James, read this NY Times responses:
pierce.moffett
portland, or
November 27th, 2010
4:04 pm
So the FBI protected us from a plot that was entirely manufactured by FBI. Thanks a lot guys, what would we do without you?
since1982
NYC, USA
November 27th, 2010
4:04 pm
This looks like an illegal form of entrapment. Having a desire to commit terrorist acts is not considered a probable cause. Especially for someone with his background. With a good lawyer he should be released within a year.
Carolyn Egeli
Valley Lee, Md.
November 27th, 2010
4:51 pm
I wonder how far this young man would have really gone without the "aid" of the FBI. Rather than encouraging him and almost setting him up or entrapping him, wouldn't it have been better to find a way to change his mind? Instead, a young life is ruined. At nineteen, he was ripe for propaganda, desiring to prove his manhood. How many young people do we send to Afghanistan and Iraq with the collateral damage of maiming their civilians in our aggression? Do they not feel that our children are their equalivant of terrorists? Yet at that age, attaching oneself to a cause larger than ones self is a standard recruiting devise for our military. How mindless is war? whether it is in Oregon, Afghanistan or Korea! Why can't our American children have something else to do besides going to war to support huge international corporate interests that are not necessarily for our own country's benefit. It is ever thus, in the history of wars. Peace is much harder work, and much more rewarding, but not for the cynical ones that make their livings on war. The story about this young man in his delusion, which is not so unusual for any boy that age, is sad. Raised on video games and popular culture most likely, he was probably looking for something to do with himself that mattered. It is time for all of us to be grown ups, and take care of our children rather than breed to feed a military industrial machine. Shame on us!
pierce.moffett
portland, or
November 27th, 2010
4:51 pm
@Karen and others - your family would not have been injured. There was no bomb. The FBI spent months "cultivating" this guy and encouraging him to bomb something, gave him bomb training, money, and even a fake bomb to "detonate." This is an etirely fabricated incident in which no one was ever actually in any danger. Yet another bogus government exercise designed to scare everyone into doing what they're told.
Kris
Washington
November 27th, 2010
5:48 pm
So, the FBI has now manufactured more cases of domestic terrorism than terrorists? this is standard operations: go to the poorest, most muslim areas of urban America and spend thousands of taxpayer dollars on informants who get people to hang out with them because they give them cars, food, ect... to "collect" information about jihadists. Do you know how much money informants are paid to convince people to become terrorists? upwards of 250,000 thousand dollars a year. come on, NYTIMES, this is pathetic. and, i'm sorry to those of you portlanders, there would be NO THREAT and no bombing if the FBI hadn't given this guy a bomb...the FBI is better at creating terrorist plots than catching terrorists that might actually pose a threat...who are not going to be pursuaded by men known to communities to be a paid government informants...shame on the Times.
Grace
NORTH of MASON DIXIE LINE, USA
November 27th, 2010
5:48 pm
The FBI "trained him to detonate the bomb"? hmmmmm sounds like entrapement to me. Perhaps I am missing something here, seems the young man only expressed a desire to kill several hundred people. I hate to say this but you will find sentiments of this kind in every community. Really you can. And if I have to convinced you as a reader, perhaps you are living in a gated commmunity.
The article could best serve the readers if the author would include the elements of the crime which this person is charged. I respectfully and strongly suggest the NYTimes implement this enhancement in articles discussing crimanal acts.
Patrick
Long Island NY
November 27th, 2010
5:48 pm
Thank you for your truly objective reporting. This is just another scam by the FBI encompassing many decades. It was obviously timed for maximum exposure on a major holiday. Just like the devil encourages temptation, so did they.
Additionally, the Feds are demonstrating the governments affinity to further terrorism which lends support to the "9-11 inside job" theorists. Now it is harder for them to say it wasnt.
There seems to be a decade long encouragment of terrorism by the military and their feds, almost to justify their never ending wars. The only real mandate for peace by our war weary citizens was the election of Obama. Now he has turned his back on his people and retreated into the talons of the military political hawks. Was he psychologically kidnapped or manipulated? The reality is what the people want, not the insulated staff of the government.
This case was the obvious manipulation of a young and angry, immature young man. Just like the military molds the minds of young students.
Scam after scam. Propoganda after propoganda. He is guilty of being entraped, but not a crime, which did not occur. The true conspirators are the FBI. Perhaps they have too many agents and not enough crimes.
History will expose them.
This was clearly propoganda.
Paul Adams
Stony Brook
November 27th, 2010
5:48 pm
The guy's a TEENAGER! Teenagers of all religions and races do stupid things, especially now the internet makes things easy and temptation ubiquitous, but luckily few of them are aided and abetted by the FBI. Teenagers don't even have fully developed brains; neither it seems do FBI agents, and I fear the whole nation has an underdeveloped heart.
Bill Delamain
San Francisco
November 27th, 2010
6:32 pm
OK - that teen had serious psychological issues BUT I think they framed a kid who was intellectually weak. Instead of arresting people who do not represent a real threat (that teen was a potential threat, not a real one), they should arrest people who are REAL terrorists. It is too easy to take a disturbed teen and influence him into some weird behavior and then arrest him and tell everybody you're a hero, that you're doing your job well and so on. You're wasting our tax money fabricating criminals from mentally disturbed people and then claiming you anti-terrorist programs work.
I am surprised at the number of responses in most articles where people see an emotionally disturbed and gullible kid was prodded towards a path he may or may not have taken.