Postby Warsame101 » Sun Sep 25, 2011 11:16 am
I believe some of the comments in this topics re-inforce my position that Somalis as a whole save a few, have this preconceived notion that they can figure someone's school of thought and his collection of opinion based on his tribal affiliation.
I specifically mentioned in my initial post:
It includes both his postive and negative impacts by scrutinizing his actions from a neutral point of view.
For those who have trouble deciphering this crucial point; it means that the book will be free from the unsubstantiated 'facts' that has been circulating the minds of many Somalis since the inception of the Somali civil war.
It will only look at substantiated events and detail them, leaving it to the reader to decide what to make of it.
I have gone the extra effort, on dodging oral history and the countless versions that each Somali group has formulated, and made sure I referenced the points in the book based on the written records dating from that period.