Page 2 of 2

Re: Is Somalia under occupation??

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:42 pm
by adanboy
[quote="*Arabman"]Even non-Somalis (including Americans and Europeans) know Somalia is under Xabashi occupation. Technically, Somaliland is indirectly occupied; if it wants direct occupation, let it severe its relationship with the Xabashi and declare Shariica its system of governance.[/quote]

thats right:.and while the avarage norhener is chasing the somaliland dream and wants freedom from Somalia,they are realitty in ethiopian prison..the rest of somalia talks for itself..

Re: Is Somalia under occupation??

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 9:47 pm
by QansaGabeyle
Yeah Somalia is occupied......it has been since 1991.

Re: Is Somalia under occupation??

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 10:02 pm
by muktaar

Re: Is Somalia under occupation??

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 10:18 pm
by MJ-Pride
Not it ain't occupied. People in PUNTLAND go on with their life without Tigrey gun and Same with Somaliland. Its just Banaadir and Hiraan that are under the occupation and that due to their being savages and uncivilized nation.

Re: Is Somalia under occupation??

Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 5:10 am
by Somaliweyn
Laughing

So Puntland and Somaliland only have Tigre military advisers and instructors Laughing

The North region of Somalia is the most reactionairy region in Somalia. While one half (Northwest) wants the dismemberment of Somalia for pure selfish clan-reasons the other half (Norteast) wants to hand over the sovereignity of Somalia to Ethiopia for pure selfish clan-reasons.

In all ocupations throughout history not an entire country was occupied but the strategic locations. Thus in Somalia its Banadir (Both Shabbele regions), Hiiraan and Bay and Bakool. These regions also happen to be the economical and political power centre´s.

The other regions do not need direct occupation by military units as they are in no position to endanger the occupational country´s goals, matter of fact they are already occupied politically as they have Ethiopian ''ambassadors'' and officials residing in Hargeisa and Garowe respectively.

So the only difference between the parts that are occupied militarily and the others that are occupied politically is that the former parts are still opposed to the occupational force thus requiring a large military occupation to persuade the people to accept it, while in the latter parts the people do no need persuasion as they have already accepted to accommodate Ethiopia's wishes in their political plans (political occupation).


The Northern reactionary entities must be transformed from their current reactionairy, anti-National Interest of Somalia or they must be dissolved.

Re: Is Somalia under occupation??

Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 10:08 am
by FAH1223
The xabashi aren't in any of the cities in Hiiraan.

They are sleeping in the bush, walahi. Laughing Laughing

they only stayed in the cities like, for 2 weeks then left. Haven't been back since.

I don't get where this "Hiiraan is savage sh1t" when besides small skirmishes that haven't resonated into anything, people go on with their daily business.

Re: Is Somalia under occupation??

Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 10:58 am
by Biif Baaf
Why does every Majeerteen on this site lick Habasha arse? Don't they know Somalia is one country, if some regions are occupied, then Yes, Somalia is under occupation.

No amount of arse licking can change that.