Ka darag wrote::lol:![]()
SHES PROB TALKING BOUT SPEEDING CAMERAS
LOL
I just got a image of that
Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators
Ka darag wrote::lol:![]()
SHES PROB TALKING BOUT SPEEDING CAMERAS

Meredith wrote:
No, my hat was said to be obscuring my vision and therefore i had to take it off.
If my hat [and it wasn't that big] is not allowed, why on Gods green earth should a Niqab be allowed?
Well past that stage but thanks.
CCTV, identification.
How can the police identify a person?


Diyeeshaha_Tolka wrote:qofna qasab kuma ahan inuu dagnaado wadanka france,,so you either live by their rules or leave the country.

Ka darag wrote:DAILY MAIL COLUMIST...![]()

Meredith wrote:Ka darag wrote:DAILY MAIL COLUMIST...![]()
Don't be so ignorant.
I'm a Guardian and Telegraph reader thank you very much.
I like to broaden my horizon past trash.
Ka darag wrote:LOL IM NOT BEING IGNORANT..IM JUS LAUGHING AT WAT ERUDITE SAID...JOOW AA BAL TAN EEGA![]()
![]()

Meredith wrote:surrender wrote:excuses excuses excuses!![]()
The law and rules are just that. And Niqab or not, Muslim or not. No one is above the law of the land.
If a women wishes the law to satisfy her and her to be able to what she wants with a Niqab, then move to a Muslim country.
Does the niqab satisfy the minimal visual field for driving?
I highly doubt it.



Return to “General - General Discussions”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], nnjrewzas112 and 80 guests