SomaliNet Forums

It's a mistake to equate victory in an insurgency as the same thing as ability to defeat a modern army on the battlefield.
They are very different things.

France is never gonna go to war against Iran !!
Lool gurey , Kouchner +Sarkozy = Likud

I am telling you France has got nothing on Iran. But they wouldn't be alone in their quest to invade iran if that ever takes place.

As I said, give Iran 5-10 years. The only thing missing in Iran's arsenal is nuclear power, once that in place. Bring it ON.

Nukes are virtually useless, as using them is the same as committing suicide.

France can only fuc.k with 1/3 world African militias, they will never engage anything like Iran by themselves .
Funny this comes from Kouchner previously known for his work with "Medecin Sans Frontieres" { doctor without borders}
Anyway -->
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jb1W ... Kyj1HxPoJw

I don't what France done to you but you seem to give them lil more credit than they deserve. France does have good army and so does Iran. Since Nuclear war isn't what might take place, then Iran can definately take on France with homefield if and only invaded.

A question some of you never asked; why can't Iran have nuclear warheads when France has many?

Arabman,

Off the top of my head.

1. It would change the balance of power in the Middle East.

2. The nuclear non-proliferation treaties.

3. Iran does not recognize the conventions of Westphalia or the concept of diplomatic immunity.

4. Iran supports Hezbollah, a transnational Shia military and political organization whose stated goal is the destruction of Israel and the seizure of power in Lebanon and possibly Syria.

5. Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism through it's Republican Guard cells hidden in the Sunni states and all over the world.

6. A good number of countries fear the Farsi religious leadership is crazy enough to give fissionable materials suitable for a dirty bomb to one or more terrorist organizations, especially if they have no nuclear bomb themselves or lack the ability to deliver one, or if they simply think they will be caught and held responsible..

7. Realistic or not, an increasing number of countries are becoming aware of the Islamic goal of world domination and would rather see a small war now than a bigger one in five or ten years.

8. Other major players in the region, for sure Turkey and KSA, do not want to see Iran with a nuclear arsenal.

LoooooooooL@ " Islamic goal of world domination"

Right. And you believe that ? The only one speaking ANY truth, is Abizaid himself. But it's a truth the Administration doesn't want to acknowledge.

Grant world domination???

good god, isrealis have turned americans delusional.

Irans number one priority is independance.
they wish to be free from US domination, the first step towards that is having a nuclear deterant against the US armed forces stationed nearby and against the isrealis missiles already pointing at its cities.

Isreali has been pointing a gun to irans head for decades and you expect them to meekly accept it?



and diplomatic immunity? iran doesnt accept it?
if iran doesnt accpet it, why does it have diplomatic relations with allot of countries.

Westphalia treaty? what does a treaty between europeans in the 17th century have to do with irans right to self defense?

if anybody is not recognizing the treaty of westphalia it is the US,
they have already attacked occupied and conquered 2 soverign states recently and are now threatening another, and they have already destroyed the unity irreperable of iraq and it will never again become a single unified state,
thanks to americas destruction.


now who is a threat to the world?
a country that invadeds and De-constructs countries
or Iran that merley had the audacity to defend it self from Zionist and American Imperial threats.

sarkozy is an jew so he is trying to defend israel nothing new their

Sarkozy is a good man.

Let me ask you guys something. Why is the Iranian regime now so provocative in its statements, while the government of Syria, hardly a friend to the US or Israel, so restrained??? Why are so many of you supporters of a Shi'a state that is actively trying to export it's Shi'a Revolution to its neighbors???

MAC its becuase Shiaism is unexportable.

the only reason why Iran is shia in the first place is becuase the safavis ruled it fr over 200 years,

[Let me ask you guys something. Why is the Iranian regime now so provocative in its statements, while the government of Syria, hardly a friend to the US or Israel, so restrained??? Why are so many of you supporters of a Shi'a state that is actively trying to export it's Shi'a Revolution to its neighbors???]

You erroneously think that Shia Iran is the Ummah's mortal enemy. I guess that's what you wish. Wishful thinking.