Postby Somaliweyn » Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:43 pm
Shirib,
Do not lisen to incoherent reasoning by those on the wrong side of history.
Yes, Ceyrs occupation of Lower Shabelle is something which must come to an end since no landexpansion/occupation is allowed in Somalia. The same logic applies to their JVA-remnants.
Now, the question is: Can one be against Ceyr's occupation of Lower Shabelle and at the same time against Ethiopia's occupation of Somalia?
Yes, it is a natural argument since no group is allowed to go into another group's lands and occupy it forcefully, displace the groups, destroy their livelihoods etc etc.
What traitors want us to believe: One who is against Ceyrs occupation of Lower Shabelle must be pro-Ethiopia...and pro-puppet regime. Does it make sense? Not really, what does it care to trade one kind of occupation (Ceyrs occupation of Lower Shabelle) for another kind of occupation (Ethiopia's occupation of Somalia). Isn't freedom and security what every Somali group wants? Freedom to chose their own future and govern their own lands/people without interference of other groups....Security to defend the property and people living in their own lands?
Hence, why one should oppose the Ethiopian occupation of Somalia, while at the same time speaking out against the injustices done by particular groups after 1991.