Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators

So in other words, the whole thing is a waste of timeIt's not criminal case it's just civil lawsuit. The defendant is only demanding compensation for damages that may have been caused by plaintiff. If the plaintiff is dead broke, then the court can't force the plaintiff to pay up. In the future if the plaintiff gets rich then it's another matter.

So in other words, the whole thing is a waste of timeIt's not criminal case it's just civil lawsuit. The defendant is only demanding compensation for damages that may have been caused by plaintiff. If the plaintiff is dead broke, then the court can't force the plaintiff to pay up. In the future if the plaintiff gets rich then it's another matter.

You are reading too much into it..... If only you had more info, would you reach better conclusion...Again if we could only escape from banalities of daily life..So in other words, the whole thing is a waste of timeIt's not criminal case it's just civil lawsuit. The defendant is only demanding compensation for damages that may have been caused by plaintiff. If the plaintiff is dead broke, then the court can't force the plaintiff to pay up. In the future if the plaintiff gets rich then it's another matter.
Nope, any assets he owns will be subject to seize. It will make him uncomfortable in the USA and other jurisdictions where the ruling may apply. Its symbolic but a great step. Now to bankrupt the other NSS colonel who owns a nice house in the East Coast and has portrayed himself as a "wadaad".

?
The defendant works for the President as an adviser (that's what the article claims at least, never heard of him before), the victim does not.The victim works for the President? He's not from the North?
Read it again, last line says Ahmed works as an advisor for the President. Defendant's last name is Magan.The defendant works for the President as an adviser (that's what the article claims at least, never heard of him before), the victim does not.The victim works for the President? He's not from the North?


You are reading too much into it..... If only you had more info, would you reach better conclusion...Again if we could only escape from banalities of daily life..
Nope, any assets he owns will be subject to seize. It will make him uncomfortable in the USA and other jurisdictions where the ruling may apply. Its symbolic but a great step. Now to bankrupt the other NSS colonel who owns a nice house in the East Coast and has portrayed himself as a "wadaad".


Return to “General - General Discussions”
Users browsing this forum: nnjrewzas112 and 82 guests