Welcome to SomaliNet Forums, a friendly and gigantic Somali centric active community. Login to hide this block

You are currently viewing this page as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, ask questions, educate others, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many, many other features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join SomaliNet forums today! Please note that registered members with over 50 posts see no ads whatsoever! Are you new to SomaliNet? These forums with millions of posts are just one section of a much larger site. Just visit the front page and use the top links to explore deep into SomaliNet oasis, Somali singles, Somali business directory, Somali job bank and much more. Click here to login. If you need to reset your password, click here. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

N.H. plans hand recount of primary ballots

Daily chitchat.

Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators

Forum rules
This General Forum is for general discussions from daily chitchat to more serious discussions among Somalinet Forums members. Please do not use it as your Personal Message center (PM). If you want to contact a particular person or a group of people, please use the PM feature. If you want to contact the moderators, pls PM them. If you insist leaving a public message for the mods or other members, it will be deleted.
OUR SPONSOR: LOGIN TO HIDE
Diblomaasi
Posts: 120
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:53 pm
Location: /dev/null

N.H. plans hand recount of primary ballots

Postby Diblomaasi » Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:11 pm

source: http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9849226-7.html

New Hampshire officials on Friday said they'll conduct a statewide hand recount of the results of Tuesday's primary in response to complaints from two underdog candidates. The last time New Hampshire conducted a statewide recount in a presidential primary was in 1980.

Dennis Kucinich, the Ohio Democratic congressman, and a Republican contender named Albert Howard, whose Web site proclaims "The Angel of the Lord told me in January of 1992 that Hillary Rodham Clinton and I would meet and be running against each other and that she would lose," will be expected to bear the costs of the recount, which is scheduled to begin Wednesday.

The exact price tag was still being determined, New Hampshire Secretary of State William Gardner said in a statement (PDF).

According to published reports, Kucinich requested the recount because of possible vote count "irregularities"--specifically, differences in results for Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama between ballots that were hand-counted--typically in smaller precincts--and ballots that were counted using a machine. Most New Hampshire voters use Diebold optical-scan machines, in which voters pencil in their choices on a piece of paper that's fed through a machine, SAT-style.

Some activists have suggested that because the numbers show that Clinton fared better in machine-counted areas, the machines were somehow hacked in her favor. The blogosphere has helped to fuel the controversy, with one Ron Paul supporter posting a painstaking breakdown of numbers from hand-counted versus machine-counted locales. (He says he's not out to push any agenda--except "that the voters on both sides be accurately represented.")

At least one computer scientist who has weighed in frequently on e-voting security issues, Princeton University Professor Ed Felten, has said the more likely explanation is demographics, not digital mischief.

According to unofficial results recorded by the Secretary of State's office, Howard received 44 votes, and Kucinich received 3,901, which represented about 1.4 percent of the total. Hillary Clinton and John McCain respectively racked up 39 and 37 percent of the Democratic and Republican vote.

"This recount isn't about who won 39 percent or 36 percent or even 1 percent," the Ohio congressman said in a recent statement. "It's about establishing whether 100 percent of the voters had 100 percent of their votes counted exactly the way they cast them."
----------------------

User avatar
*jr
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 4992
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2001 7:00 pm

Re: N.H. plans hand recount of primary ballots

Postby *jr » Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:40 pm

Good, lets recount the votes. I heard on television that almost 81% of the ballots are counted by DIEBOLD machines. DIEBOLD is a partisan Republican owned company and I sure don't trust them machines.

User avatar
razzberry
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2731
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 10:08 pm

Re: N.H. plans hand recount of primary ballots

Postby razzberry » Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:48 pm

Best news ive heard all day.

User avatar
*jr
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 4992
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2001 7:00 pm

Re: N.H. plans hand recount of primary ballots

Postby *jr » Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:29 pm

Numerous problems now being reported across the state with Diebold machines in New Hampshire. Here is the latest report.

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5553#more-5553

"Diebold Voting Machine Failures Found Across State During New Hampshire Primary

Election Officials Confrim that Employees from LHS Associates, Diebold's Sole Programmer, Vendor, and Service Provider in NH, Were Allowed to Access Vulnerable Optical-Scan Systems Throughout Election Day

Attorney General's Office Offers Conflicting Information...
Special to The BRAD BLOG by Dori Smith of Talk Nation Radio

Early research into New Hampshire wards and towns which used Diebold's AccuVote Optical-Scan voting machines during last week's Primary reveals that chronic problems continue with the company's infamous paper-ballot voting machines.

As well, the preliminary investigation reveals a great deal of confusion and conflicting information from local election clerks and a high-ranking official in the state Attorney General's office regarding protocols and security procedures for voting systems and memory cards, and how they are to be handled during Election Day failures.

All four counties I contacted on January 10th that had used Diebold's electronic machines last week reported problems during the election with the machines. Two other calls that same day turned out to have been to areas where electronic voting is not in use, where hand counts are done instead. If the small sampling is any indication, a statewide study would likely reveal that voting machines failed many times during the 2008 Presidential Primary across the entire state............"

more at the link


OUR SPONSOR: LOGIN TO HIDE

Hello, Has your question been answered on this page? We hope yes. If not, you can start a new thread and post your question(s). It is free to join. You can also search our over a million pages (just scroll up and use our site-wide search box) or browse the forums.

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “General - General Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: nnjrewzas112 and 82 guests