MAD MAC,
Even if that WERE the plan, Bush had nothing to do with it, I can assure you.
Hindsight is 20/20. A strengthened Saddam would have been the best thing to curb the Shia threat. There's no way the current chaos was planned in Iraq. If they could turn back time, I'm thinking now the US would do anything to have Saddam back and would have even engaged him and played nice with him especially because of Ahmedinijad's current posturing.
Iraq under Saddam was 'Martha Stewart Living' compared this.
I can see if you say that might be the plan in Somalia, where there is absolutely no effect on much of anything globally.
I think the general formula is: "Order Where It Counts, Chaos In the 3rd World until terms are favorable"
Why would the US seek to tarnish its credibility, prestige, image, perceived military invincibility on a real sinister plan whose consequences cannot be predicted? I don't think the US would 'plan on chaos' when the stakes are this high.
The psychological effect of a swift & sudden victory in Iraq would have sent all the right messages to all the right people:
http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/axis600.gifIf the US had it their way, they would never play dice in the world's energy hub.
Besides, I think Machiavelli is very overrated. 'Ends justify the means', but that doesn't provide a permanent solution. In the long run, that policy is just a stopgap measure.
How many wars have been fought since Machiavelli and how many will be fought in the future?