pass by a garden of paradise, avail yourselves of it.' The Companions asked, `What are the gardens of Paradise, O Messenger of Allah?" The Prophet, peace be upon him, replied, `The assemblies of dhikr. There are some angels of Allah who go about looking for such assemblies of dhikr, and when they find them they surround them.'"
[Quoted from Fiqh us-Sunnah compiled by As-Sayyid Sabiq, vol. 4, ch. 6.]

when ibn hajar explained that first hadith you mentioned, he said it was meant the ummah will not gather upon shirk, not that each person wouldnt. imam nawawi agrees with him on this also. find me a single hadith that allows hadra, or any aqwaal from the jamhoor al ulamaa that allows this.

He lied as he sweard to Allah thrice for something he knew what he did shut up you Wahhabi dog scholars such as Sheikh Al Habib Sayid Ali Zaynal-Cabidin Al Jufri are true islamic scholars who reflect on the sunna and follow it 100% he is a descendent of the prophet salalahu calayhi wasalam and the prophet declared how important how the Ahlul Bayt is إني أوشك أن أدعى فأجيب، وإني تارك فيكم الثقلين: كتاب الله عز وجل وعترتي،
— كتاب الله حبل ممدود من السماء الى الارض، وعترتي أهل بيتي—
وإن اللطيف الخبير أخبرني أنهما لن يفترقا حتى يردا علي الحوض،
فانظروا كيف تخلفوني فيهما
The Prophet address his followers: O' People! I am about to be called upon [by the Most High] and so I will soon be leaving you. I will bequeath you two most precious matters. They are:
The book of Allah, as a cord extended from heaven to earth, and
My Itra [family], Ahlul Bayt.
Allah, the Benevolent and the All-Knowing has informed me that these two will be inseparable (from each other) till they reach me at the Pool of Blessings in Heaven. See then, O' people, how well you are to deal with them after I depart [from this world]

While quoted in various formats, and due to its importance, this famous Hadith was declared on at least 5 occasions:
Farewell Haj during the Prophet's Farewell Speech,
Ghadeer Khum,
After leaving Ta'if,
At his minbar (pulpit) in Medina, and
Even just before he died, in his room full of Companions.[2]
The Hadith is reported by more than 20 Sahaaba. The Hadith was a lot like a unique will by the Prophet (pbuh). It was a unique legacy to leave after he was gone from this world; since after the Prophet (pbuh) was to depart from this world he was leaving behind two most precious matters. He specified the Holy Quran as the most valuable asset to mankind, and he specified Ahlul Bayt,( his family) as the second most important asset he was to leave.Why is the Ahlul-Bayt are so imporatant that the prophet has to mention his bloodline/lineage and the Holy Qur'an in the very same sentence The answer is that Ahlul Bayt would be the best source to explain the Quran's meaning, and correctly interpreting its numerous aspects. The Holy Quran includes the firm (Muh'kam محــــكـم ) and the non-specific phrases (Mutashabah مـتـــشا بـه ), and the abrogators (Al-Naasikh النـاســخ ) and the Abrogated (Al-Man'sookh الـمـنـــســوخ ), the brief الـمـجــمـل and the detailed الـمـســـهــب , in addition to numerous Ah’kaam احــكام , among other things. To explain these points correctly, immeasurable knowledge and exquisite thought become necessary, requirements beyond the grasp of most people. The Prophet (pbuh) knew Ahlul Bayt to be the fitting fountain of that position; since the Prophet (pbuh) taught the essence and the substance of the Quran to Ali.

Al Jufri is a Sunni going all the way back to the Prophet S.A.W.S you ignorant imbecile May Allah curse your tongue and bisect it into two like snake that you choke over your own venom, did the british & house of Saud treat your mother special, that you come here & try to blemish a great man of his stature, but you can never do so, because there will always be people like me ready to slaughter cowards like you, and eradicate your ideology from the World ya jahil.

Wahhabi dog scholars

This sums up your whole argument, no logic whatsoever.


Who cares if he's ahlu bayt if hes an innovator, suufi? Abu Lahab is ahlu bayt, why dont you praise that kaafir too?

What dumb logic.

Abuukar is rageedi

I remember a time when grandpa himself posted this video

Wahhabi dog scholars

This sums up your whole argument, no logic whatsoever.


Who cares if he's ahlu bayt if hes an innovator, suufi? Abu Lahab is ahlu bayt, why dont you praise that kaafir too?

What dumb logic.

Go back and read what i said, The prophet said five times in his blessed life time in this dunya that he would leave us in the world with two things, The Quran And his Citra (Ahul Bayt) whom you munaafiqins call Ahul Bidac, Abu khadeejah kept on saying "Prophet Muhammad's Dead!" several times in his 10 brief lecture is this how a scholar should speak of the greatest man ever to set foot on earth?, when the prophet himself said "In the grave the prophets are alive!" and that he saw Nabi Musa (a.s) praying whilst in his grave and told the companions if i only took you with me to see it with your own eyes!?, Unlike you idiots of islam who corrupt the deen with the help of Britain and the Kuffar Lackeys aka The House of Sa'ud i respect and love the prophet sincerly with all my life before him I Worship and Love Allah, you Munaafiqins only use the deen to oppress Muslims worldwide, how glad i would be if allah grants me to be alive at the time when the descendent of the prophet , the propheised mahdi puts the Saudi Kingdom to the sword!, Praise be to Allah ! and Praise be to his beloved messenger Muhammad Sallalahu calayhi wasalam, ya munafiq al kelab, walk away like a man and quit defending these men who embarrass islam

So your calling Abubakar Bin Siddiq (ra) a munaafiq? He said the same thing:

Abu Bakr arrived and said, "Sit down, O 'Umar!" But 'Umar refused to sit down. So the people came to Abu Bakr and left Umar. Abu Bakr said, "To proceed, if anyone amongst you used to worship Muhammad, then Muhammad has passed away, but if (anyone of) you used to worship Allah, then Allah is Alive and shall never die. Allah said, "And Muhammad is but a messenger; the messengers have come before him; if then he dies or is killed will you turn back upon your heels? And whoever turns back upon his heels, he will by no means do harm to Allah in the least and Allah will reward the grateful." (3.144)
'Umar said, "By Allah, when I heard Abu Bakr reciting it, my legs could not support me and I fell down at the very moment of hearing him reciting it, declaring that the Prophet had passed away."[40]

Fool.

listen believe this HADRA. listen carefully if you can basic arabic. and tell me the meaning of what this ahlusunnah men are CHANTING OF(HADRA)


According wahaabis this digri( laa illaaha illaa huwaa) is a shirk and same wahaabis is not shirk calling porn watching death dude

LA BEEYKA YAA USAAMA

la beeyka muslims use for only allah and not death arab guy

abuukarsubeer, akhi suaashaydu kajawaab waan ku sugayey