Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators




You ask us why we disagree with a man who has insulted our religion, our way of life, made us look like savages who worship a none-existing god, insulted our beloved Nabi(SCW)
I haven't ever read or watched any of Rushdie's work, but his success is truly a testament to the power of free speech in the west. He is right when he says that 'free speech is the bedrock freedom upon which all other freedoms depend'. For those of you who disagree, and there are many here, why??
Am I the only one who cant see the video?

He's half English so that may account for it.I have no opinion of Salman Rushdie. I would like to point out though that he is the first and only overweight Indian I've seen
I didn't ask you whether or not you agreed with him, but whether or not you agree that free speech is a right incontrovertible. Do you believe that Salman Rushdie should be killed for his words?You ask us why we disagree with a man who has insulted our religion, our way of life, made us look like savages who worship a none-existing god, insulted our beloved Nabi(SCW)
I haven't ever read or watched any of Rushdie's work, but his success is truly a testament to the power of free speech in the west. He is right when he says that 'free speech is the bedrock freedom upon which all other freedoms depend'. For those of you who disagree, and there are many here, why??
Laws that are passed to stop "offense" can and will be used to diminish other aspects of free speech. Let this Salman Rushdie continue writing odious materials, what difference should it make to a billion strong religion growing at a mighty rate? He doesn't like Islam, it's his right to say so even against a religion so big, and that's the beauty of free speech.I read his Satanic around 1993 , large volume , useless long and boring , by page 300 i got tired of his non sense. The only thing i got out of him was my introduction the Ali Dashti , a book that changed my philosophy.
I don't advocate the right to offend as a "free speech" yes free speech is good , but only good with the right to question and stimulate a man's thinking not just to offend. Just offending people and then claiming its your right is not much of a use to civilization.

union where is the free speech you speak of? Why am I not allowed to deny the holocaust or insult the queen of England? 'Free speech' is only defended when used to insult Islam and its Prophets.
So you're arguing that Rushdie, Rush, and Duke should all have their free speech rights repealed, or at least eroded? Who would determine what constitutes "hate speech", a government agency? What would be considered hateful and inciting? Would denying the Triune God worshiped by billions of Christians and contesting the validity of their religion be considered incitement? Surly Christians take great offense when Muslims do this. This is a can of worms I'd rather have not opened. Millions lost their life in defense of free speech, we cannot back down now in the face of a handful of rioters and crazy clerics.Well we can use the other side of that argument and claim laws for unlimited freedom of speech will be used to incite hate and divid and wage war, and it did happen and millions of people lost their life as result , and thats more important then giving Rushdi or Rush and David Duke the freedom to offend in the expenses of millions that might die as result, or give the neo-cons the pretext to engage in a perpetual war .

Return to “General - General Discussions”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 76 guests