Voltage wrote:Kolombo are you serious in your statement there?
Indhacade said yesterday Sheikh Shariif has joined the oppressors, Sheikh Dahir Aweys called him a renegade who represents no one, and Abu Mansuur said he has nothing to do with our resistance movement.
What do you know that is not out there?
Coincidentally those three individuals represent the factions that were radical and played the major role in declaring Jihad and talking all tough with the ultimatums at a time they were not in a position to act like that.
Also, at this current time, the three individuals represent factions that are so radical that they only think linear, while losing many other important variables out of the equation.
For example, we have a humanitarian crisis in Somalia (Benadir), the Ethiopians have been pinned down, the West has realized its errors in financing and backing the Christian-Ethiopian state's policy in Somalia, and the resistance movement has failed to spread beyond the known places/regions.
If this is the setting, how can we achieve:
A)The defeated Ehiopians out of Somalia,
B) The humanitarian crisis to be resolved
C) The Somali people to initiate the development of their own political institutions.
If Sh.Shariif's faction says they can achieve point A and B, and are prepared to take into accomodation the different Somali group's wishes in the approach of point C, why shouldnt people welcome his efforts?
---
As for Alshabab, and Aweys faction,
They are so radical as to not negotiate with their own respective subclans and support groups let alone with others. Clearly, they do not care for point B and C, and only want to achieve point A through sheer force. Which ironically enough they do not posses, also the public support for them diminishes since they have clearly disrecarded point B, C and do not want to consider other options for achieving point A.