Page 1 of 1

US senior analyst suggests Somalia to be balkanized under AU

Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 9:47 pm
by Tigray

Re: US senior analyst suggests Somalia to be balkanized unde

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:30 am
by abgaalKING
That is really what is in the store for the "Fake" state of ethiopia.

Re: US senior analyst suggests Somalia to be balkanized unde

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 6:17 am
by AhlulbaytSoldier
This is the only solution dee ,cuz skinnies know nothing else than war.
They should be ruled by bantus.
Their women married off to bantus.
Bantu blood mixed with somali blood.


U can hate on bantus, but atleast they have peace in their own countries.

Re: US senior analyst suggests Somalia to be balkanized unde

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 6:19 am
by Kukri
This is the only solution dee ,cuz skinnies know nothing else than war.
They should be ruled by bantus.
Their women married off to bantus.
Bantu blood mixed with somali blood.


U can hate on bantus, but atleast they have peace in their own countries.
Like the house-nigger had peace in the basement of the master's house.

Re: US senior analyst suggests Somalia to be balkanized unde

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 6:23 am
by AhlulbaytSoldier
This is the only solution dee ,cuz skinnies know nothing else than war.
They should be ruled by bantus.
Their women married off to bantus.
Bantu blood mixed with somali blood.


U can hate on bantus, but atleast they have peace in their own countries.
Like the house-nigger had peace in the basement of the master's house.


So you prefer warlords or madmullah allied to Alqaacida to rule somalia?
Another 10 years of continues war or 10 years of peace under merciful Bantu lords who teach us the art of governance lol.

Re: US senior analyst suggests Somalia to be balkanized unde

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 6:28 am
by metamorphosis
Who gave these motherfuckers the right to make a decision on how Somalia should be? Walle hadaan warlord ahaan lahaa maxaan gaalo layn lahaa nacalaa abahood ku yaal! :x

Re: US senior analyst suggests Somalia to be balkanized unde

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 6:29 am
by Kukri
This is the only solution dee ,cuz skinnies know nothing else than war.
They should be ruled by bantus.
Their women married off to bantus.
Bantu blood mixed with somali blood.


U can hate on bantus, but atleast they have peace in their own countries.
Like the house-nigger had peace in the basement of the master's house.


So you prefer warlords or madmullah allied to Alqaacida to rule somalia?
Another 10 years of continues war or 10 years of peace under merciful Bantu lords who teach us the art of governance lol.
Call me naive if you want but i don't believe for one minute that all the problems in South Somalia start at the door-step of Al-shabab. But if it is a choice between a bantu aan daahir ahayn iyo al-shabab...then brother count me on the side of al-shabab. Because i believe that SOMALIS can handle al-shabab without outside interference and i will never accept the notion that an OUTSIDER can free/liberate me from my own brother.

Re: US senior analyst suggests Somalia to be balkanized unde

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 9:35 am
by abdisamad3
and we tell him to shuf up his little pathetic suggestion where the sun don't shine,
and you hutuking, your becoming pathetic, hadaad dhimaneeysid xaarka waa la iska duwaa ee caadi iska dhig,
kukri rageedi, :up:

Re: US senior analyst suggests Somalia to be balkanized unde

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 9:59 am
by udun
This is how certain sections of the 'foreign' establishment is thinking. It is all about how their interests can be guaranteed without Somalis having a say in it. Trusteeship means handing over Somalia to another country and removing it as an independent state. The endless invasions, the dual-track approach, foreign oil congramelates lobbying and limitimg Somalia's coast to only 12 miles, recent Ethiopian and Kenyan military incursions in the name of defeating Al-Shabaab, and now removing Somalia as an independent state. The 'foreign' establishment seems to be adamant that they will not allow Somalis chart their destiny.

The question that should be asked them is if they don't want to strengthen and reform TFG, why do they want Al-Shabaab to be defeated? On one hand they want the TFG cease to exist, on the other hand, they want Al-Shabaab defeated. It is clear they don't want an independent Somali entity emerging in Southern Somalia. But we many need to ask what is driving these people to take these drastic actions. It is my view that it is all about the untapped natural resources in Somalia, particularly, the hydrocarbons found in Somalia's continental shelf.

Re: US senior analyst suggests Somalia to be balkanized unde

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 10:08 am
by Lamagoodle
We are already balkanised whether we like it or not.

Re: US senior analyst suggests Somalia to be balkanized unde

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 12:18 pm
by HippoTT
HUTUFOOL, the Bantus have waged the longest and most destructive wars in African history, from Uganda to Rwanda to Congo to Burundi to Angola, around 10 million Bantus were slaughtered by other Bantus, our civil-war comes nowhere near the sick conflicts in those countries. The difference between their civil-wars and ours, is that they were allowed by NATO to reconcile while every-time Somalis come together to the table, or whenever a single popular Somali movement is set to take-over the country the Western powers launches all of their arsenal and proxy-slave countries to thwart any progress made in the South by arming warlords, by economic assasination, by pushing regional countries to invade.
This is how certain sections of the 'foreign' establishment is thinking. It is all about how their interests can be guaranteed without Somalis having a say in it. Trusteeship means handing over Somalia to another country and removing it as an independent state. The endless invasions, the dual-track approach, foreign oil congramelates lobbying and limitimg Somalia's coast to only 12 miles, recent Ethiopian and Kenyan military incursions in the name of defeating Al-Shabaab, and now removing Somalia as an independent state. The 'foreign' establishment seems to be adamant that they will not allow Somalis chart their destiny.

The question that should be asked them is if they don't want to strengthen and reform TFG, why do they want Al-Shabaab to be defeated? On one hand they want the TFG cease to exist, on the other hand, they want Al-Shabaab defeated. It is clear they don't want an independent Somali entity emerging in Southern Somalia. But we many need to ask what is driving these people to take these drastic actions. It is my view that it is all about the untapped natural resources in Somalia, particularly, the hydrocarbons found in Somalia's continental shelf.
It won't surprise me if Somalia has the largest oil reserves in Africa, we alreayd have the largest Uranium reserves. They need al-shabaab and TFG to legitimize the presence of their proxy forces. The biggest upset Somalis could make to their plans is if Al-Shabaab threw away the black flag and donned the blue sky white star flag and joined the TFG with all their men, and apologised for their crimes. This would allow the government to tax the wealthy regions of Somalia, and not be dependent on donors and there would be no excuse for the presence of their proxy armies, at the same time shady foreign actors like Sheikh Hassan and others could be purged out and replaced by patriots. The Shabab similarly would have a longer life-span if they became Somalia's version of the muslim brotherhood of Egypt.

This would be the only scenario for a Somali victory over the Global empire, unless an alternative Somali group rose to the occasion and subdued both Al-Shabaab and the corrupt TFG.

Re: US senior analyst suggests Somalia to be balkanized unde

Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 1:11 pm
by LiquidHYDROGEN
HUTUFOOL, the Bantus have waged the longest and most destructive wars in African history, from Uganda to Rwanda to Congo to Burundi to Angola, around 10 million Bantus were slaughtered by other Bantus, our civil-war comes nowhere near the sick conflicts in those countries. The difference between their civil-wars and ours, is that they were allowed by NATO to reconcile while every-time Somalis come together to the table, or whenever a single popular Somali movement is set to take-over the country the Western powers launches all of their arsenal and proxy-slave countries to thwart any progress made in the South by arming warlords, by economic assasination, by pushing regional countries to invade.
This is how certain sections of the 'foreign' establishment is thinking. It is all about how their interests can be guaranteed without Somalis having a say in it. Trusteeship means handing over Somalia to another country and removing it as an independent state. The endless invasions, the dual-track approach, foreign oil congramelates lobbying and limitimg Somalia's coast to only 12 miles, recent Ethiopian and Kenyan military incursions in the name of defeating Al-Shabaab, and now removing Somalia as an independent state. The 'foreign' establishment seems to be adamant that they will not allow Somalis chart their destiny.

The question that should be asked them is if they don't want to strengthen and reform TFG, why do they want Al-Shabaab to be defeated? On one hand they want the TFG cease to exist, on the other hand, they want Al-Shabaab defeated. It is clear they don't want an independent Somali entity emerging in Southern Somalia. But we many need to ask what is driving these people to take these drastic actions. It is my view that it is all about the untapped natural resources in Somalia, particularly, the hydrocarbons found in Somalia's continental shelf.
It won't surprise me if Somalia has the largest oil reserves in Africa, we alreayd have the largest Uranium reserves. They need al-shabaab and TFG to legitimize the presence of their proxy forces. The biggest upset Somalis could make to their plans is if Al-Shabaab threw away the black flag and donned the blue sky white star flag and joined the TFG with all their men, and apologised for their crimes. This would allow the government to tax the wealthy regions of Somalia, and not be dependent on donors and there would be no excuse for the presence of their proxy armies, at the same time shady foreign actors like Sheikh Hassan and others could be purged out and replaced by patriots. The Shabab similarly would have a longer life-span if they became Somalia's version of the muslim brotherhood of Egypt.

This would be the only scenario for a Somali victory over the Global empire, unless an alternative Somali group rose to the occasion and subdued both Al-Shabaab and the corrupt TFG.
:up:


Everytime there appears to be a dominant somali force, a clear winner taking over somalia they always get attacked by foreign agents and then we're back to square one i.e. civil war with no clear winner.