Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators


Nice try but I ain't falling for that shit, qabiil breeds qabyaalad, you can never have one without the other. There is no qabyaalad without qabiil.
So Murax,
Somalis don't even take care of themselves, yet Somalis say "I'm only going to worry about Somalia" yet... they cheer and support stuff like this for clannism



101% true. Anyone who expects to keep qabiil around while eliminating qabyaalad is naive.Nice try but I ain't falling for that shit, qabiil breeds qabyaalad, you can never have one without the other. There is no qabyaalad without qabiil.
People have supported the likes of Aideed, Yusuf and Barre out of clanism, why not Al shabab. Alshabab seem tame when compared to the warlords.Who supports Al-Shabaab out of clannism?
+ 1Nice try but I ain't falling for that shit, qabiil breeds qabyaalad, you can never have one without the other. There is no qabyaalad without qabiil.
101% true. Anyone who expects to keep qabiil around while eliminating qabyaalad is naive.Nice try but I ain't falling for that shit, qabiil breeds qabyaalad, you can never have one without the other. There is no qabyaalad without qabiil.

I get what Fah is trying to say, but as bad as the warlords were, Al-Shabaab's brand of international craziness is beyond the pale. Al-shabaab's is an ideological struggle, not a relatively simple battle for clan supremacy. They present a unique threat to our very heritage, our entire way of life. They'd have us speaking another language, wearing surwaal khamiis, and marrying Chechens and Uzbeks if they could. The petro-ideology's cultural imperialism is more insidious,more widespread, and more dangerous to our survival as a unique ethnic group than any threat we've faced since colonization.People have supported the likes of Aideed, Yusuf and Barre out of clanism, why not Al shabab. Alshabab seem tame when compared to the warlords.Who supports Al-Shabaab out of clannism?
Murax and Fah who support a well known war criminal should not talk about morality or what Somalis should do.
I know what your saying, but Somalia becoming much more religious to a certain direction has been going since the early 90s. Even before Alshabab came around Somalia was what some would term "wahabized". Alshabab is a manifestation of this ongoing process. Its native Somalis on the wheels not Alshabab.I get what Fah is trying to say, but as bad as the warlords were, Al-Shabaab's brand of international craziness is beyond the pale. Al-shabaab's is an ideological struggle, not a relatively simple battle for clan supremacy. They present a unique threat to our very heritage, our entire way of life. They'd have us speaking another language, wearing surwaal khamiis, and marrying Chechens and Uzbeks if they could. The petro-ideology's cultural imperialism is more insidious,more widespread, and more dangerous to our survival as a unique ethnic group than any threat we've faced since colonization.People have supported the likes of Aideed, Yusuf and Barre out of clanism, why not Al shabab. Alshabab seem tame when compared to the warlords.Who supports Al-Shabaab out of clannism?

Return to “General - General Discussions”
Users browsing this forum: nnjrewzas112 and 72 guests