Moderator: Moderators
Waachis,
I just can't comprehend your logic. What makes Oromo the parent and Somali the child? Why can't Somali be the parent? Why can't they be siblings?
I believe you think Oromo is parent only because Oromo pose much larger population. Your logic is bigger population = parent.
Very laughable.
Have you seen the population of Brazil and that of Portugal? United States and England?
Think next time.

Next time come up with better things to discuss. I'm not even going to waste my time finding diary entries.''The next great branch of the Ethiopic race comprehends the Oromo, who occupy an immense tract in Eastern Africa, from Abyssinia as far as the inland Portuguese possessions in Mozambique, to the south of the equator. An interesting tribe of the Oromo are the Somalis, who have lately been brought to the knowledge of Europeans, a widely scattered nation, who lead a pastoral life on the uplands, and also nearer to the coast of the Indian Ocean from Cape Jerdaffur southward to a considerable distance.. They seem to be of a mild and peaceful disposition, while the other Oromo tribes are a warlike race.''
[A Cyclopedia of Missions: Containing a Comprehensive View of Missionary Operations Throughout the World, with Geographical Descriptions, and Accounts ... Moral, and Religious Condition of the People, 1803-1863, Harvey Newcomb]

One saho clan claims Dir descentThat's not a proof just a statement. People need to stop using Western bloggers and their diary entries as "proof" and "holy testimony".
The people who done their work are the anthropologists and I agree with them. Oromo are Cushitic like the Somalis and in siblings there is no such thing as 'off-shot'.
First educate yourself Waachis and stop making holding white travellers and their diary stories so highly.
Study the proper history.
No wonder everyone keeps giving you hard time.
And Oromo is as indigenous to the Horn as the rest of the Cushitic family thus ignore trolls.
As for the guntino dress---it's not that Somali. It was introduced to the Banadir regions in the late 1800s by Arab/Indian/Barawaani traders.
It eventually made its way to the rest of the region including the Borana.
Just because a Somali imported an iPhone before an Oromo----doesn't make the iPhone more Somali than Oromo.
The real Somali clothe was white cotton sheet which itself was made in India. India was long the largest cotton producers and that's how the British got there after the cotton.
After the industrial age, the cotton expanded and it made to places like the Somali coast.
Here are the Saho, also Cushitic, wearing similar clothes.
Saho and Somalis have no contacts so can't say they copied. Just another clothe making its way to other Cushitics. Oromo in Wollo and Afar wear similar too.
Basic knowledge. The first rule in knowledge is freeing your mind from being biased and presenting things 'we, my, our'.
Nagaati.
Khalid's Cousin SpeakingHow can we copy our sons and daughters? Makes no sense. Darods came to us, when they were weak numerically, the generous Oromos said ''welcome, our sons, feel free to graze your livestock on the oromo grasslands, what is ours, is yours...''Borana Oromos copying Somali culture and clothing.''The next great branch of the Ethiopic race comprehends the Oromo, who occupy an immense tract in Eastern Africa, from Abyssinia as far as the inland Portuguese possessions in Mozambique, to the south of the equator. An interesting tribe of the Oromo are the Somalis, who have lately been brought to the knowledge of Europeans, a widely scattered nation, who lead a pastoral life on the uplands, and also nearer to the coast of the Indian Ocean from Cape Jerdaffur southward to a considerable distance.. They seem to be of a mild and peaceful disposition, while the other Oromo tribes are a warlike race.''
[A Cyclopedia of Missions: Containing a Comprehensive View of Missionary Operations Throughout the World, with Geographical Descriptions, and Accounts ... Moral, and Religious Condition of the People, 1803-1863, Harvey Newcomb]
Who came from who again?
True, it's like me saying that the white aussies lived in Australia for 250 years so it is their land but no, this not their land their land is Britian, or Ireland or NetherlandsHaving been there for 100s of years doesn't make it right; they took it by force, massacred the indigenous, caused unimaginable traumas, etc. Above all, the Oromo never apologized for what they did. So, if the same happens to the Oromo, it would be fair.You sound like an Amhara-extremist-unionist.
They've been there for 100s of years, BEFORE ETHIOPIA EXISTED. If you wanna go with that logic, the somalis are newcomers to NFD, Ogaden (oromos occupied the ogaden about 500 years ago and after a smallpox epidemic almost wiped out the oromos there, the darood somalis took it).
Basically, your excuse is: "we committed massacres 'cause others did so, and it's right." The Oromo Butta wara of hunting humans isn't something to brag about, nor an excuse for grabbing more lands. At least the Somali expansion was for survival (grass and water). Do you apologize for the Oromo massacring indigenous people and illegally taking over their lands?If the Somali conquered more land than the Oromo, who are YOU to blame us for doing something you did more of?!
Al shabab is administering land that the Somali conquered loooong ago.... the Somali expansion was and is known to be more aggressive and far reaching than the Oromo... are most Somalis not proud of their large land? Be honest with yourself, if possible. Nomads need more land than farmers and move around more, constantly seeking new grass and water... this was what led to the Somali expansion in a sense....and the Oromo expansion was for land too and as a military ritual of the Gada system... every 8 years, the new Gada grade had to wage war against a neighbor or big game like lions, elephants, etc....this was known as the Butta wara
Waachis,
I know you are trolling because surely you're more intelligent than that. First of all you have not presented any evidence neither book, or any research work based on any historical facts.
All you managed to do is quote the diary entry of a Church preacher (clergyman) from New York. You running around as if he produced a holy script on the history of Oromo and Somalis. Sorry just a diary from his office in New York. The guy never even set foot in East Africa. Let alone find any other facts, prove today that Harvey Newcomb has been to east Africa.
There are no books or any historical research that claims Somalis are splitter group of Oromo. In fact the world knew Somalis longer and better than Oromo. The fact is until recently you were known as Galla and your name often mistaken with Orma people from Kenya.
What is the oldest record of "Oromo"? You have to prove that.
Just Oromo being larger doesn't make them parent. There is no evidence. The name Galla is even given to them by Somalis meaning the infidel (gaal).
How can the child name the parent?
If we look at the diary entry, we can see many things are wrong with it. He uses tribe, nations, Ethiopic and Abyssinia all in the same sentence. First of all Somali is not a tribe. It is an ethnic. Isaaq, Darod, Hawiye, Dir and Rahanwein are tribes.
There was no Somali state in 1840s thus there is no 'nations'.
Equally Oromo cannot be classified as 'Ethiopic'. Do the research on what "Ethiopic" means.
Finally not all Oromo were under Abyssinia.
When we take those things into consideration without further dissecting the diary entry, we can clearly see he is clueless:
Next time come up with better things to discuss. I'm not even going to waste my time finding diary entries.''The next great branch of the Ethiopic race comprehends the Oromo, who occupy an immense tract in Eastern Africa, from Abyssinia as far as the inland Portuguese possessions in Mozambique, to the south of the equator. An interesting tribe of the Oromo are the Somalis, who have lately been brought to the knowledge of Europeans, a widely scattered nation, who lead a pastoral life on the uplands, and also nearer to the coast of the Indian Ocean from Cape Jerdaffur southward to a considerable distance.. They seem to be of a mild and peaceful disposition, while the other Oromo tribes are a warlike race.''
[A Cyclopedia of Missions: Containing a Comprehensive View of Missionary Operations Throughout the World, with Geographical Descriptions, and Accounts ... Moral, and Religious Condition of the People, 1803-1863, Harvey Newcomb]
Bigger population isn't parenthood neither are diary entries especially when the author never seen the concerned region.
Oromo and Somalis are related but no body knows who fathered who and who is older as siblings. It is not something relevant in today's world.
Somalis are their own race and did well in their own rights for their size (spreading across the most land amongst any ethnic in Africa).
Basically, your excuse is: "we committed massacres 'cause others did so, and it's right." The Oromo Butta wara of hunting humans isn't something to brag about, nor an excuse for grabbing more lands. At least the Somali expansion was for survival (grass and water). Do you apologize for the Oromo massacring indigenous people and illegally taking over their lands?If the Somali conquered more land than the Oromo, who are YOU to blame us for doing something you did more of?!
Al shabab is administering land that the Somali conquered loooong ago.... the Somali expansion was and is known to be more aggressive and far reaching than the Oromo... are most Somalis not proud of their large land? Be honest with yourself, if possible. Nomads need more land than farmers and move around more, constantly seeking new grass and water... this was what led to the Somali expansion in a sense....and the Oromo expansion was for land too and as a military ritual of the Gada system... every 8 years, the new Gada grade had to wage war against a neighbor or big game like lions, elephants, etc....this was known as the Butta wara
No, it wasn't. The Oromo were war-like savages who took pleasure in Butta wara, aka hunting humans and making trophies out of them. Unlike Somalis who expelled people from the lands they conquered, the Oromo pillaged everything that come in their path and enslaved those they captured.the oromo expansion was mostly for survival too, just like every one elses.
According to a report by Bermudes, in the 16th century, Oromos during their wars were fierce and cruel, mutilated and enslaved the people in the regions they conquered.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oromo_people#Slavery
It's more humane than massacring people as the war-like and human hunting Oromo did.expelling people from land makes it better? it's still stealing/conquering lands.
like how somalis massacred oromo farmers and raped oromo girls during the ogaden war of 78, while your dumb retarded ass is still here discussing what happened 100s of years ago......It's more humane than massacring people as the war-like and human hunting Oromo did.expelling people from land makes it better? it's still stealing/conquering lands.
I'm partially amhara, related to the late Tafari Makonnen, though I've never been to Ethiopia.you sound more and more like the amhara extremists everytime you type something


Return to “Politics - General Discussions”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests