Killing Innocent Civilians in Warfare

[ciyaal_warta]

killing innocent pple is a sin in every religion period

[The Nomad]

killing innocent pple is a sin in every religion period

Wrong.

Not in Judaism, Christianity and Islam.

Learn a little.

[kambuli]

Killers have different names..Some beautiful names some ugly names..I don't care what name they have, I don't care which country, group or individual is doing..I hate killers Everyone loves his/her love why take another life in the name of whatever...I hate killers

[hypereffective]

Somali-Americans like Ismahan123 & FAH1223 are guilty of indirectly killing innocent civilians. See, their votes helped elect president Obama. President Obama is responsible for the Farah massacre and countless other massacres in Muslim countries. In those massacres, American troops intentionally killed innocent civilians, lied about it, covered it up, and when the truth was revealed by the Red Cross and Afghanistan's government, they admitted to it. Now, it's one thing if Somali-Americans were forced at gunpoint to vote for Obama, but that wasn't so. In fact, they had the option to stay at home and not cast any vote, as millions of American's do in every presidential election. Their argument that they elected Obama for local reasons, i.e. bettering the economy, is poor and unconvincing. Obama or Democrats do not possess a magical solution for America's terminall-ill economy. The same federal reserve chairman, Ben Bernanke, who served Bush is serving Obama. The fact that the economy has worsened under Obama's administration is clear proof that there's nothing Democrats can do better than Republicans when it comes to bettering the economy. Millions of Americans are awash in debt, lost their jobs, savings, home and everything dear/valuable to them. That happened (and still happens) under Obama's rule. The other thing, it's very troubling casting your vote for a president to better the economy while ignoring the high probability of that president issuing executive orders that intentionally cause the killing of innocent civilians. How can one reconcile the two? In any case, you have lost for electing Obama; the economy is getting worse, and innocent civilians were killed as a result of electing your commander in chief.

[FAH1223]

Somali-Americans like Ismahan123 & FAH1223 are guilty of indirectly killing innocent civilians. See, their votes helped elect president Obama. President Obama is responsible for the Farah massacre and countless other massacres in Muslim countries. In those massacres, American troops intentionally killed innocent civilians, lied about it, covered it up, and when the truth was revealed by the Red Cross and Afghanistan's government, they admitted to it. Now, it's one thing if Somali-Americans were forced at gunpoint to vote for Obama, but that wasn't so. In fact, they had the option to stay at home and not cast any vote, as millions of American's do in every presidential election. Their argument that they elected Obama for local reasons, i.e. bettering the economy, is poor and unconvincing. Obama or Democrats do not possess a magical solution for America's terminall-ill economy. The same federal reserve chairman, Ben Bernanke, who served Bush is serving Obama. The fact that the economy has worsened under Obama's administration is clear proof that there's nothing Democrats can do better than Republicans when it comes to bettering the economy. Millions of Americans are awash in debt, lost their jobs, savings, home and everything dear/valuable to them. That happened (and still happens) under Obama's rule. The other thing, it's very troubling casting your vote for a president to better the economy while ignoring the high probability of that president issuing executive orders that intentionally cause the killing of innocent civilians. How can one reconcile the two? In any case, you have lost for electing Obama; the economy is getting worse, and innocent civilians were killed as a result of electing your commander in chief.

hes been in office for 6 months, and you expected him to clean up 8 years of the mess Bush left

[hypereffective]

hes been in office for 6 months, and you expected him to clean up 8 years of the mess Bush left

So, how do you reconcile with the fact that you elected a president who has caused the killing of innocent civilians? Is bettering your economy more important than the lives of those innocent civilians? BTW, the Farah massacre occurred on May 4, 2009; under Obama's rule.

[noticeable]

Salama alaikom kuligin

[hypereffective]

Salama alaikom kuligin

Wa calaykum salaam. Welcome to Somalinet.

[noticeable]

why does it take so long to make a post on here, it took about 5 minutes just to make 1 post.

[hypereffective]

why does it take so long to make a post on here, it took about 5 minutes just to make 1 post.

A poster who is mad at the moderators is flooding the forum. The flooding affects the server, making it slow.

[SummerRain]

Somali-Americans like Ismahan123 & FAH1223 are guilty of indirectly killing innocent civilians. See, their votes helped elect president Obama. President Obama is responsible for the Farah massacre and countless other massacres in Muslim countries. In those massacres, American troops intentionally killed innocent civilians, lied about it, covered it up, and when the truth was revealed by the Red Cross and Afghanistan's government, they admitted to it. Now, it's one thing if Somali-Americans were forced at gunpoint to vote for Obama, but that wasn't so. In fact, they had the option to stay at home and not cast any vote, as millions of American's do in every presidential election. Their argument that they elected Obama for local reasons, i.e. bettering the economy, is poor and unconvincing. Obama or Democrats do not possess a magical solution for America's terminall-ill economy. The same federal reserve chairman, Ben Bernanke, who served Bush is serving Obama. The fact that the economy has worsened under Obama's administration is clear proof that there's nothing Democrats can do better than Republicans when it comes to bettering the economy. Millions of Americans are awash in debt, lost their jobs, savings, home and everything dear/valuable to them. That happened (and still happens) under Obama's rule. The other thing, it's very troubling casting your vote for a president to better the economy while ignoring the high probability of that president issuing executive orders that intentionally cause the killing of innocent civilians. How can one reconcile the two? In any case, you have lost for electing Obama; the economy is getting worse, and innocent civilians were killed as a result of electing your commander in chief.

The way I see it, I voted for the lesser of two evils. In any gov't or adminstration, innocent civilians will suffer and be killed. That is a given. However, had McBush and Pig lipstick ( who mind you, couldn't handle the affairs of Alaska let alone be the VP of USA) took office, we would've probably bigger mess than Bush left and far more distruction in their hands than Obama will wish to do in his time in office entirely.

[hypereffective]

The way I see it, I voted for the lesser of two evils. In any gov't or adminstration, innocent civilians will suffer and be killed. That is a given. However, had McBush and Pig lipstick ( who mind you, couldn't handle the affairs of Alaska let alone be the VP of USA) took office, we would've probably bigger mess than Bush left and far more distruction in their hands than Obama will wish to do in his time in office entirely.

What's your analysis on "bigger mess" based on? Can you cite some statistics comparing Obama to Bush (even for 6 months)? Can you show that fewer Muslims have been killed or displaced under Obama's rule? Your argument that you voted for "the lesser of two evils" is poor and illogical. You aren't better than millions of Americans who chose not to vote. You could have exercised the right not to vote, and you wouldn't have lost your rights/status, your job, your citizenship, your grants/scholarships (if you're a student), etc. SMH.

[FAH1223]

The way I see it, I voted for the lesser of two evils. In any gov't or adminstration, innocent civilians will suffer and be killed. That is a given. However, had McBush and Pig lipstick ( who mind you, couldn't handle the affairs of Alaska let alone be the VP of USA) took office, we would've probably bigger mess than Bush left and far more distruction in their hands than Obama will wish to do in his time in office entirely.

What's your analysis on "bigger mess" based on? Can you cite some statistics comparing Obama to Bush (even for 6 months)? Can you show that fewer Muslims have been killed or displaced under Obama's rule? Your argument that you voted for "the lesser of two evils" is poor and illogical. You aren't better than millions of Americans who chose not to vote. You could have exercised the right not to vote, and you wouldn't have lost your rights/status, your job, your citizenship, your grants/scholarships (if you're a student), etc. SMH.

we wanted a black president with a muslim sounding name whos from east africa

[hypereffective]

we wanted a black president with a muslim sounding name whos from east africa

Now that you have such a president, what's next?

[American-Suufi]

we wanted a black president with a muslim sounding name whos from east africa

Now that you have such a president, what's next?

arabman while u defend omer bashir of sudan who killed millions of darfurian muslims and whose mouth is stuck to china's ass (remember him and the muslim leaders like iran never criticised china for their transgression against chinese muslims), this is what obama has to say to the chinese defending chinese muslims against china's brutality.

“Just as we respect China’s ancient culture and remarkable achievements, we also strongly believe that the religion and culture of all peoples must be respected and protected and that all people should be free to speak their minds,” Obama said. “That includes ethnic and religious minorities in China, as surely as it includes minorities within the United States.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/07 ... z0MaVw50nn

u dudes r programmed by people whose self-political interests outweigh their belief in defending their fellow muslims.

did ahmednjad or omer bashir comment on china's brutality against uigher muslims? NO.

viva obama