Moderator: Moderators

How is Somaliland done when it's not even in that equation.The goal is not just the hydroelectric potential that the dam offers but to alter the demographics of the lowlands (Somali region) through catchments and irrigation schemes that would make the land more suitable for agriculture and thus attract non Somali Ethiopians to this underpopulated region. You kill two birds with one stone. On one hand demographic change would disrupt separatist sentiments in the region and it would it challenge Somali claims to their own resources.
For Somalia it wouldn’t change much, maybe affect her agricultural potential in the long run but one thing is unquestionable and it’s the geopolitical leverage Ethiopia has when dealing with Somalia.
Btw, Somaliland is done!


You may choose to believe that, but that doesn't make it true. If wishes were horses, beggars would ride. The reality is that if Ethiopia chooses to dam the Jubba & Shabelle rivers with 22 dams and reservoirs, they WILL dry up or at least significantly reduce flow to South Central Somalia. That is a certainty.I'm sure the secessionists would love for our rivers to dry up, but that won't be the case.
Good working relationsthip? A simple proposition? Are you on crack, or are you an Ethiopian? Don't be an idiot. Ethiopia's government always acts in the interests of the Tigray-Amhara-Oromo alliance, against Somali interests. They don't care about Somalis and Somalia - and I don't blame them.The current admin in Ethiopia and the current admin in Somalia have a good working relationship and if any issues arise an amicable solution is definitely a simple proposition.
Yet more bullshit. Ethiopia has no regard for international law or agreements. It made no consultation with Somalia, it did not ask for its input, it did not share any technical details. There was no consultation by Ethiopia, no technical committee from Somalia, no consideration of the down stream communities.It just went ahead and built the dams. So stop lying you f-king Ethiopian agent. We see through your lies.It is also important to note that Ethiopia and Somalia are part of the African Convention on the Protection of Nature and Natural Resources. The convention requires the contracting States to coordinate the planning and development of water resources projects. Section V of the original convention from 1968 encourages setting up inter-states commissions to study and resolve problems arising from the joint use of these resources. With Ethiopia already on the cusp of military confrontation with Egypt regarding the Blue nile Dam, which is a much, much larger project they will definitely move cautiously regarding other moves that can cause damage to relationships for decades due to shared water resource disputes.
You are being intentionally misleading and saying stuff that's factually INCORRECT. We are talking about between 10 and 22 dams, that Ethiopia is building on the rivers that flow into Somalia. You are intentionally trivialising this issue, which any reasonable observer can tell is of huge security importance for South Somalia.This would in theory have a direct effect on the shabelle river but not the Jubba river. Because it is more than 3x the size of the shabelle river.
yes it does smooth the flood or drought cycle, but for Ethiopia, not Somalia. It takes months or in some cases years to fill the dam reservoirs. Which means that during those drought months, the water will be diverted from The Shabelle and Jubba into Ethiopia's reservoirs. Little water will actually go to downstream communities in South Central Somalia. So while Ethiopia uses the water first to generate electricity and then to irrigate is massive cash crop plantations, South Central Somalia will be left high and dry, inevitably leading to famines during periods of drought like the 2011 famine. It will become an arid dust bowl region.Also A dam on the Juba is actually a net good because it smoothens the flood/drought cycle, providing a steady flow of water across the seasons.
Again you are lying. Why would Ethiopia dam the water if it has no use for it? Why would it borrow BILLIONS of dollars to build countless dams, if it has no use for it? Do you take us for fools? Of course Ethiopia will use the water. That's why it's building miles upon miles of CANALS to take the water from the reservoirs to industrial scale sugar and other plantations. That's why it has made agreements with international investors where the water will be used to irrigate massive Ethiopian, Chinese, Arab and Israeli food plantations. That's why it has built power lines to Kenya to export electricity which it will generate from the Jubba and Shabelle rivers.Ethiopia cannot really use the water of the Juba because the area in which it flows is mountainous and not suitable for large agricultural development very much like the area near the Blue Nile dam.
Again another lie. Evaporation is a function of the volume of water in a reservoir, there will be immense evaporation loss, particularly on the Jubba river. What's worse is the nutrient rich soil and silt that comes with the rivers and naturally fertilizes South Central Somalia's agricultural will be gone forever. Food production yields in South Somalia will fall off a cliff.Once again The Juba has almost 3x as much water as the Shabelle, so impounding it behind a dam will not result in as much evaporative loss.

Somaliland is a stable failed state while Somalia is an unstable failed state. They’re both shit!How is Somaliland done when it's not even in that equation.The goal is not just the hydroelectric potential that the dam offers but to alter the demographics of the lowlands (Somali region) through catchments and irrigation schemes that would make the land more suitable for agriculture and thus attract non Somali Ethiopians to this underpopulated region. You kill two birds with one stone. On one hand demographic change would disrupt separatist sentiments in the region and it would it challenge Somali claims to their own resources.
For Somalia it wouldn’t change much, maybe affect her agricultural potential in the long run but one thing is unquestionable and it’s the geopolitical leverage Ethiopia has when dealing with Somalia.
Btw, Somaliland is done!
We don't depend on ethiopia for water while zoomalia does.
If you ask me zoomalia doesn't have defined borders so it will be eventually absorbed by ethiopia and kenya.
Stop being emotional you don't make sense a failed state is failed state.Somaliland is a stable failed state while Somalia is an unstable failed state. They’re both shit!How is Somaliland done when it's not even in that equation.The goal is not just the hydroelectric potential that the dam offers but to alter the demographics of the lowlands (Somali region) through catchments and irrigation schemes that would make the land more suitable for agriculture and thus attract non Somali Ethiopians to this underpopulated region. You kill two birds with one stone. On one hand demographic change would disrupt separatist sentiments in the region and it would it challenge Somali claims to their own resources.
For Somalia it wouldn’t change much, maybe affect her agricultural potential in the long run but one thing is unquestionable and it’s the geopolitical leverage Ethiopia has when dealing with Somalia.
Btw, Somaliland is done!
We don't depend on ethiopia for water while zoomalia does.
If you ask me zoomalia doesn't have defined borders so it will be eventually absorbed by ethiopia and kenya.


Return to “Politics - Somaliland”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests