Welcome to SomaliNet Forums, a friendly and gigantic Somali centric active community. Login to hide this block

You are currently viewing this page as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, ask questions, educate others, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many, many other features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join SomaliNet forums today! Please note that registered members with over 50 posts see no ads whatsoever! Are you new to SomaliNet? These forums with millions of posts are just one section of a much larger site. Just visit the front page and use the top links to explore deep into SomaliNet oasis, Somali singles, Somali business directory, Somali job bank and much more. Click here to login. If you need to reset your password, click here. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Al-Nusra Commander: "The Americans Stand On Our Side" (Fake Interview)

Daily chitchat.

Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators

Forum rules
This General Forum is for general discussions from daily chitchat to more serious discussions among Somalinet Forums members. Please do not use it as your Personal Message center (PM). If you want to contact a particular person or a group of people, please use the PM feature. If you want to contact the moderators, pls PM them. If you insist leaving a public message for the mods or other members, it will be deleted.
OUR SPONSOR: LOGIN TO HIDE
User avatar
FAH1223
webmaster
Posts: 33829
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:31 pm
Location: THE MOST POWERFUL CITY IN THE WORLD
Contact:

Al-Nusra Commander: "The Americans Stand On Our Side" (Fake Interview)

Postby FAH1223 » Mon Sep 26, 2016 10:23 am

This interview by Jürgen Todenhöfer was first published in German on September 26 2016 by the Kölner Stadtanzeiger, the major newspaper in the Cologne region. (The interview was copied and translated to English for educational and academic purposes.)

Interview with al-Nusra commander "The Americans Stand on Our Side"

By Jürgen Todenhöfer

It was the seventh trip by my son Frederic and me to the civil war country Syria. We were there for 13 days. Words can only barely describe the extend of damage and suffering on both sides.

We conducted the interview ten days ago with a commander of the al-Qaida branch "Jabhat al-Nusra". Abu al-Ezz reported quite openly about his financiers Saudi-Arabia, Qatar and Kuwait. We were able to exactly research the identity of the man and know practically everything about him.

Interview in the stone quarry in Aleppo

The interview was arranged by a rebel from Aleppo. I have had contacts to Syrian rebels for years. It was conducted outside of Aleppo in a quarry in direct sight- and shooting-distance of Jabhat al-Nusra and could only be reached safely by a member of al-Nusra.

His fighters were partially not masked, i.e. easily identifiable. Part of his statements were nearly verbally confirmed shortly thereafter by a mufti in Aleppo. Other assertions about the lack of interest of rebels towards a ceasefire and an international aid-convoy also bore out. Just like his predictions about planned military activities in several cities of Syria.

Image
Abu al-Ezz, commander, says about Jabhat al-Nusra (al-Qaeda):

"We are one part of al-Qaeda. Our principles are: Fighting vice, pureness and security. Our affairs and our way have changed. Israel, for example, is now supporting us, because Israel is at war with Syria and with Hizbullah.

America also changed its opinion about us. Originally "IS" and us were one group. But "IS" was used in the interests of big states like America, for political reasons, and was steered away from our principles. It became clear to us that most of their leaders work with secret security services. We, Jabhat al-Nusra, have our own way. In the past they with us, they were our supporters.

Our aim is the downfall of the dictatorial regime, the tyrannical regime, the regime of the apostate. Our aim is the conduct of conquests, like [the great Arab general] Khaled ibn al-Walid made them. First in the Arab world and then in Europe."

Part 2 - The Interview by Jürgen Todenhöfer with the rebel commander Abu al-Ezz

Jürgen Todenhöfer: How is the relation between you and the United States? Does the U.S. support the rebels?

Abu al-Ezz: Yes, the U.S. support the opposition, but not directly. They support the countries which support us. But we are not yet satisfied with this support. They should support us with highly developed weapons. We have won battles thanks to the "TOW" missiles. We reached a balance with the regime through these missiles. We received the tanks from Libya through Turkey. Also the "BMs" - multiple rocket launchers. The regime excels us only with their fighter jets, missiles and missile launchers. We captured a share of its missile launchers and a large share came from abroad. But it is through the American "TOW" that we have the situation in some regions under control.

To whom did the U.S. hand those missiles before they were brought to you? Were those missiles first given to the Free Syrian Army by the U.S. and from there to you?

No, the missiles were given directly to us. They were delivered to a certain group. When the "road" was closed and we were besieged we had officers here from Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Israel and the United States.

What did those officers do?

Experts! Experts for the use of satellites, missiles, reconnaissance work, thermal surveillance cameras ...

Were there also American experts?

Yes, experts from several countries.

Including Americans?

Yes. The Americans are on our side, but not as it should be. For example we were told: We must capture and conquer "Battalion 47". Saudi Arabia gave us 500 million Syrian pounds. For taking the "al-Muslimiya" infantry school years ago we received from Kuwait 1.5 million Kuwaiti dinar and from Saudi Arabia 5 million U.S. dollars.

From the governments or from private persons?

From the governments.

The fight is difficult, the regime is strong and it has support from Russia ...?

We will fight until the downfall of the regime. We will fight Russia and the West because the West does not stand on our side. The West only sends us mujahedin, it facilitates the way of those fighters. Why doesn't the West support us properly? We have many fighters from Germany, France, Great Britain, America, from all western countries.

You have many fighters from Europe in Aleppo with the "al-Nusra front"?

Many, many, many!

How many?

Many.

What do you think about the ceasefire?

We do not recognize the ceasefire. We will reposition our groups. We will undertake in the next, in a few days an overwhelming attack against the regime. We have rearranged all our armed forces in all provinces, in Homs, Aleppo, Idlib and Hama.

You do not want those 40 trucks with aid supplies to bring those into the eastern part of Aleppo?

We have demands. As longs as the regime is positioned along Castello road, in al-Malah and in the northern areas we will not let those trucks pass. The regime must retreat from all areas in order for us to let the trucks pass. If a truck come in despite that we will arrest the driver.

Why did a few of your groups pull back a kilometer or 500 meters from the Castello road?

The regime used highly developed weapons against us. We received a backlash. That is why we silently retreated, to recover and to attack the regime anew. But this attack must lead to the downfall of the regime.

So that was a trick, a military tactic?

Yes, it was a military tactic.

Was the aim of this tactic to receive food or the reallocation of fighters?

We did not agree to the ceasefire.

Does that hold only for the al-Nusra Front or for all other groups, the rest of your allies?

The applies to all our integrated groups, who are our allies.

Islamic Front, Islamic Army?

They are all with us. We are all the al-Nusra Front. A groups is created and calls itself "Islamic Army", or "Fateh al-Sham". Each group has its own name but their believe is homogeneous. The general name is al-Nusra Front. One person has, for example, 2,000 fighters. Then het creates from these a new group and calls it "Ahrar al-Sham". Brothers, who's believe, thoughts and aims are identical to those of al-Nusra Front.

Is that your own opinion or also the opinion of higher management levels?

That is the general opinion. But if someone comes to you and makes you a 'moderate fighter' and offers you to eat and to drink, will you accept that or not?

450,000 people were killed in this war. I have been to Aleppo and Homs. Many parts are destroyed. If the war continues the whole country will be destroyed. Millions will die. ... In Germany we once had the 'Thirty Years' War' ...

We are now only 5 years at war, that is comparatively short!

Would you accept someone from the Assad-regime within a transitional government?

We accept no one from the Assad-regime or from the Free Syrian Army, which is called moderate. Our aim is the downfall of the regime and the founding of an Islamic state according to the Islamic sharia.

The people of Aloush, who traveled to Geneva for negotiations, accepted a transitional government.

They are Syrian mercenaries. Aloush fights with the al-Nusra Front. The groups Turkey houses and from which the Free Syrian Army was created have earlier been with al-Nusra Front. These people are weak people, they received a lot of money, they sold themselves. They must follow the orders of their sponsors.

The "Islamic Army and the "ISlamic Front" negotiate in Geneva

Because their leaders were produced in the West. They are counseled and paid by western secret services and the secret services of the Gulf states to fulfill the aims of those countries.

We are here at the most forward observation point of the Sheik Said area. This are is under our control. Behind those houses and al-Majbal are regime soldiers. Our armed forces are 200 meters from here.

-End-

You can read the original German version of the interview at the Kölner Stadtanzeiger.

User avatar
gegiroor
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 6440
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:57 pm

Re: Al-Nusra Commander: "The Americans Stand On Our Side"

Postby gegiroor » Mon Sep 26, 2016 11:07 am

When people thrive on conspiracy theory, they'd run with every false story out there that fits in their narrative.

This is Joulani, the leader of Jaish Fath Al-Sham (Formerly Jabhat Al-Nusra) making it very clear that the US is on the side of Assad and his fellow Rawaafidh.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=H--8_m3ATxQ

FYI, the US government designated Al-Nusra Front as a terrorist organization and makes it clear to all of the other opposition groups to stay clear from associating with them. The failed CoH was designed to sideline Al-Nusra from other rebel groups. It backfired on the US when Ahrar-Al-Sham and other rebel groups refused to go along with the US orders.

But then when people religiously follow Russia Today and Sputnik News, you can expect them to believe any conspiracy out there. We're talking about people who take comfort at the death of hundreds of defenseless Sunni men, women, and children every day. :down:
Last edited by gegiroor on Mon Sep 26, 2016 11:24 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
FAH1223
webmaster
Posts: 33829
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:31 pm
Location: THE MOST POWERFUL CITY IN THE WORLD
Contact:

Re: Al-Nusra Commander: "The Americans Stand On Our Side"

Postby FAH1223 » Mon Sep 26, 2016 11:23 am

When people thrive on conspiracy theory, they'd run with every false story out there that fits in their narrative.

This is Joulani, the leader of Jaish Fath Al-Sham (Formerly Jabhat Al-Nusra) making it very clear that the US is on the side of Assad and his fellow Rawaafidh.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=H--8_m3ATxQ

FYI, the US government designated Al-Nusra Front as a terrorist organization and makes it clear to all of the other opposition groups to stay clear from associating with them. The failed CoH was designed to sideline Al-Nusra from other rebel groups. It backfired on the US when Ahrar-Al-Sham and other rebel groups refused the US orders.

But then when people religiously follow Russia Today and Sputnik News, you can expect them to believe any conspiracy out there. We're talking about people who take comfort at the death of hundreds of defenseless Sunni men, women, and children every day. :down:
This is from a German newspaper not RT or Sputnik.

This is a German journalist who went to rebel-held Aleppo. Interviewed a commander.

User avatar
LeJusticier
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 8149
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 5:36 pm
Location: base of sufism. Imam Le Justicier ...Xerta Dareenka

Re: Al-Nusra Commander: "The Americans Stand On Our Side"

Postby LeJusticier » Mon Sep 26, 2016 11:24 am

Fah,
Are you hearing today’s songs…..cease fire this and that? Every time the US head choppers backed jihadists are on the verge of defeat in Aleppo, we are bombarded with talk of peace and Assad killing children and babies. We never question why the US wants to prolong this war and the suffering. Surely they must know their rebel barbarians do not have the word "peace" in their vocabulary.

User avatar
FAH1223
webmaster
Posts: 33829
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:31 pm
Location: THE MOST POWERFUL CITY IN THE WORLD
Contact:

Re: Al-Nusra Commander: "The Americans Stand On Our Side"

Postby FAH1223 » Mon Sep 26, 2016 11:33 am

Fah,
Are you hearing today’s songs…..cease fire this and that? Every time the US head choppers backed jihadists are on the verge of defeat in Aleppo, we are bombarded with talk of peace and Assad killing children and babies. We never question why the US wants to prolong this war and the suffering. Surely they must know their rebel barbarians do not have the word "peace" in their vocabulary.
In the post Gregoor put and the interview I put, the Nusra front aka Jabhat Fateh Al Sham did NOT want UN aid convoys to come. They didn't want anything to do with the ceasefire as the rebels had to separate themselves from them.

The rebels obviously won't do it... it puts them at a tactical disadvantage.

Now you're seeing Russia and the SAA bombing East Aleppo like its Grozny.

Once the SAA and its allied militias start the ground offensive, the rebels will have to pull back.

Its amazing how the tide of this war changed in only 11 months.

User avatar
gegiroor
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 6440
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:57 pm

Re: Al-Nusra Commander: "The Americans Stand On Our Side"

Postby gegiroor » Mon Sep 26, 2016 11:42 am

When people thrive on conspiracy theory, they'd run with every false story out there that fits in their narrative.

This is Joulani, the leader of Jaish Fath Al-Sham (Formerly Jabhat Al-Nusra) making it very clear that the US is on the side of Assad and his fellow Rawaafidh.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=H--8_m3ATxQ

FYI, the US government designated Al-Nusra Front as a terrorist organization and makes it clear to all of the other opposition groups to stay clear from associating with them. The failed CoH was designed to sideline Al-Nusra from other rebel groups. It backfired on the US when Ahrar-Al-Sham and other rebel groups refused the US orders.

But then when people religiously follow Russia Today and Sputnik News, you can expect them to believe any conspiracy out there. We're talking about people who take comfort at the death of hundreds of defenseless Sunni men, women, and children every day. :down:
This is from a German newspaper not RT or Sputnik.

This is a German journalist who went to rebel-held Aleppo. Interviewed a commander.
What about Joulani making it clear that the US is on the Assad side and Americans were responsible for the bombing that killed Al-Nusra commanders earlier this month?

Do we know the motive behind the "German" newspaper?

And if the US supports Jabhat Al-Nusra, why can't they provide an effective anti-air defense systems? When Saudi Arabia tried to provide the weapons to Jaish Al-Islam and Ahrar Al-Sham, it is the US that clearly warned them not to provide any effective air defense systems to the Sunni resistance. So where does this claim that US is on the side of Al-Nusra come from?

Truth is the West, Russia, China, and despotic Arab regimes see Islamic groups as more of a threat than Assad. It doesn't mean I support or agree with Al-Nusra, but telling the truth doesn't hurt. If the West, US in particular, supports Al-Nusra, Russia and Assad air force wouldn't have a free hand bombing the civilian population indiscriminately without any repercussions.

Raganimo
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2184
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 11:14 am

Re: Al-Nusra Commander: "The Americans Stand On Our Side"

Postby Raganimo » Mon Sep 26, 2016 11:52 am

I've been following this conflict since day one. I can say for certain that this is bullshit.

Also, this idea that the US is anti Asad is just laughable. They're backing the rebels in public, but they have no interest in Sunnis coming to power and neither do their Saudi puppets. They can't back Assad because that would be a public image disaster, but they would definitely prefer him rather than the likes of JN and other Sunni factions who would pose a threat to US interests in the region.

From the perspective of the US, Assad was a stabilizing figure who did not pose a real threat. They even cooperated with him and Syria was part of the illegal rendition program and functioned as a "black site".

Same goes for Iran. Iran aided the US in both the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq and has benefited tremendously from the WoT. It also cooperates with the US in Iraq and the US-backed puppet regime in Iraq is closely allied with Iran.

Sxb you're being too simplistic and have bought into that bs narrative that Assad is "anti-imperialist" and that the Syrian people are being manipulated by US backed militias.

The piece of shit that you're backing is one of the worst criminals in recent history by all accounts. As we speak, him and his allies are bombing impoverished, destitute people and you want to sit here and propagandise on their behalf? This is real life sxb, not some silly game.

Raganimo
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2184
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 11:14 am

Re: Al-Nusra Commander: "The Americans Stand On Our Side"

Postby Raganimo » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:02 pm

Right now, the Americans and Russians both realise that the likelihood of Assad regaining full control of the country is slim to none. Instead, they want to maintain the status quo and let them both bleed each other out. The US is providing just enough backing to secular militants to keep them for being overrun, all the while encouraging them to stab the Islamist militias in the back (similar to what Isis did a few years ago when the Islamic militias were gaining momentum) and the Russians are providing cover for Assad.

There are many dimensions to this conflict. For instance, the Russians (who are under heavy sanctions by the EU as a result of their annexation of Crimea) want to keep the flood of refugees growing as they have seen how much it has caused political and economic instability in the EU. This conflict has also firmly put Russia back on the map as s serious player in global politics.

The Americans do not mind Russia getting even more mired into this conflict by even engaging land troops, since they know that the Russians do not have the resources to occupy Syria for a prolonged period of time. This is why Russian assistance to Assad has been restricted to air support for so long.

User avatar
gegiroor
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 6440
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 11:57 pm

Re: Al-Nusra Commander: "The Americans Stand On Our Side"

Postby gegiroor » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:04 pm

FYI, all of the US supported groups abandoned Aleppo and joined the Euphrates shield that is led by Turkish army. This withdrawal does tell the story - the US wants Al-Nusra, Jund Al-Aqsa, ISIS, and other Islamic groups sidelined or crushed in this current offensive spearheaded by Russian air force, while the groups it supports are safe with Turkish army in the so-called Euphrates shield. After this operation is over, they want a negotiated settlement between Assad and the groups supported by the US government.

That said, the claim that the US is supporting Jaish Fath Al-Sham is the joke of the century. Kerry made it very clear that they same up with the CoH because they don't want the people of Syria and other rebel groups see Al-Nusra as their liberators after this group broke the siege of Aleppo in August. The whole CoH was to get other rebel groups out of the way so only Al-Nusra, Jund Al-Aqsa, and other Islamic groups do the dying while the population is turned against them.

User avatar
FAH1223
webmaster
Posts: 33829
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:31 pm
Location: THE MOST POWERFUL CITY IN THE WORLD
Contact:

Re: Al-Nusra Commander: "The Americans Stand On Our Side"

Postby FAH1223 » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:07 pm

I've been following this conflict since day one. I can say for certain that this is bullshit.

Also, this idea that the US is anti Asad is just laughable. They're backing the rebels in public, but they have no interest in Sunnis coming to power and neither do their Saudi puppets. They can't back Assad because that would be a public image disaster, but they would definitely prefer him rather than the likes of JN and other Sunni factions who would pose a threat to US interests in the region.

From the perspective of the US, Assad was a stabilizing figure who did not pose a real threat. They even cooperated with him and Syria was part of the illegal rendition program and functioned as a "black site".

Same goes for Iran. Iran aided the US in both the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq and has benefited tremendously from the WoT. It also cooperates with the US in Iraq and the US-backed puppet regime in Iraq is closely allied with Iran.

Sxb you're being too simplistic and have bought into that bs narrative that Assad is "anti-imperialist" and that the Syrian people are being manipulated by US backed militias.

The piece of shit that you're backing is one of the worst criminals in recent history by all accounts. As we speak, him and his allies are bombing impoverished, destitute people and you want to sit here and propagandise on their behalf? This is real life sxb, not some silly game.
I'm not fan of Assad bro. But in a bastion of bad options, what's the best for keeping a state together? The total collapse of the government with the army splintering and general chaos? Or one side winning?

Also, why did the CIA train rebels in Jordan and re-supply them at the border there and at Turkey since 2010? Why did Ambassador Ford parade around the country encouraging all these protests until he was told to leave?

Do you really believe that covert regime change wasn't the order of the day?

Raganimo
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2184
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 11:14 am

Re: Al-Nusra Commander: "The Americans Stand On Our Side"

Postby Raganimo » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:32 pm

^The rebels aren't a monolith bro. Some are trained and equipped by the US. Others such as Isis are pretty much believed to be created by the CIA at this point. The rest are either indifferent to US involvement while others (the Islamic groups mostly JN and Ahraar) are vehemently against the US and the gulf Arabs.

What destabilised Syria was Assad's lack of ability and strategic thinking. Remember, this all started as simple protests and people asking for basic rights. Nobody wanted a civil war. The problem is that Assad thought that he could beat the protestors to submission just like his father did in the 80's. Only thing is, the idiot did not take the political changes in the region into consideration. Iraq was not a destabilised country back in the 80's. Assad's Syria was neighbor to a destabilised Iraq, where there was easy access to weapons and no shortage of militant groups. It was a disastrous miscalculation on his part.

In fact, if it wasn't for the formation of ISIS and Western and Russian involvement, Assad would have been toppled years ago. ISIS broke the back of the rebels at a crucial time and began to attack JN, Ahraar, FSA and other minor groups. In fact, up until recently, it did not even engage Assad but was busy attacking rebel stronghold such as Deir Azzoor. There were even many instances where the rebels were forced to simultaneously defend themselves against Assad and ISIS.

Raganimo
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2184
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 11:14 am

Re: Al-Nusra Commander: "The Americans Stand On Our Side"

Postby Raganimo » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:37 pm

As for regime change, then as I've already stated Syria did not pose a threat to the US. In fact, it cooperated with the CIA and was part of the illegal rendition program. Do you think that the Americans would be interested in destabilising a country as massive as Syria which neighbors Israel? Syria posed no threat to Israel or any of the gulf nations. Why change a regime that kept things stable? Why take the risk of Syria falling into the hands of Islamic militants who pose a direct threat to US interests?

It makes no sense.

User avatar
FAH1223
webmaster
Posts: 33829
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:31 pm
Location: THE MOST POWERFUL CITY IN THE WORLD
Contact:

Re: Al-Nusra Commander: "The Americans Stand On Our Side"

Postby FAH1223 » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:40 pm

^The rebels aren't a monolith bro. Some are trained and equipped by the US. Others such as Isis are pretty much believed to be created by the CIA at this point. The rest are either indifferent to US involvement while others (the Islamic groups mostly JN and Ahraar) are vehemently against the US and the gulf Arabs.

What destabilised Syria was Assad's lack of ability and strategic thinking. Remember, this all started as simple protests and people asking for basic rights. Nobody wanted a civil war. The problem is that Assad thought that he could beat the protestors to submission just like his father did in the 80's. Only thing is, the idiot did not take the political changes in the region into consideration. Iraq was not a destabilised country back in the 80's. Assad's Syria was neighbor to a destabilised Iraq, where there was easy access to weapons and no shortage of militant groups. It was a disastrous miscalculation on his part.

In fact, if it wasn't for the formation of ISIS and Western and Russian involvement, Assad would have been toppled years ago. ISIS broke the back of the rebels at a crucial time and began to attack JN, Ahraar, FSA and other minor groups. In fact, up until recently, it did not even engage Assad but was busy attacking rebel stronghold such as Deir Azzoor. There were even many instances where the rebels were forced to simultaneously defend themselves against Assad and ISIS.
What you say on Assad is all true, I agree 100%.

Thing with the rebels like FSA and their ilk, they're trained by the US. You have Syrian exiles who have lobbied the US and some NATO countries to the cause of the opposition.

But on the ground, Jabhat Al-Nusra and Ahrar Al-Sham have been the best fighting forces and a lot of the US-rebel factions have aligned with them naturally.

What about Nusra fighters being hospitalized by the Israelis? It's in the Jerusalem Post and other Israeli papers from 2014 and 2015.

User avatar
LeJusticier
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 8149
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 5:36 pm
Location: base of sufism. Imam Le Justicier ...Xerta Dareenka

Re: Al-Nusra Commander: "The Americans Stand On Our Side"

Postby LeJusticier » Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:55 pm

The headchoppers have two choices, surrender or die. There is no third choice.
I can clearly see that Russia has had enough of the duplicity of the USA and its allies and it seems the gloves are off. I pretty sure Russians and Syrian government would soon outclass and capture eastern Aleppo and get rid of the numerous factional headchoppers, the west and Gulf States have been shamefully supporting in Syria. 50% of these headchoppers in Syria are not even Syrian!

Raganimo
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 2184
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 11:14 am

Re: Al-Nusra Commander: "The Americans Stand On Our Side"

Postby Raganimo » Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:25 pm

The headchoppers have two choices, surrender or die. There is no third choice.
I can clearly see that Russia has had enough of the duplicity of the USA and its allies and it seems the gloves are off. I pretty sure Russians and Syrian government would soon outclass and capture eastern Aleppo and get rid of the numerous factional headchoppers, the west and Gulf States have been shamefully supporting in Syria. 50% of these headchoppers in Syria are not even Syrian!
How can you despise Siad Barre and support Bashar Al-Assad? :Puhlease:


OUR SPONSOR: LOGIN TO HIDE

Hello, Has your question been answered on this page? We hope yes. If not, you can start a new thread and post your question(s). It is free to join. You can also search our over a million pages (just scroll up and use our site-wide search box) or browse the forums.

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “General - General Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 94 guests