Welcome to SomaliNet Forums, a friendly and gigantic Somali centric active community. Login to hide this block

You are currently viewing this page as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, ask questions, educate others, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many, many other features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join SomaliNet forums today! Please note that registered members with over 50 posts see no ads whatsoever! Are you new to SomaliNet? These forums with millions of posts are just one section of a much larger site. Just visit the front page and use the top links to explore deep into SomaliNet oasis, Somali singles, Somali business directory, Somali job bank and much more. Click here to login. If you need to reset your password, click here. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Which is worse?

Daily chitchat.

Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators

Forum rules
This General Forum is for general discussions from daily chitchat to more serious discussions among Somalinet Forums members. Please do not use it as your Personal Message center (PM). If you want to contact a particular person or a group of people, please use the PM feature. If you want to contact the moderators, pls PM them. If you insist leaving a public message for the mods or other members, it will be deleted.
OUR SPONSOR: LOGIN TO HIDE
Colonel
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 6708
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 5:00 pm

Re: Which is worse?

Postby Colonel » Mon Dec 12, 2011 12:21 pm

Which is worse? They'll both end up in the fire so does it really matter?

In my opinion Seculars/liberals/"progressive muslims" are even worse since they want to change Allah's diin in order to please the West, indeed the hypocrites will have 1 of the worst punishment May Allah protect us from that.

Alphanumeric
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 14683
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:00 am

Re: Which is worse?

Postby Alphanumeric » Mon Dec 12, 2011 12:29 pm

shirk, (again, according to my old macalains :up:) is the act of fabricating anything that has to do with Allah. i.e, associating others, ascribing false characteristics. I would say denying His existance is a huge fabrication against him. Ergo, athiesm is a form of shirk.
You're wrong. A mushrik is a kaafir, but a kaafir isn't always a mushrik.
That is, unless you would argue that an atheist worships himself/science/rationality/philosophy etc.
committing shirk, doesn't necessarily mean ur a mushrik. Christians commit shirk, by saying Jesus is the son of God, but they are not mushrikiin.
:lol:

Christians are not Mushrikiin?

User avatar
Shirib
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 26911
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:50 am
Location: May God grant us victory.

Re: Which is worse?

Postby Shirib » Mon Dec 12, 2011 12:32 pm

:lol:

Christians are not Mushrikiin?
U can argue about the trinity, but that's a whole nother argument. Majority of Christians will say they believe in one god. In the Quran Jews and Christians are referred to as Ahlul Kitaab, not Mushrikiin.

User avatar
Nanees
Posts: 0
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 8:23 pm
Location: Chilling on Cardassian Beaches in a Burqini

Re: Which is worse?

Postby Nanees » Mon Dec 12, 2011 12:37 pm

shirib I said tht on slife once. That Christians weren't disbelievers but ahlul kitaab and I got so much 'dawah' in the 'luuq' from 'religious brothers' smh

but then again the same thing happened one day when I said I wouldn't do the nasty with my husband cuz I've had my virginity longer than he's been in my life so I owe it my loyalty :lol:

Alphanumeric
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 14683
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:00 am

Re: Which is worse?

Postby Alphanumeric » Mon Dec 12, 2011 12:42 pm

:lol:

Christians are not Mushrikiin?
U can argue about the trinity, but that's a whole nother argument. Majority of Christians will say they believe in one god. In the Quran Jews and Christians are referred to as Ahlul Kitaab, not Mushrikiin.
I believe you're mistaken. Shirk is an act, a mushrik is the one who performs it. They reject Islam, say they believe in One God, but pray to others or worse yet, those who they claim are His children. This is basic stuff bro.

User avatar
eyes-only
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 5652
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 2:30 pm
Location: ** Xamar-Caddey**

Re: Which is worse?

Postby eyes-only » Mon Dec 12, 2011 12:50 pm

As far as I know, atheism is shirk. It's like saying which is worse, getting murdered or getting killed by a drunk driver.

If the person was originally a Muslim and turned atheist, then they committed shirk which the biggest sin ever...and according to some the only unforgivable sin.

User avatar
Shirib
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 26911
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:50 am
Location: May God grant us victory.

Re: Which is worse?

Postby Shirib » Mon Dec 12, 2011 12:54 pm

Nanees,

That's not what i was getting act. Christians are disbelievers.

Alpha,

maybe my arabic is off. Mushrikiin, are polytheists/idolaters? or anyone who commits shirk. If the latter, what is the difference between a mushrik and a kaffir?

Alphanumeric
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 14683
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:00 am

Re: Which is worse?

Postby Alphanumeric » Mon Dec 12, 2011 1:04 pm

Nanees,

That's not what i was getting act. Christians are disbelievers.

Alpha,

maybe my arabic is off. Mushrikiin, are polytheists/idolaters? or anyone who commits shirk. If the latter, what is the difference between a mushrik and a kaffir?
Those are one and the same. Shirk is to associate partners with Allah, to claim He has children, parents, spouse, etc.
Kufr, is the rejection or hiding of the truth. Similar to the "kaafir" in reference to a farmer, who hides seeds for fruit under the soil. Kufaar (kaafir, pl) reject what Islam has come with. They may not always be mushrikeen, since they may not worship anything at all, unless it's argued they worship themselves/life/science/money &c.

You have to understand that the Mushrikeen of Makkah also claimed to believe in Allah, in one god. They claimed that their idols were only a means of achieving nearness to Allah, regardless if their idols were complete fabrications or references to ancestors. Some even worshiped jinn, trees, rocks, etc. I make no* distinction between them and the those from the people of Musa who worshiped the golden calf. Or those who claimed Isa was the son of Allah. But that's just me.


OUR SPONSOR: LOGIN TO HIDE

Hello, Has your question been answered on this page? We hope yes. If not, you can start a new thread and post your question(s). It is free to join. You can also search our over a million pages (just scroll up and use our site-wide search box) or browse the forums.

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “General - General Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], nnjrewzas112 and 13 guests