SomaliNet Forums

This is a PIA Advert from the 70s

looks disturbing in light of recent events

I went on it 2000...aint that bad...BA is better though...

AbdiWahab252 wrote:looks disturbing in light of recent events

Yea man. Some white dude was running around with this pic saying that the picture proves Pakistan was somehow involved in the 9/11 incident

he could have a case since Pakistan was paid over 20M a month to help with the "war on terror".

The-Screw wrote:he could have a case since Pakistan was paid over 20M a month to help with the "war on terror".

Yup. Only Ashleys and you would make a stupid comment like that

actually, i underestimated it.

"The United States is continuing to make large payments of roughly $1 billion a year to Pakistan ..."


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/20/world ... istan.html

said Friday that the payments to Pakistan since October 2001, when the war in Afghanistan began, had averaged $80 million a month.

The-Screw wrote:actually, i underestimated it.

"The United States is continuing to make large payments of roughly $1 billion a year to Pakistan ..."


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/20/world ... istan.html

That is little bit closer to the truth

[quote="The-Screw"]said Friday that the payments to Pakistan since October 2001, when the war in Afghanistan began, had averaged $80 million a month.

There are literally Billions more that goes unmentioned. 1.5 Billion USD for economic Aid. Another 1.5 Billion for Military Aid and another 1.5 Billion for Democracy. Not a bad deal at all

that's beside the point...i'm bringing this up in regards to your idiotic comment of

Yup. Only Ashleys and you would make a stupid comment like that

The-Screw wrote:that's beside the point...i'm bringing this up in regards to your idiotic comment of

Yup. Only Ashleys and you would make a stupid comment like that

Trying to pass the buck eh ladyboy? This is more stupid

he could have a case since Pakistan was paid over 20M a month to help with the "war on terror"

go ahead with the juvenile name calling. the point is that you tried to take a lame cheap shot at me and someone that isn't here, but got slapped in the face with a cold hard fact. i just owned you.

The-Screw wrote:go ahead with the juvenile name calling. the point is that you tried to take a lame cheap shot at me and someone that isn't here, but got slapped in the face with a cold hard fact. i just owned you.

Haye. You "owned me with this fact?"

he could have a case since Pakistan was paid over 20M a month to help with the "war on terror"

did you miss the part where i said "actually, i underestimated it.." and went to double check the numbers? you tell me how that comment differs from the actual fact? this game of twisting words around to avoid the reality of being momentarily owned is lame. be a man and admit that you are wrong so that the a.ss whooping might be easier to handle.