Page 2 of 2
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:17 am
by michael_ital
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:20 am
by Hambalayo2
You can call me Hambalayo, thanks.
My entire point was that you could have (and should have) responded in a PM. Since you have been here a while, I thought you would have been one to improve the quality of the forums, rather than further degrade them by posting new topics that were appropriate for the PM system only.
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:25 am
by michael_ital
I got your point. My point was, who are you to dictate what is, what isn't, appropriate for PM ?? I mean, seriously. "Improve the quality of the foum"? What am I missing here ?

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:28 am
by Hambalayo2
Oh dear, forget it. Obviously the point has missed your head. I guess what they said was true....
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:32 am
by michael_ital
What point was there to miss ?? Am I illiterate or something?? And it all depends on what "they" said.
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:39 am
by Hambalayo2
Oh, they said a lot. All 5 of them

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:44 am
by michael_ital
I'll bet. When the scamps get together, it's like an islaan sewing circle.

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 1:57 am
by Hambalayo2
Actually, I'd consider all of them to be among the top ten of this forum.
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 2:18 am
by Aiman
[quote="Hambalayo2"]You have a PM system, use it. If your topic is directed at one person, why not PM them instead of creating another topic?[/quote]
I think he is afraid of the qarxis or to be exposed that happned to him a few months ago; so he doesn't want to make the same mistake again.