Welcome to SomaliNet Forums, a friendly and gigantic Somali centric active community. Login to hide this block

You are currently viewing this page as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, ask questions, educate others, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many, many other features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join SomaliNet forums today! Please note that registered members with over 50 posts see no ads whatsoever! Are you new to SomaliNet? These forums with millions of posts are just one section of a much larger site. Just visit the front page and use the top links to explore deep into SomaliNet oasis, Somali singles, Somali business directory, Somali job bank and much more. Click here to login. If you need to reset your password, click here. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Muxumed Liibaan Jadeer and Raage Ugaas and Xamar

Dedicated for Somaliland politics and affairs.

Moderator: Moderators

OUR SPONSOR: LOGIN TO HIDE
User avatar
X.Playa
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 17317
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Canada,Hawd

Re: Muxumed Liibaan Jadeer and Raage Ugaas and Xamar

Postby X.Playa » Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:19 am

ah says the smooth thin handed Arsitocartic British fair maiden . what is there to refute my fair lady?

The`Republic
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 4133
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: Muxumed Liibaan Jadeer and Raage Ugaas and Xamar

Postby The`Republic » Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:36 am

Voltage what do you seek to achieve by refuting this drink-sodden pseudo-historian and his herd of illiterate buffoons.
Is it perhaps for them to fully read the book and to contextualize its contents before rewriting history.!
It would be selfish of me not to share the wealth of information researched on the history of the Somali people. It is also intellectualism on my side---to remind one of the jurisprudence of academic research and the interpretetion of it as well as the appropriate commentation of it.

Juxtoposing a correlation from thin air simply on the premise of a book's title just does not do. Well unless you are functionally illiterate.

Aristocat
SomaliNetizen
SomaliNetizen
Posts: 294
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 6:49 pm

Re: Muxumed Liibaan Jadeer and Raage Ugaas and Xamar

Postby Aristocat » Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:42 am

ah says the smooth thin handed Arsitocartic British fair maiden . what is there to refute my fair lady?
I have no time for conspicuous charlatan, who is soo transparently fraudulent. Your theology of historical liberation and cultural emancipation may be appealing to your herd of wildebeests but there is no veracity to your drunken fantasy. Copying and pasting random search from google is something worth refuting your flatheaded poseur
Last edited by Aristocat on Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
X.Playa
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 17317
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Canada,Hawd

Re: Muxumed Liibaan Jadeer and Raage Ugaas and Xamar

Postby X.Playa » Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:46 am

My fair lady you are too emotional for any debate and yet you nag me all the time , my fair lady has tow choices either to shut her both holes , or to engage and let out what has been bothering her for so long.

Aristocat
SomaliNetizen
SomaliNetizen
Posts: 294
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 6:49 pm

Re: Muxumed Liibaan Jadeer and Raage Ugaas and Xamar

Postby Aristocat » Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:58 am

Voltage what do you seek to achieve by refuting this drink-sodden pseudo-historian and his herd of illiterate buffoons.
Is it perhaps for them to fully read the book and to contextualize its contents before rewriting history.!
It would be selfish of me not to share the wealth of information researched on the history of the Somali people. It is also intellectualism on my side---to remind one of the jurisprudence of academic research and the interpretetion of it as well as the appropriate commentation of it.

Juxtoposing a correlation from thin air simply on the premise of a book's title just does not do. Well unless you are functionally illiterate.
I can appreciate that.
This reminds of a thread you were involved the other day on this section. Where one of the more intelligent members of the herd, copied and pasted a search from google on 'bon marexaan' in order to insult. He highlighted and circled a bon marexaan sentence and posted with utter satisfaction, honour and pride with realising that next sentence contradicted his thesis and completely made the opposite point. Lool.

Aristocat
SomaliNetizen
SomaliNetizen
Posts: 294
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 6:49 pm

Re: Muxumed Liibaan Jadeer and Raage Ugaas and Xamar

Postby Aristocat » Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:08 am

My fair lady you are too emotional for any debate and yet you nag me all the time , my fair lady has tow choices either to shut her both holes , or to engage and let out what has been bothering her for so long.
Buddy i have read almost every book you randomly quote from your google searches from the darwiish, to the topic on hand and i have read your threads. And trust me mate you are not worth debating, may you are worth educating but first you have to sober up and learn to read a complete book, rathering copying and pasting sentences from google

The`Republic
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 4133
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: Muxumed Liibaan Jadeer and Raage Ugaas and Xamar

Postby The`Republic » Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:30 am

Lol Aristocrat you must be talking about where Siciid made my point about Bon Marehan being the posessed or slaves and servants which the same article he posted (because it contained the name "Bon Marehan") in the next sentence explained it was in fact the servants and slaves to the clan. That one is harmless--not an intellectual bone in his body. The majority of what he runs with are google snippet views. If you shout hard enough, you sully the well--that's his tactic. It's bankrupt for people like me and frankly the worst thing you can do to a man is not respect him even if you don't like him. I am apathetic about him.

As for Xplaya I actually like him even though everything he posts is to counter some supra-Darod mythical historical control. Xplaya shows signs of intellectualism and I admire and respect him in that scope. If you are going to be learned start with genuine intellectual curiosity and he certainly shows that.

User avatar
X.Playa
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 17317
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Canada,Hawd

Re: Muxumed Liibaan Jadeer and Raage Ugaas and Xamar

Postby X.Playa » Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:51 am

I can write an entire book on how the Kacaan and its Daarood "histroian" hijacked somali history and turne it into Daarood barvado , from Shire Jaamac of 1960's to Abdi Sheikh Abdi" Divine madness in 1993 , thats some 33 years of Daaroodism and i can back up my claim , but can the Daarood refute? or rather whine about that facts? i'd say they will do the latter

Aristocat
SomaliNetizen
SomaliNetizen
Posts: 294
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 6:49 pm

Re: Muxumed Liibaan Jadeer and Raage Ugaas and Xamar

Postby Aristocat » Mon Dec 17, 2012 1:56 am

Lol Aristocrat you must be talking about where Siciid made my point about Bon Marehan being the posessed or slaves and servants which the same article he posted (because it contained the name "Bon Marehan") in the next sentence explained it was in fact the servants and slaves to the clan. That one is harmless--not an intellectual bone in his body. The majority of what he runs with are google snippet views. If you shout hard enough, you sully the well--that's his tactic. It's bankrupt for people like me and frankly the worst thing you can do to a man is not respect him even if you don't like him. I am apathetic about him.

As for Xplaya I actually like him even though everything he posts is to counter some supra-Darod mythical historical control. Xplaya shows signs of intellectualism and I admire and respect him in that scope. If you are going to be learned start with genuine intellectual curiosity and he certainly shows that.
Voltage you are far too generous. Admittedly XKeyse appears to be mildly more intelligent than siciid. However, comparatively speaking a chimpanzee is also a more intelligent and more evolved mammal than a hedgehog but that does not make its noise more intellectual or any less tolerable. The reason why he seems more intellectual than siciid is because compared to him, he has a better command of the English. Thus, his ad hominem and polemics pass off as 'signs of intellectualism'. However, in reality he is intellectually as vacant and barren as his tribal colleagues. He too suffers from the inferiority complex and the problems of mental deficiencies that run undercurrent in their society. They are forever engaged in eternal battle to combat and to destroy the darod conspiracy that dispossessed their history. And in order to give the pass off to this delusional fallacies as verified history, they engage in perverse revisionist history. Disputing historical facts in a scholarly and intellectual way is not a problem and it should be encourage. Nevertheless, the problem arise when someone with a perverted version of history tries to molest and violate it with impotent fallacies. Where fair minded people seek knowledge to further their own intellectual curiosity, people like Xkeyse seek to garner a filter evidence to give support to their delusions and predisposed position. All other evidence are discarded even if they are overwhelming compelling.He is willing to forge, to misinterpret and to lie. Their purpose is to willingly mis-educate, to misled and to misinform in order to celebrate to their conspiracy.
Voltage, my friend these type of people are not worth of public platform and their dribbles should not be encouraged or entertained.
Last edited by Aristocat on Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:40 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
X.Playa
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 17317
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Canada,Hawd

Re: Muxumed Liibaan Jadeer and Raage Ugaas and Xamar

Postby X.Playa » Mon Dec 17, 2012 2:14 am

:steviej: Aristo, why are you avoiding a manly debate rather then this effeminate way of attacking a man in third person while talking to your cousin TR???? are you that of a coward that you need to fight in that manner, its like you are standing behind TR and cussing me from there, thats what it would have looked like in real life .

User avatar
Samatr
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 14765
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 4:56 am
Location: Somewhere only we know :P

Re: Muxumed Liibaan Jadeer and Raage Ugaas and Xamar

Postby Samatr » Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:12 pm

Lol Aristocrat you must be talking about where Siciid made my point about Bon Marehan being the posessed or slaves and servants which the same article he posted (because it contained the name "Bon Marehan") in the next sentence explained it was in fact the servants and slaves to the clan. That one is harmless--not an intellectual bone in his body. The majority of what he runs with are google snippet views. If you shout hard enough, you sully the well--that's his tactic. It's bankrupt for people like me and frankly the worst thing you can do to a man is not respect him even if you don't like him. I am apathetic about him.

As for Xplaya I actually like him even though everything he posts is to counter some supra-Darod mythical historical control. Xplaya shows signs of intellectualism and I admire and respect him in that scope. If you are going to be learned start with genuine intellectual curiosity and he certainly shows that.
Voltage you are far too generous. Admittedly XKeyse appears to be mildly more intelligent than siciid. However, comparatively speaking a chimpanzee is also a more intelligent and more evolved mammal than a hedgehog but that does not make its noise more intellectual or any less tolerable. The reason why he seems more intellectual than siciid is because compared to him, he has a better command of the English. Thus, his ad hominem and polemics pass off as 'signs of intellectualism'. However, in reality he is intellectually as vacant and barren as his tribal colleagues. He too suffers from the inferiority complex and the problems of mental deficiencies that run undercurrent in their society. They are forever engaged in eternal battle to combat and to destroy the darod conspiracy that dispossessed their history. And in order to give the pass off to this delusional fallacies as verified history, they engage in perverse revisionist history. Disputing historical facts in a scholarly and intellectual way is not a problem and it should be encourage. Nevertheless, the problem arise when someone with a perverted version of history tries to molest and violate it with impotent fallacies. Where fair minded people seek knowledge to further their own intellectual curiosity, people like Xkeyse seek to garner a filter evidence to give support to their delusions and predisposed position. All other evidence are discarded even if they are overwhelming compelling.He is willing to forge, to misinterpret and to lie. Their purpose is to willingly mis-educate, to misled and to misinform in order to celebrate to their conspiracy.
Voltage, my friend these type of people are not worth of public platform and their dribbles should not be encouraged or entertained.

The issue here is you can not force others to believe the lies your parents brought you up with, everybody that doesn't agree with you is automatically wrong and their history is considered revisionist by you; and you have the nerve to say other people suffer from an inferiority complex. :lol:


OUR SPONSOR: LOGIN TO HIDE

Hello, Has your question been answered on this page? We hope yes. If not, you can start a new thread and post your question(s). It is free to join. You can also search our over a million pages (just scroll up and use our site-wide search box) or browse the forums.

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Politics - Somaliland”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests