Madkhali to the Bone!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xxuc03GEEeA
Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators


Executive wrote:Ilahaay ka cabso




The difficulty comes in identifying the right leader or group. The U.S. could discretely fund mainstream Salafi figures like Madkhali who are effective in siphoning off support from jihadis and who do not advocate violence (e.g. by paying for publications, lectures, new schools). This will be effective in the short term, but it further strengthens the dehumanizing Salafi ideology from which the jihadi movement derives much of its inspiration. The U.S. could also fund non-Salafis, but it currently lacks the expertise necessary to determine who is truly influential. Perhaps a better strategy in the near term would be to pressure Middle Eastern governments to allow greater political participation and visibility for groups that jihadis are threatened by. This approach should vary from country to country. For example, in Egypt, it would be the Muslim Brotherhood; in Saudi Arabia, the Shi’a. Again, it is essential that the U.S. hand not be seen.


Kolombo wrote:Somali-Star,
You must have me confused with someone else sxb, I can't stand Salafis/Madkhalis.


FAH1223 wrote:Kolombo wrote:Somali-Star,
You must have me confused with someone else sxb, I can't stand Salafis/Madkhalis.
he included you because you support sheikh sharif
and somali-star says he is a murtad


abakar20 wrote:somali star, what if your alshabaab freinds join him? will you change your mind?

Return to “General - General Discussions”
Users browsing this forum: nnjrewzas112 and 12 guests