Postby Murax » Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:08 pm
As a hole I think this theory is pretty much hogwash. Not only is it unrealistic but it is grossly unnecessary.
First of all with the way The Human mind works people have different strengths/talents in certain subject areas as compared to weak areas (relative to their strength in certian subject areas). Some people are very apt at memorizing, Some are better at understanding. Some people excel at the public speaking/presentation some are better with more analytical subject areas like Engineering, Math, Computer Science/IT and others. Yet some of these "geeky" Engineer/Math gurus will not be able to for the life of them stand in front of a executive board and be able to effectively and confidently make a presentation in front of them, while some people can do that easily. What makes a society more "educated" is the value and weight that society collectively puts on education. Take India a very educated and advanced society for example. At My University who's Engineering/IT factulty is dominated with Indian Professors, I've had casual off the record converstions with some noteworthy Professors from that Country that have won awards about the Indian Education system status. They were laughing telling me how much of a ridiculous assumption it is that Indians are "smarter" than Americans or other races, which is what the arguement a lot of American students would make when struggling with Math/Engineering. He talked about how the difference between Indians and other races is how Education is viewed there. In a nation of over a billion people with scarce recourses, kids are taught very early in their childhood if You do not study Your ass off, You will live a life of severe poverty. Its this mentality that India is today the leader in Software Engineering/Development and is the source of skilled labor all over the world. You can bring similar examples in Japan.
"Smart" or not smart the student's motivation/drive is what will ultimately give Him success in academia and eventually be able to let that person achieve accolades. One will NOT be able to get by Academia if they are not willing to sit down, and put in the time plain and simp;le. One will not be able to understand Integration in Calculus just because He's "Smart". I saw You make a reference to the Somalis who went to Somalia to fight for Shishkabab. Yes I have noticed that Somalis in America/West have been a major dissapointment (Especially the males) when it comes to education. This in my opinion is due more to the fact that unfortunately Somalis being refugees, and having to take whatever public housing is available to them were put in low income, crime ridden, horrible school system areas that were not conducive at all towards a young Man being able to succeed academically. I think putting Somalis in better neighobrhoods/school systems will immedietely be able to see dividends in America. As for in Somalia, I mean education right now is the least of their priorities when the most basic human necessities are unavailable.
All in all Your theory about selectively chosing who should be given a chance for an education and who shouldn't, by some selection process is ludicrious. Here in the States the way talent is recognized is through little stuff You wouldn't expect like Science Fairs, Book clubs, etc. once the talent is identified they're then put in more challenging, stimulating classes (Gifted and Talented) and it goes from there to Ivy League schools, post education (Masters) PhD, etc. but where did it all start? Those science fairs when the kid was 6-7 nobody thought of, but at the end of the day the credit goes to the Paren tof that child that challenged he/she to enter into it, put effort into it and it walloped to something special.