Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators




Well the argument against homosexuality is that you are having sex with a person of the same sex and thus it is wrong. The argument with incest is u are having sex with a person of your immediate family and thus wrongi think incest is way worse.

Exactly. They try to emmulate the ancient greeks and romans soo much. Most of their "culture" was just taken from greece and rome. If some historian makes a new discovery that either julius caesar or Alexander the great slept with their sisters, then expect incest to be allowed as wellBecause western ppl love greeks. Thats why homoism is accepted.

because incest breaks the family apart and damages the families mental state. you can argue that khaniisimo breaks family apart which is true but the mental health of the familly unit is not affected and incest is heavly linked to children being abused while khaniisnimo is two adults consent in there lifestyle.Well the argument against homosexuality is that you are having sex with a person of the same sex and thus it is wrong. The argument with incest is u are having sex with a person of your immediate family and thus wrongi think incest is way worse.
The arguments pretty much are the same, so why then is one illegal and the other legal?

im just thinking to make sense of their logic, the homo people are just grown up people making decission to have different sexual life style, society shouldnt care what 2 adults doing behind their closed doors.Well the argument against homosexuality is that you are having sex with a person of the same sex and thus it is wrong. The argument with incest is u are having sex with a person of your immediate family and thus wrongi think incest is way worse.
The arguments pretty much are the same, so why then is one illegal and the other legal?
So why is incest illegal in the west while homosexuality is allowed? Isn't the argument for the two pretty much the same? Isn't it hypocritical to make one illegal, while saying the other is ok?
Discuss



What if two adults, who happen to be related decide to have sex, why should the law care, what they do behind their closed doors.im just thinking to make sense of their logic, the homo people are just grown up people making decission to have different sexual life style, society shouldnt care what 2 adults doing behind their closed doors.Well the argument against homosexuality is that you are having sex with a person of the same sex and thus it is wrong. The argument with incest is u are having sex with a person of your immediate family and thus wrongi think incest is way worse.
The arguments pretty much are the same, so why then is one illegal and the other legal?
on other hand incent may lead to other legal issues as if they have kids and what will be consequences and their title in the society and damages family.

Vague, elaborateSo why is incest illegal in the west while homosexuality is allowed? Isn't the argument for the two pretty much the same? Isn't it hypocritical to make one illegal, while saying the other is ok?
Discuss
The outcomes are different.



Well Homosexuality is an act of adults with a malfunction in their psychosexual development causing them to find more pleasure in acts normal people find perverse.
Incest cannot be consider in the same category as homosexuality for the simple reason it exposes the volnerable. Incest does not help with population control and would actually lead to a population spike.
I would say there is greater benefit in allowing Beastiality which would help with population control. Only problem is how do you ask animals if they are ok with the act?
The best alternative in the future is Artificial partners and robbots. This will solve many socially deviant behaviours and also address the global population control variable. The perfect solution to all of man's problems.
The Future is AI

Return to “General - General Discussions”
Users browsing this forum: nnjrewzas112 and 72 guests