SomaliNet Forums

u all skinnies missing the point


Sarkozy's aint diffrent from
all those USA coward zionist, who is the enemyof the the Muslim world
n trying indirectly 2 destory Islam/muslims
while they hiding under Ucle Sma's short skirt

basicly, Sarkozy IS a Jew Zionist
n a real Isreali protecter

Iran aka enemy of Jew want nuke Isreal

who u expecting 2 defent it?
ofcourse the jew son aka Sarkozy ,who is hiding under France clothes.

typical eh! nothing new here !



read what he says b4

"Should I remind you the visceral attachment of every Jew to Israel, as A second mother homeland? There is nothing outrageous about it. Every Jew carries within him a fear passed down through generations, and he knows that if one day he will not feel safe in his country, there will always be a place that would welcome him. And this is Israel." (From the book " *La République, les religions, l'espérance*", interviews with Thibaud Collin and Philippe Verdin

Despite the above, although Sarkozy's family roots will not bring France closer to Israel, the presidents' personal Israeli friends may. As a Minister of Interior, Sarkozy shared much common policy ground with Former Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. The two started to develop A close friendship not long ago and it is easy to observe similarities not only in their ideology and politics, but also in their public image. If Netanyahu returns to Israel's chief position it will be interesting to see whether their personal dynamic will lead to a fresh start for Israel and France, and a more constructive European role in the region.


phuck Sarkozy'

[The Omayyad, Abbaasid and Fatimid empires all got along? How about the Ottomans and the Savafids?]

You're in error, and because your knowledge in Islam and Islamic history is deficient, there's point in correcting you.

[Historical Islam is not the same as religious Islam, and you make a serious mistake in confusing the two.]

Well, Muslims understand correctly and know about Islam and Islamic history far more than you do.

[Your definition of "colony" isn't any better than your definition of "apologist".
You are trying to make pejoratives out of perfectly good words.]

The definition was "colonize", not "colony." Suffice to say, most Muslims know America is colonizing Iraq for its vast reserves of oil. What most Muslims know is more valid than what you think.

"What most Muslims know is more valid than what you think."

"What most Muslims know is more valid than what you think"

Is this suppose to be funny? Most Muslims don't know shit.