avoid at all cost madkhali and his sect (neo-salafis)

[ModerateMuslim]

these neosalafi munifaqs are everywhere nowadays - the masjid, on the net, the street, etc - breaching their satanic driven ideology. please, be very careful not to get corrupted by them - they'll only teach the way of satan, not salaf (raa).

[ModerateMuslim]

it's really amazing how much these filth misuse islam to defend their masters, arab regimes, who themselves are enslaved to the interests of zionists and westerners, not exactly allah's deen and ummah. Also it's quite ironic how they claim to be among as-salaf - of course a ridicules notion in itself - while at the same time demonizing al-jihad and the mujahideen while also singing the praisers of corrupt regimes who are mere tools for preventing the ummah from returning to the ways of as-salaf from its current jahiliyah

[Jamac_Yare]

wats diff between neo salafi and a salafi

have you forgotten the hadith of the prophet saying do not overthrow a ruler even if he is unjust and oppressive as long he establishes prayer.

[ModerateMuslim]

wats diff between neo salafi and a salafi

have you forgotten the hadith of the prophet saying do not overthrow a ruler even if he is unjust and oppressive as long he establishes prayer.

right... but the ruler has to rule with sharia/islam, too. do you see any islamic country today? no, right?

neo-salafi = fake salafis.

as-salaf = only the first three generations.

[ModerateMuslim]

this what the enemy of allah's ummah thinks of rabee and his sect:

The difficulty comes in identifying the right leader or group. The U.S. could discretely fund mainstream Salafi figures like Madkhali who are effective in siphoning off support from jihadis and who do not advocate violence (e.g. by paying for publications, lectures, new schools). This will be effective in the short term, but it further strengthens the dehumanizing Salafi ideology from which the jihadi movement derives much of its inspiration. The U.S. could also fund non-Salafis, but it currently lacks the expertise necessary to determine who is truly influential. Perhaps a better strategy in the near term would be to pressure Middle Eastern governments to allow greater political participation and visibility for groups that jihadis are threatened by. This approach should vary from country to country. For example, in Egypt, it would be the Muslim Brotherhood; in Saudi Arabia, the Shi’a. Again, it is essential that the U.S. hand not be seen.

namely: a wheel by which to destroy the ummah and islam.

[Jamac_Yare]

wats diff between neo salafi and a salafi

have you forgotten the hadith of the prophet saying do not overthrow a ruler even if he is unjust and oppressive as long he establishes prayer.

right... but the ruler has to rule with sharia/islam, too. do you see any islamic country today? no, right?

neo-salafi = fake salafis.

as-salaf = only the first three generations.

so are you calling the followers of sheik uthaymeen, albani, ibn baz neo salafis?
i do agree with you that there are ppl that say they are salafi but dont act upon salafiyah and may do that for their personal gains etc

but even if the ruler doenst rule with the proper shariah as long he establishes prayer you cant overthrow him or incite ppl to overthrow him for tht is the traits of the khawariij.
in the times of some of the salaf there were bad rulers even though the ruler did some good like capture more land 4 the muslims he wasnt a fair ruler. the salaf of that time never overthrew him.

[ModerateMuslim]

wats diff between neo salafi and a salafi

have you forgotten the hadith of the prophet saying do not overthrow a ruler even if he is unjust and oppressive as long he establishes prayer.

right... but the ruler has to rule with sharia/islam, too. do you see any islamic country today? no, right?

neo-salafi = fake salafis.

as-salaf = only the first three generations.

so are you calling the followers of sheik uthaymeen, albani, ibn baz neo salafis?
i do agree with you that there are ppl that say they are salafi but dont act upon salafiyah and may do that for their personal gains etc

but even if the ruler doenst rule with the proper shariah as long he establishes prayer you cant overthrow him or incite ppl to overthrow him for tht is the traits of the khawariij.
in the times of some of the salaf there were bad rulers even though the ruler did some good like capture more land 4 the muslims he wasnt a fair ruler. the salaf of that time never overthrew him.

to be honest with you, ibn baz did a disgraceful thing by covering for his masters (house of saud), using islam to do it. really regrettable considering how knowledgably the sheikh (AUN) was.

all current regimes in the muslim world are secular and anti-islam in nature - not any better than the monglos were. so, the isamic thing to do is - overthrow them all!

[Jamac_Yare]

to be honest with you, ibn baz did a disgraceful thing by covering for his masters (house of saud), using islam to do it. really regrettable considering how knowledgably the sheikh (AUN) was.

all current regimes in the muslim world are secular and anti-islam in nature - not any better than the monglos were. so, the isamic thing to do is - overthrow them all!

is bin laden and his likes sheiks and potential muslim leaders to you ?