CONISPIRACY THEORIES

[gobdoon]

Do you believe conispiracy theories like there has never been a man on the moon and that no airoplanes hit the twin towers on 9/11 because after the incident there were no remaining of the aircrafts and that an airoplain can't cause that amount of damage,some people say there was a misile what do you think.

[dhuusa_deer]

The problem with conspiracies they assume humans are competent punch able to keep secrets without someone droping the ball along the way. We KNOW that aint possible. To strengthen this arguement we know of NO conspiracy that has EVER shown to be true. So no, I don't believe conspiracy theories.

[Basra-]

Frankly all Conspiracists are a bunch of undiagnosed Bi-polar or Schizophrenics -- in my humble opinion.

[Nuruddin]

Conspiracy theories are another way of concealing the truth. Noone takes them lightly.

[Homer Simpso]

the conspiracy of man on the moon is valid.. I dont believe that they have been to the moon for two personal reasons.... it was in 1960's, humanbeing didnt have all the technology required for such a mission first of all, secondly, if they have been to the moon, why werent there any more attempts to reach the moon?......... other reason are: there is no air in the moon, how come that the american flag was wappering. when the aricraft landed, how come they didnt blow a hole in the ground because there was alotta dust!!!... it mounts up!!!...

about the world trade center... I do believe there was more than an airplane in those building.. I dont believe that an airplane can cause that damage. there can be a missle but has never been recorded. my theory is that they has something on bord which caused a massive explosion which again causes the downfall of the the towers.... but right on..

[Nabeela]

Homor


Stop watching these ridiculous DVD’s (9/11 conspiracy theory is it a myth or a fact?). I Think conspiracy theories are overrated, so i don't believe in them.

[dhuusa_deer]

[quote="Homer Simpso"] it was in 1960's, humanbeing didnt have all the technology required for such a mission first of all,[quote]

It wasn't in the 60s. The apallo program started in 1969 and ended in 1972 in which about 12 astranaunts walked on the moon.


[quote] if they have been to the moon, why werent there any more attempts to reach the moon?[quote]

12 men on the moon plus samples like rocks among others were enough. The moon is not a holiday spot ya know.


[quot]there is no air in the moon, how come that the american flag was wappering.[quote]

That's because you don't need AIR or BREEZE for something to wind/ripple... the simple act of waving or turning the flag pole sideways creates ripples.


[quote]when the aricraft landed, how come they didnt blow a hole in the ground because there was alotta dust!!!...[quote]

it did




[quote]I do believe there was more than an airplane in those building[quote]

You can believe whatever you like, evidence says there only innocent ppl in those buildings.



[quote] I dont believe that an airplane can cause that damage. [quote]

Why not?


[quote]there can be a missle but has never been recorded.[quote]


or aliens involved and never recorded... who cares?


[quote]my theory is that they has something on bord which caused a massive explosion which again causes the downfall of the the towers.... but right on..[/quote]

but you said a plane can't cause the collapse of the WTC, now you're saying explosives packed INSIDE the plane caused the collapse. Please help me understand how that works and tell me why that matters... the plane was piloted by islamic terrorists who flew into civilian building why should what in those planes matter at all?

[San_dheer]

I agree with Homer there are some things that just don’t add up. The whole thing was orchestrated by the Americans to seemingly out perform their cold war rivals the Russians.

Other conspiracies also sound plausible like the death on Princess Diana.

[gurey25]

You are all wrong.

Alien Penguins living in a base right next to Monut Erebus in the antarctic
where behind 9/11

[dhuusa_deer]

[quote="San_dheer"]I agree with Homer there are some things that just don’t add up. The whole thing was orchestrated by the Americans to seemingly out perform their cold war rivals the Russians. .[/quote]

but the mighty USSR didn't think it was fake at all. with all their survailance assets and expertise they didn't think it was fake.


DUMB africans and conspiracist, who are step away from genuine wackos, peddle these theories.


San-Dheer,

Nacas in aa tahay wakhti hore baa la'ogaay yeey balse maanta adhaa noo sheege ba.

[San_dheer]

I don’t argue with idiots like you.

Get lost moron.

[dhuusa_deer]

[quote="San_dheer"]I don’t argue with idiots like you.

Get lost moron.[/quote]

u don't or u can't. no arguement here, just tell us your reasoning along with some evidence. start with HOW the Russian were unaware of this hoacs but you a little refugee girl from the most god forsaken race on earth were able to figure it out. Please blow me away with your reasoning.

[San_dheer]

@ god forsaken race on earth

You need help.

[Kamal35]

[quote="Homer Simpso"]the conspiracy of man on the moon is valid.. I dont believe that they have been to the moon for two personal reasons.... it was in 1960's, humanbeing didnt have all the technology required for such a mission first of all, secondly, if they have been to the moon, why werent there any more attempts to reach the moon?......... other reason are: there is no air in the moon, how come that the american flag was wappering. when the aricraft landed, how come they didnt blow a hole in the ground because there was alotta dust!!!... it mounts up!!!...

about the world trade center... I do believe there was more than an airplane in those building.. I dont believe that an airplane can cause that damage. there can be a missle but has never been recorded. my theory is that they has something on bord which caused a massive explosion which again causes the downfall of the the towers.... but right on..[/quote]


Homer: If man didn't landed on the moon, the USSR would claimed it to the four heavens day in day out. That's something you can't hide or pretend for a long time. The fact that the USSR didn't say a word against it is the proof numer 1 that man, actually, landed on the moon. You can also go to your nearest observatory and ask the scientists there that explain to you how come they're receiving signals from the moon installed by the astronauts.


About the missile on the Pentagon (not the Twin Towers), well, there's a interesting book by Thierry Mayssan called 'The big lie'. It's interesting too read, but somekind weak in the theories.

[Basra-]

[quote="San_dheer"]
The whole thing was orchestrated by the Americans to seemingly out perform their cold war rivals the Russians.

quote]



San dher--thats a DUMB thinking. At least u should say --The Yuhuds Master minded the 9/11.The culprit of this --whoever it is-- is a genius.Which is why i find it hard that the arabs came with that idea since--u know--- they are dumb by nature.My thinking is--Egyptians are the only smart ones in the arab nation--so maybe they came up with that.The culprits who died in the airplane were some Egyptians too.