Re: The sad reality of somalia
Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 12:36 pm
The city was not founded by Hawiye, the city already existed in the 9-10th century and the first Somalis to arrive there came during the 13th century when the Arab geographer described it as a capital of Hawiye country.
Nonetheless, Let's not deflect from what you wrote in the previous page.
You claimed that Biimaal were slaves and I proved to you that they were not, matter of fact they owned and sold slaves and from the 17th century when they defeated the Geledi sultanate until the arrival of the Italian colonialists, lower Shabelle was controlled by Biimaal sultanate.
Ajuuraan is Xamare Samaale and not Irir Samaale like the Hawiye. So how can the uncle of Hawiye be Hawiye? Matter of fact, the clans who rebelled against the Ajuuraan dynasty were Hawiye and Digil, the latter being more successful in establishing their own ruling dynasty known as the Geledi Sultanate.
Nonetheless, Let's not deflect from what you wrote in the previous page.
You claimed that Biimaal were slaves and I proved to you that they were not, matter of fact they owned and sold slaves and from the 17th century when they defeated the Geledi sultanate until the arrival of the Italian colonialists, lower Shabelle was controlled by Biimaal sultanate.
Ajuuraan is Xamare Samaale and not Irir Samaale like the Hawiye. So how can the uncle of Hawiye be Hawiye? Matter of fact, the clans who rebelled against the Ajuuraan dynasty were Hawiye and Digil, the latter being more successful in establishing their own ruling dynasty known as the Geledi Sultanate.