Postby Intruder » Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:25 am
[quote="PragmaticGal"] Anyway, long as Somalinet is not a publicly owned site, I don't see any problem with graphic images of poor dead men being censored at the discretion of the site administrators.[/quote]
First of all this piece of turd called Wossy-Man does not represent the owner of S'NET, he is a low life scumbag who uses his moderating privileges to impose his own version of morality on the masses.
Secondly, it wouldnÂ’t be a problem if he applies some level of censorship as long he is being objective about it. He has zero objectivity and often sides with one camp vs. another and uses his moderating access unfairly. The Galol incident stands to be the lowest point this forum has reached and wossy-man was equally responsible for that debacle.
He should have two nicks, one dedicated for moderating (which should be no more than house cleaning duties) and another for posting his venom, but he canÂ’t mix the two.
On papers, this site might be privately owned, but since itÂ’s open for the public, then we, all posters are the true owners of it, without us, it will fold quickly, just like many Somali sites that have faded away most of them because they had numerous woosy-men, thankfully, SÂ’NET only have one.