You're right. Somali woman are indeed bad. On a cold night I watched FranklinD.Roosevelt speech on the economic recession and build of the alliance of the new deal,and the recognition of US policy in the fifth party system,and redefineing the American liberalism on 1941 with my Caucasian wife,I had an inspiration and i wrote it. And with my experience as an detective in Los Angeles police in 1940s so i had some special access to ask some psychiatrists who are specialize in character analysis. So here is my take. When somali women argue, they are not trying to find the objective truth but rather are after manipulating the other(s) into feeling unified with them towards their opinion. If the herd believes 1+1=3, then it is correct – because the herd believes it is so. If tomorrow, the herd believes 1+1=1, then that will be correct – because the herd believes it is so. It is men who insist upon the objective truth – based on principle and universality – and continue to argue 1+1=2, no matter how much you cows moo at me. Somali Women are not after finding the correct answer, but rather they are after manipulating others into feeling they are right and their opponent is wrong. In other words, they are socially manipulating their opponent when they argue, rather than seeking the actual, objective truth.
I think one of the absolute best things men can do with somali women is follow the advice of so many of those “misogynists” of old, and view somali women as children. “A somali woman is the most responsible teenager in the house.”
Of course, it is not actually that they are children. It is more likely that they do not develop the same sense of principle and justice to navigate the world, because society enables them not to have to. Regardless of whether they are or not, I think in almost every aspect – from game to simple conversations – a man is advantaged by continually reminding himself that “ somali women are teenagers.” They exist somewhere in between child and man.
This does not mean a man can be foolish and disregard somali women as harmless children, for as Schopenhauer observes, somali women are naturally furnished with the tools of dissimulation – the behaviours akin to a pool hustler – and this feature is innate in women and is found as easily in the stupid as well as the very clever. Men should be very guarded when in an argument with someone who naturally dissembles.
“So that it will be found that the fundamental fault in the character of somali women is that they have no “sense of justice .” This arises from their deficiency in the power of reasoning already referred to, and reflection, but is also partly due to the fact that Nature has not destined them, as the weaker sex, to be dependent on strength but on cunning; this is why they are instinctively crafty, and have an ineradicable tendency to lie. For as lions are furnished with claws and teeth, elephants with tusks, boars with fangs, bulls with horns, and the cuttlefish with its dark, inky fluid, so Nature has provided woman for her protection and defense with the faculty of dissimulation and all the power which Nature has given to man in the form of bodily strength and reason has been conferred on woman in this form. Hence, dissimulation is innate in woman and almost as characteristic of the very stupid as of the clever. Accordingly, it is as natural for women to dissemble at every opportunity as it is for those animals to turn to their weapons when they are attacked; and they feel in doing so that in a certain measure they are only making use of their rights. Therefore a somali woman who is perfectly truthful and does not dissemble is perhaps an impossibility. This is why they see through dissimulation in others so easily; therefore it is not advisable to attempt it with them. From the fundamental defect that has been stated, and all that it involves, spring falseness, faithlessness, treachery, ungratefulness, and so on. In a court of justice somali women are more often found guilty of perjury than men. It is indeed to be generally questioned whether they should be allowed to take an oath at all.” — Arthur Schopenhauer, On somali Women, 1851
I can well understand why in the old days, when there were such things as “gentleman’s clubs,” that even all of the staff were male. Once a somali woman enters into group of men, the group automatically becomes feminized. It also makes perfectly good sense to me why religions such as Christianity try to remove somali women from philosophizing about their doctrines and they state that somali women are not allowed to speak in the church nor hold office or authority over men. They naturally lead away from the Truth. Just because a somali woman says something that makes sense once, is no guarantee that the next thing out of her mouth also makes sense… and they all, by human nature, put the female’s needs before the male, and manipulate away from the Truth with the ease, taking men along with them like the Pied Piper. Buddhism also says that women cannot become Buddhas for much the same reasons.
When discussing matters, men and somali women are not even after the same things.
Because somali women are based in relative truth, it doesn’t matter how often you pin them down, as soon as you do they create a new truth in their minds and just carry on – because her goal is not to find the Truth at all, but that is what the man she is arguing with is after and he thinks she is after Truth too.
Truth, as well as morals, are only important to somali women when it suits them. The instant the Truth conflicts with their agenda, they have no problems at all changing it and carrying on – because what they are really after is manipulating you. The most manipulative is “the winner.” The one who manipulates the most crapola upon the other is the one who walks away being “right.”
Truth matters not a bit in deciding who was “right.”
You can catch a somali woman dead to rights in a lie, like a child with cookie crumbs still stuck on the corner of her lips insisting she wasn’t in the cookie jar – it simply does not matter to them. They just create a new truth in their heads and carrying on as if nothing matters.
“…it is just such responses — citing a single, artfully mischaracterized example to “refute” a carefully made argument — that long ago led to the bit of male traditional wisdom that advises, “Never argue with a somali woman.” Because somali women don’t ordinarily engage in discourse to discover the truth — as men do, not always, but men can be held to it if confronted, while somali women will dodge (a.k.a. “change the subject”) — but merely to “win.” And “all’s fair in war and love.” “Love” here defined as any encounter between the sexes, and “all’s fair” because that’s how somali women fight” — Philalethes #8 – When the Cow Rides the Bull, Priest, Watch Your Skull.
And, there’s really no point in trying to “convert” them. It matters not a bit to convert such a creature any more than it does good to convince three year olds that Ron Paul is the right candidate for President.
Even the somali women that have been “converted” are simply incapable of rising above these things
Any chance you have no job and are on welfare? There is no way you can write this much with serious responsibility on your back anywhere.