Noblebrah, again I must stress that Somaliland does indeed get foreign aid. I disagree with the statement provided in your last quote about "ineligibility" for foreign aid. Like I said, Somaliland is not a recognized and independent country so it is not eligible for loans and other types of aid (which is a great thing for Somaliland considering what these types of "aid" has done to Africa), but indeed Somaliland does get foreign aid through humanitarian, civic-building, society-supporting aid. Even the presidential election took place largely with foreign humanitarian aid and I remember the electoral commission once saying it is impossible it would take place without more foreign monetary support.
So Somaliland is not eligible for loans, grants, involvement from world banks, etc but that isn't to say Somaliland doesn't get foreign aid. Somaliland's
yearly budget is almost always in the tens of millions per year. That is an exceedingly small amount for a nation while at the same time it gets more than its yearly budget in humanitarian aid per year. In fact, from that you can infer Somaliland is one of the most aid dependent aid "countries" on earth.
During that same year, only the US gave 160 million in Aid to Somalia. Add Britain, France, Netherlands, Italy, Norway, Japan, Canada, Australia, etc and then estimate the cut Somaliland would get as a major region counted within Somalia and you can see that there would have been more "aid" given to Somaliland than its budget could ever reach, over a 100% percentile in fact.
So to conclude, Somaliland is not eligible for loans/grants/etc which is the only aid the Daily Mail and that article took into consideration (so-called "dead aid" and the one most anti-aid people concentrate on since they can't legitimately attack humanitarian aid) but Somaliland as part of Somalia, the most failed state, has seen its own tremendous cut of humanitarian aid. Of course they all come under foreign aid which is why then you cannot say Somaliland is not dependent on foreign aid.
As for the accountability part, I tend to explain it as a shared history fighting against Barre and an over-zealous union of shared objectives (recognition) that keeps Somaliland accountable to its own people; after all the one issue where they try so hard to distinguish themselves from Somalia is the free and democratic card. Why would any Somaliland official want to go down the road where that is a false statement?