Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators
I don't talk about dhegcas negative or positive, wax iga galeey baa jirin. I worry more about what I do and less about what others doYes, only talk about dhegcas when they do something positive. Otherwise, brush their negative under the rug.Somalida are jealous naago, bal maxaa kagalay what arab's do? SMH
quote from comments sectionLiberal moderates like Prof. Subhi make me sick.
The women themselves are the problem. Cover them up totally, and their eyes, then keep them in underground bunkers so they can't tempt me into doing anything. I saw one trying to reverse into a space outside Waitrose the other day and the sight was so distressing I was forced to buy a pile of jizz mags and go cottaging.
Still does not justify banning women from driving. Why dont they ban women from going outside their house while they at it, since they should "stay in their houses" and "abide quietly in their homes"Read the Quran, it commands the very same thingWhy you hate women, brah?Mashallah, I agree 100% what Saudi government banned women driving, because women they are not allowed to travel without a mahram. If so, why do they need to drive it doesn't make sense? It will lead to more fitnah spreading and women escaping their fathers and brothers. I agree 100% with saudi ban on women driving, it makes complete sense.
“And abide quietly in your homes, and do not flaunt your charms as they used to flaunt them in the old days of pagan ignorance; and be constant in prayer, and render the purifying dues, and pay heed unto Allah and His Messenger: for Allah only wants to remove from you all that might be loathsome, O you members of the [Prophet’s] household, and to purify you to utmost purity.” [33:33]
According to Tafsir ibn Kathir, ”And stay in your houses” means “stay in your houses and do not come out except for an urgent purpose"
For anyone having trouble correlated women driving and an increase in homosexual activity:quote from comments sectionLiberal moderates like Prof. Subhi make me sick.
The women themselves are the problem. Cover them up totally, and their eyes, then keep them in underground bunkers so they can't tempt me into doing anything. I saw one trying to reverse into a space outside Waitrose the other day and the sight was so distressing I was forced to buy a pile of jizz mags and go cottaging.
then I was like 
They forgot “Don’t run out of burning building without your hijab and mahram”At first I was like
So giving women the right to drive now causes "aids" and "generations with no known fathers"?we shouldn't just start criticizing them because, perhaps, they know something we don't. my opinion is that this is just another propaganda by the west intended to demonize Islam and particularly the kingdom of Saudi Arabia for its strict laws and for refusing to adopt western-sponsored laws that basically invite women to prostitution and thus increasing the risk of non-treatable diseases, such as Aids and generations with no known fathers.
first; wearing Niqab and driving not so good idea.
second; it's not like the west is free of laws that doesn't make any sense talk about them for a change
And I couldn't care less . I have more empathy for monkeys than arab women
iyaga u taala. If they are unsatisfied with how things are they should do something about it by themselves. Who are to speak for them
I have zero sympathy for dhegacs women. Waa arin ayaga u taalo. But we have many Wahabi garbage ass lickers on here, and they support shit like this. They want to treat our women as atrocious as these Saudis treat theirsExactly . It is as you said more to do with the over-bearing power of the state whether it be secular or non-secular in nature.You know the funny thing is, despite the outward facade, the general population isn't the most religious in the Arab world. Read this:
But the gap in self-defined religiosity between Saudis on the one hand, and Iranians, Jordanians and Egyptians on the other, was so great that it challenged the prevalent perception of Saudi Arabia as a highly conservative and religious society. Indeed, actions spoke louder than words: Only 28 percent of Saudis said that they participated in weekly religious services, compared to 27 percent of Iranians, 44 percent of Jordanians, 42 percent of Egyptians and 45 percent of Americans.
These findings, while running contrary to popular perceptions of Saudi culture, were less startling than they appeared. Sociologists of religion have long argued that in a monolithic religious environment, or when religious institutions are closely tied to the state, the overall religiosity of the public declines.
Read more: http://www.dailystar.com.lb/Opinion/Com ... z1fQ3WePbK
(The Daily Star :: Lebanon News :: http://www.dailystar.com.lb)
How about that for some irony. By tying the religion to a despotic state, its actually done the opposite and turned people off religion. How ironic is it that Egyptians/Jordanians are more religious despite living under a state that doesn't mandate religion? No irony that Iranians and Saudis are both less religious. There power run amock ends up doing a great disservice.
To the same point when secularists( who mimic Western values and aren't in tune with the majority) try to impose this on the general population it never works. Look at Tunisia and Turkey where hijab was banned and beards could get you jailed by secret police( Tunisia). Now look who is in power. Moral of the story is power of the state should be limited regardless of its supposed goals.
Return to “General - General Discussions”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], nnjrewzas112 and 80 guests
