A LOVE epiphany!

[Basra-]

Land marking, ground breaking! Analysis by Basra elmi bodheri.



I was watching a taped show of the medical serious, House. They featured a patient- a hot sexy mama, who had an ugly-fugli husband. The patient has some anomaly undiagnosed disease, but throught the show--the medical stuff discover she is really a psychopath who she uses her husband because of his trust fund. One of the female doctors--warns the man that his wife doesnt love her. He responds by saying-- i like the way she makes me feel. I know, she doesnt love me. I want her around me.


This gave me an idea right away. LOVE in a woman is irrelevant. It is useless. A woman doesnt have to be inlove to marry or be happy. But a man is. After all-- a man needs to have an erection---and he needs something or someone to maintain that erection and i need not say--a sprung-ed inlove man is capable of having and maintaining one. And not to mention that--in a social setting-- a man is the one who picks who he wants to marry or date. Not the other way around. The women stay useless in waiting to be picked. (with the exception of the few women who are aggressive of course-- but those women get submissive almost gay men in nature, and thats a whole total different story. lol) Socially, a man has the upper hand on who he will and who he will not bed. So, essentially, this begs the question---the specie woman : is she really an irrelevant specie at all???.

Is the woman just a vessel for the man's needs? Eve was created for the convenience of Adam, that is after the creation of a Adam, and not to mention, created from part of Adam-- his rib. Therefore, my conclusion is----Man needs to be in- Love and Woman needs a man in-love.

[Sir-Luggoyo]

Feeri Feeri good analysis. Now, let's see how Somalis described this phenomenon ions gone.

A man named Ali Dhuux Adan recited a poem, even though the poem was not literally about the issue at hand, he somehow insinuated the submissive nature of the female species.

Naagahaan dhankii loo rogiyo dhinacna diideyne
Dhedigaanshahaa lagu arkiyo dhiigga caadada'e
Haddaanay dhiilka caana ah lahayn laguma dhateene

Basically, in the first line, he is indicating when in bed, you can turn them any side you please in the middle of the heat and do them in any style you fancy, likewise, in all aspects of life

[gobdoon]

What century do you live S.Lug nice poem from the era of Sir Calidhuux but that may not work nowadays especially in the West where your wife can claim you raped and you would be prosecuted as just like raping a stranger.

[rashid22]

[Jamac_Yare]

Basra i didnt know you love T-Pain

[qoraxeey]

Habar walan Basra

u really hate beign a woman
loooool

[nomadicwarlord]

Say no to Drugs.

[Oxy-]

I know for a fact whenever I open a thread of yours - somewhere along the lines in reading it I will giggle at a point you make.





For centuries it was common place for women who wanted to be wealthy to marry a rich husband. Seeing as though female rights were so primitive, and women rarely made $$$ - A woman’s only way for an idyllic lifestyle was through a man with a deep pocket.

Provided of course she has the looks. Girls can always rely on their appearance to help them out in life’s most basic need - Money. This is oppositely true for men. If a man is poor – no matter how good looking, he can never rely on his looks for financial dependency.

So in a way, females have an advantage of survival. If a girl has money, no biggie – She can then fall in love with a man she’s attracted to. If she’s broke, well then $$$ comes before love in life’s priority list. So therefore she can rely on looks and be out-of-love with a man she marries.