Postby RIIGHAYE » Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:09 pm
[quote="Ducaale004"]MAD MAC Do you have a proof that he killed women and children? The only legitimate claim I would agree with you Is that the dervishes raided lackey tribes who were facilitating the means to be hunted down. It is extremely justifiable that they were punished because whoever helps your enemy is your enemy. The tremendous support of their belief system, picturing themselves (Dervish movement)and their land as under a constant threat from an external society whom they held with contempt, gave them enough reason to justify their actions religiously. The British outperformed him by having other nations come to their aid and treating the local clans with elitist approach, a method that requires some measure of responsiveness to popular support. The subordinates (lackey clans) , unaware of the conscious undertaking of Sayid Mohamed to integrate our Somali lands, ceded their land to the British except Warsangeli clan in return for financial security. However, these tactics were only a check on the expansion of British Empire.
On the other hand, America is using the same tactics in Iraq by assisting the Shiite, a proposed majority in Iraq, overcome the Sunni dominancy. In fact, the tensions involved in the sectarian division are actually hurting America strategically finish the job as planned. It may even lead to consequences such as immediate withdrawal or prolonged military engagement, anarchy, and many possible worse scenarios saxib. Infringement of people'™s rights to land and self-determination always ensures defeat and I bet you that no matter how long America plans to stay in Iraq or increase the size of its military presence, the outcome will always be the same unless you let them (the occupied Iraqis) decide their own future and country.[/quote]
Yes I have a proof he killed women and children. He killed 300 women and children one day in LaasQorey. How could you overlook that horrible incident in 1912?
[/quote]
