^He's either a rather provocative character that feeds off from controversy, or he simply thinks we are all a bunch of ignorant boobs who do not know their sphincters from their spleens.
Either case, he needs a reality check.
Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators

Homosexual relationships are a universal phenomena in the animal kingdom, being observed in creatures ranging from bison to penguins and hundreds of other species. Like I told you before, there are dozens of scientific studies that show homosexual behavior is inherent to an individual, and not a lifestyle choice as you and other ignorant people claim. You are free to research them for yourself, as I don't have the will nor energy to research it for you. Your own prejudices against homosexuality have turned you completely hostile to even considering the legitimacy of my point, so I doubt debating with you will make much difference.LMAO!Incest is not natural or healthy, while homosexuality is a natural phenomena that probably serves an evolutionary purpose. Putting homosexuality on the same moral plane as incest is wrong and disgusting.
And how does homosexuality fit in with the prime directive that defines evolution? You know, the innate desire shared universally by all living things to want to multiply and replicate, from single-cell protozoans to highly complex members of the animal kingdom. How on earth can homo (same) sexuality in anyway fit in with copulatory imperative of males? It defies all the theories that define gene replication and the copulatory functionality of living things in general, not just humans. What's the outcome of a homosexual relationship? Its often times zero off-spring, zero chance of having one's genes living on, it means death and ceasation for the living organism. Its an illogical and ludicrous farce and in no way fits in with the natural order.
You strike me as a highly apologetic individual who is so consumed by his desire to fit in, to sound politically correct that he ends up contradicting himself. Settle for complacency all you want, but don't attempt to insert evolutionary biology in to homosexuality, there is no correlation. First it was homosexuality is genetic, then when that claim was refuted & debunked, you come to us with an even more laughable claim that homosexuality is somehow a natural and evolutionary pattern. Do you even understand what constitutes evolution and the laws that govern it?
I see the point you are trying to make. I guess it's just because incest isn't all that common, while homosexuals make up between 5-10% of the population. And I haven't seen much science behind the purpose of incestuous relationships, other than those speaking about horrible genetic disorders rising from it.How did you come to the conclusion that one is natural while the other is not?Incest is not natural or healthy, while homosexuality is a natural phenomena that probably serves an evolutionary purpose. Putting homosexuality on the same moral plane as incest is wrong and disgusting.




Return to “General - General Discussions”
Users browsing this forum: nnjrewzas112 and 73 guests