Welcome to SomaliNet Forums, a friendly and gigantic Somali centric active community. Login to hide this block

You are currently viewing this page as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, ask questions, educate others, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many, many other features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join SomaliNet forums today! Please note that registered members with over 50 posts see no ads whatsoever! Are you new to SomaliNet? These forums with millions of posts are just one section of a much larger site. Just visit the front page and use the top links to explore deep into SomaliNet oasis, Somali singles, Somali business directory, Somali job bank and much more. Click here to login. If you need to reset your password, click here. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Iran's involvement in Somali uranium and al shabab

Daily chitchat on Somali politics.

Moderator: Moderators

OUR SPONSOR: LOGIN TO HIDE
Canuck2
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2017 6:11 pm

Iran's involvement in Somali uranium and al shabab

Postby Canuck2 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:20 pm

This is in 2006

Iran’s Involvement in Somalia, with al Qaeda

BY BILL ROGGIO | November 14, 2006 | admin@longwarjournal.org | @billroggio
Iran seeks uranium in exchange for training, weapons. Somali Islamists fought with Hezbollah in Lebanon against Israel. Saif al-Adel is plotting against the West with the help of the IRGC.

saif-al-adel.jpg

Saif al-Adel

Further details emerge on the United Nations report on foreign involvement in Somalia. The UN report shatters the myth that Sunnis and Shiite terrorists and nations would not cooperate due to ideological differences in religion and an intense hatred between the sects. Reuters notes that Somali Islamists fought in Lebanon against the Israelis over the summer in exchange for training, weapons and the potential transfer of nuclear material to Iran. Syria also provided training to Somali Islamists. As we noted, Iran has supplied the Islamic Courts with anti-aircraft weapons as well as anti-tank missiles.

But the report said about 720 Somali Islamist fighters with combat experience — selected by Afghanistan-trained hardline Islamist commander Adan Hashi Farah “Ayro” — went to Lebanon to fight Israel along Hezbollah in mid-July. The fighters were paid $2,000 and as much as $30,000, to be given to their families, if they were killed, the report says.

At least 100 Somali fighters returned, along with five Hezbollah members, while an unknown number stayed in Lebanon for advanced military training, it states. “In exchange for the contribution of the Somali military force, Hezbollah arranged for additional support to be given … by the governments of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Syrian Arab Republic, which was subsequently provided,” it says.

That included shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles, grenade launchers, machine guns, ammunition, medicine, uniforms and other supplies. Additionally, Syria hosted about 200 Islamist fighters for training in guerrilla warfare, the report says.

The report also gives a hint that Iran, locked in a battle with the West over its nuclear ambitions, may have sought help in finding uranium in the hometown of Somali Islamist leader Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aweys. “At the time of the writing of the present report, there were two Iranians in Dusa Mareb engaged in matters linked to uranium in exchange for arms,” it says, but gives no more information.

Syria denied any involvement, while Iran denied sending weapons before July but did not respond to a letter querying it about involvement after that point.
Iranian support of Sunni terrorist groups is hardly a new development. The 9-11 Commission Report clearly lays out the case for cooperation between al Qaeda, Hezbollah and Iran [portions excerpted below]. As the report notes, “The relationship between al Qaeda and Iran demonstrated that Sunni-Shia divisions did not necessarily pose an insurmountable barrier to cooperation in terrorist operations.” Contacts between Iran, Hezbollah and al Qaeda were established in Sudan in the early 1990s. “Al Qaeda members received advice and training from Hezbollah,” accordin g the the 9-11 Commission report. Many of al Qaeda’s 9-11 hijackers transited through Iran. “After 9/11, Iran and Hezbollah wished to conceal any past evidence of cooperation with Sunni terrorists associated with al Qaeda.”

Iran currently shelters Said bin Laden, Osama’s son and successor; Saif al-Adel, al Qaeda’s senior strategist who is said to be third in command of al Qaeda, as well as about 100 senior and mid-level al Qaeda commanders (up to 500 al Qaeda total are said to have fled to Iran after Operation Enduring Freedom). The Telegraph reports “Iran is training the next al Qaeda leaders,” and al-Adel has “struck up a close personal relationship with several prominent [Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps] commanders.”

“For the past five years he has been living in a Revolutionary Guards guest house in Teheran together with Saad and Mohammed bin Laden, two of the al-Qa’eda leader’s sons,” reports the Telegraph. American intelligence sources confirm this report. Al-Adel ordered bombings against US assets in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia in 2003, using a telephone. Five Americans were killed in the attack. He has written numerous strategy documents from Iran, including a seven phase plan to conquer the world by 2020.

Iran has been supplying weapons and training to both Shia and Sunni terrorists alike. Iranian made shape projectile anti-tank mines have been used by Sunni insurgents and al Qaeda alike in Anbar province.

Iran in the 9-11 Commission Report:

Page 50-51

Bin Ladin seemed willing to include in the confederation terrorists from almost every corner of the Muslim world. His vision mirrored that of Sudan’s Islamist leader, Turabi, who convened a series of meetings under the label Popular Arab and Islamic Conference around the time of Bin Ladin’s arrival in that country. Delegations of violent Islamist extremists came from all the groups represented in Bin Ladin’s Islamic Army Shura. Representatives also came from organizations such as the Palestine Liberation Organization, Hamas, and Hezbollah.

Turabi sought to persuade Shiites and Sunnis to put aside their divisions and join against the common enemy. In late 1991 or 1992, discussions in Sudan between al Qaeda and Iranian operatives led to an informal agreement to cooperate in providing support-even if only training-for actions carried out primarily against Israel and the United States. Not long afterward, senior al Qaeda operatives and trainers traveled to Iran to receive training in explosives. In the fall of 1993, another such delegation went to the Bekaa Valley in Lebanon for further training in explosives as well as in intelligence and security. Bin Ladin reportedly showed particular interest in learning how to use truck bombs such as the one that had killed 241 U.S. Marines in Lebanon in 1983. The relationship between al Qaeda and Iran demonstrated that Sunni-Shia divisions did not necessarily pose an insurmountable barrier to cooperation in terrorist operations. As will be described in chapter 7, al Qaeda contacts with Iran continued in ensuing years.

Page 240

Assistance from Hezbollah and Iran to al Qaeda As we mentioned in chapter 2, while in Sudan, senior managers in al Qaeda maintained contacts with Iran and the Iranian-supported worldwide terrorist organization Hezbollah, which is based mainly in southern Lebanon and Beirut. Al Qaeda members received advice and training from Hezbollah. Intelligence indicates the persistence of contacts between Iranian security officials and senior al Qaeda figures after Bin Ladin’s return to Afghanistan. Khallad has said that Iran made a concerted effort to strengthen relations with al Qaeda after the October 2000 attack on the USS Cole, but was rebuffed because Bin Ladin did not want to alienate his supporters in Saudi Arabia. Khallad and other detainees have described the willingness of Iranian officials to facilitate the travel of al Qaeda members through Iran, on their way to and from Afghanistan.For example, Iranian border inspectors would be told not to place telltale stamps in the passports of these travelers. Such arrangements were particularly beneficial to Saudi members of al Qaeda.

Our knowledge of the international travels of the al Qaeda operatives selected for the 9/11 operation remains fragmentary. But we now have evidence suggesting that 8 to 10 of the 14 Saudi “muscle” operatives traveled into or out of Iran between October 2000 and February 2001.

In October 2000, a senior operative of Hezbollah visited Saudi Arabia to coordinate activities there. He also planned to assist individuals in Saudi Arabia in traveling to Iran during November. A top Hezbollah commander and Saudi Hezbollah contacts were involved.

Also in October 2000, two future muscle hijackers, Mohand al Shehri and Hamza al Ghamdi, flew from Iran to Kuwait. In November, Ahmed al Ghamdi apparently flew to Beirut, traveling-perhaps by coincidence-on the same flight as a senior Hezbollah operative. Also in November,Salem al Hazmi apparently flew from Saudi Arabia to Beirut. In mid-November, we believe, three of the future muscle hijackers,Wail al Shehri, Waleed al Shehri, and Ahmed al Nami, all of whom had obtained their U.S. visas in late October, traveled in a group from Saudi Arabia to Beirut and then onward to Iran. An associate of a senior Hezbollah operative was on the same flight that took the future hijackers to Iran. Hezbollah officials in Beirut and Iran were expecting the arrival of a group during the same time period. The travel of this group was important enough to merit the attention of senior figures in Hezbollah. Later in November, two future muscle hijackers,Satam al Suqami and Majed Moqed,flew into Iran from Bahrain. In February 2001, Khalid al Mihdhar may have taken a flight from Syria to Iran, and then traveled further within Iran to a point near the Afghan border. KSM and Binalshibh have confirmed that several of the 9/11 hijackers (at least eight, according to Binalshibh) transited Iran on their way to or from Afghanistan, taking advantage of the Iranian practice of not stamping Saudi passports. They deny any other reason for the hijackers’ travel to Iran. They also deny any relationship between the hijackers and Hezbollah.

In sum, there is strong evidence that Iran facilitated the transit of al Qaeda members into and out of Afghanistan before 9/11, and that some of these were future 9/11 hijackers. There also is circumstantial evidence that senior Hezbollah operatives were closely tracking the travel of some of these future muscle hijackers into Iran in November 2000. However,we cannot rule out the possibility of a remarkable coincidence -that is, that Hezbollah was actually focusing on some other group of individuals traveling from Saudi Arabia during this same time frame, rather than the future hijackers. We have found no evidence that Iran or Hezbollah was aware of the planning for what later became the 9/11 attack. At the time of their travel through Iran, the al Qaeda operatives themselves were probably not aware of the specific details of their future operation. After 9/11, Iran and Hezbollah wished to conceal any past evidence of cooperation with Sunni terrorists associated with al Qaeda. A senior Hezbollah official disclaimed any Hezbollah involvement in 9/11. We believe this topic requires further investigation by the U.S. government.
Bill Roggio is a Senior Fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and the Editor of FDD's Long War Journal.

Tags: Iran

Canuck2
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2017 6:11 pm

Re: Iran's involvement in Somali uranium and al shabab

Postby Canuck2 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:21 pm

Iranian embassy in Mogadishu and introducing the Shiite doctrine to IDP

Canuck2
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2017 6:11 pm

Re: Iran's involvement in Somali uranium and al shabab

Postby Canuck2 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:22 pm

Also in 2006
Iran 'tried to get uranium by arming Somalia'
By David Blair, Africa Correspondent12:01AM GMT 16 Nov 2006
Iran tried to obtain uranium from Somalia in return for supplying weapons to the anarchic country's Islamist movement, the United Nations said yesterday.
A report compiled for the Security Council found that Iran is one of seven countries breaking a UN arms embargo by providing weapons to the Islamic radicals who control most of southern Somalia, including the capital, Mogadishu.
This influx of weapons increases the chances of a new regional war in the Horn of Africa. It also underlines the close ties which Somalia's Islamists, who style themselves the Supreme Council of Islamic Courts, have forged with radical regimes across the Muslim world, notably Syria and Iran.
The report found that 720 Somali fighters were sent to Lebanon in the summer to aid Hizbollah during the war with Israel. In return, Hizbollah dispatched five advisers to Somalia to provide advanced military training.
The flow of weapons into Somalia has "dramatically increased in terms of numbers of arms, frequency of delivery and weapons' sophistication", reads the 86-page report.
Related Articles
Slaughter in Somalia's capital 11 May 2006
Somalia bows to Islamic militia 05 Sep 2006
Islam has tamed a lawless Somalia, but is it raising an African Taliban? 08 Oct 2006
11 states 'fuelling civil war in Somalia' 11 Nov 2006
Iran plotting to groom bin Laden's successor 14 Nov 2006
While most of the shipments consist of small arms, it adds: "Ominously, new and more sophisticated types of weapons are also coming into Somalia including portable surface-to-air missiles, multiple rocket launchers and second generation, infrared-guided anti-tank weapons."
Three illegal shipments from Teheran are detailed. On July 25, an aircraft carrying Iranian arms landed at Baledogle airport near Mogadishu. This consignment included 1,000 machineguns, 45 surface-to-air missiles, M-79 rocket launchers and land mines.
After its arrival, the UN says that Iran promised the Islamists further weapons, but only in return for uranium, presumably for use in Teheran's nuclear programme.
Two Iranians were sent to the Somali town of Dhusa Mareb to negotiate this deal. "At the time of the writing, there were two Iranians in Dhusa Mareb engaged in matters linked to uranium in exchange for arms," it said.
Somalia's recoverable uranium deposits, totalling about 6,600 tonnes, are among the smallest in Africa, but the country collapsed into anarchy 15 years ago when its central government was destroyed. The Islamists, who captured Mogadishu from a coalition of secular warlords in June, are now believed to control the area where uranium is present.
Teheran appears to have sought the right to exploit these deposits, which could be shipped to Iran through Mogadishu's large port.
Six other countries have aided the Islamists. Iran's main ally, Syria, trained 200 Somali fighters in guerrilla warfare. Libya provided £600,000 for training and salaries. Other support came from Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Djibouti.
But most of the weapons have come from Eritrea, which, though not a Muslim country, is locked in confrontation with Ethiopia over a disputed border. Eritrea hopes to place pressure on its larger neighbour by building Somalia's Islamists into a major regional power and ally. Accordingly, it has sent about 2,500 troops into Somalia.
All this breaches a UN embargo placed on Somalia. The report was compiled by four experts charged with monitoring breaches of this embargo. Their conclusion is that the flow of weapons favours the Islamists and has succeeded in turning them into the "most powerful force in Somalia".
Kofi Annan, the UN secretary-general, called the situation "difficult and volatile" and said: "We do not need to see it further complicated by neighbouring countries rushing in with troops or guns."
david.blair@telegraph.co.uk

Canuck2
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2017 6:11 pm

Re: Iran's involvement in Somali uranium and al shabab

Postby Canuck2 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:24 pm


Canuck2
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2017 6:11 pm

Re: Iran's involvement in Somali uranium and al shabab

Postby Canuck2 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:25 pm


Canuck2
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2017 6:11 pm

Re: Iran's involvement in Somali uranium and al shabab

Postby Canuck2 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:26 pm


User avatar
AwRastaale
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 7612
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 5:09 am

Re: Iran's involvement in Somali uranium and al shabab

Postby AwRastaale » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:26 pm

There's no such thing.

Too late for you to lick Saudi ballz.

Canuck2
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2017 6:11 pm

Re: Iran's involvement in Somali uranium and al shabab

Postby Canuck2 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:28 pm

In 2006
Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA)
Saturday, November 18, 2006

Iran-Somalia-Arms embargo

Ads By Google

Iran on Friday categorically rejected the "baseless" allegations contained in a report of the Monitoring Group on Somalia that Tehran, along with other some other states, has violated a UN resolution imposing an arms embargo on Somalia.
In a letter sent to the Chairman of the UN Security Council's Committee on Somalia Nassir Abdulaziz Al-Nasser, Iran's Permanent Representative to the UN Mohammad-Javad Zarif said the allegations in the report "are totally baseless and without any foundation, and do not meet the minimum standards of credibility."
UN Resolution 751 passed on April 24, 1992 enjoined all states to observe an arms embargo on Somalia.

The resolution also established the Security Council Sanctions Committee against violators of the arms embargo.

The government of the Islamic Republic of Iran categorically rejects all alleged violations in the report as "ridiculous fabrications," Zarif stressed in his letter.

He added that it was unfortunate that "strange fabrications that flout logic and facts on the ground" were made by the Monitoring Group.

"The baseless allegations raised against the Islamic Republic of Iran in the report along with some other allegations mentioned therein do not have the value to be considered even as journalistic fiction, let alone being placed in a report which carries the name of the United Nations," Zarif said.

In conclusion, he said it was Tehran's expectation that "the Sanctions Committee and the Monitoring Group will address the unacceptable inclusion of such wholly groundless accusations and remove them from the report."

Source: Islamic Republic News Agency, Nov 18, 2006

Canuck2
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2017 6:11 pm

Re: Iran's involvement in Somali uranium and al shabab

Postby Canuck2 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:28 pm


Canuck2
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2017 6:11 pm

Re: Iran's involvement in Somali uranium and al shabab

Postby Canuck2 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:30 pm

There's no such thing.

Too late for you to lick Saudi ballz.
Licking is for your type rawmeat eaters, now out of my mentions.

Canuck2
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2017 6:11 pm

Re: Iran's involvement in Somali uranium and al shabab

Postby Canuck2 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:32 pm

There's no such thing.

Too late for you to lick Saudi ballz.
Also seeing you in my threads, proves that I am on right track.

Canuck2
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2017 6:11 pm

Re: Iran's involvement in Somali uranium and al shabab

Postby Canuck2 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:35 pm

Also according to wikileaks Iran stole uranium from Congo (the government there does not have full control of the country)



Nairobi — Secret messages published by WikiLeaks show great concern on the part of US diplomats with alleged smuggling of uranium from poorly secured mines and nuclear facilities in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

In one leaked cable from September 2006, the US embassy in Dar es Salaam suggests that uranium from the DRC may be passing through Tanzania en route to Iran.

Such trafficking is "common knowledge to two Swiss shipping companies," this message states, citing "a senior Swiss diplomat" as the source of the allegation.

In addition to its worries about Iran's nuclear programme, the United States fears that raw uranium and processed nuclear material could make its way from Central and East Africa into the hands of terrorist networks.

A United Nations report in November revealed that a Rwandan gang operating in the eastern DRC tried unsuccessfully in 2008 to sell six containers of what was claimed to be uranium mined during the Belgian colonial era.

American concern was highlighted last week by the signing of an agreement with the DRC aimed at preventing trafficking of nuclear and radioactive materials. The DRC and Tanzania are both rich in uranium resources.

Congo was the source of the uranium used in the US nuclear weapons that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of World War II.

And a July 2007 message from the US embassy in Kinshasa notes that "all of Katanga Province could be said to be somewhat radioactive."

Tanzania, meanwhile, was reported by Reuters in May last year to have at least 54 million pounds (108 million kilos) of uranium oxide deposits.

Tanzania expects to begin mining this motherlode in the coming year, Reuters added, reporting that the French energy group Areva is interested in exploiting the country's uranium deposits.

Uranium is a valuable commodity. The July 2007 cable from the US Kinshasa embassy notes that the price for a pound of the mineral increased from $15 in 2004 to $135 in 2007.

(Uranium currently sells on spot markets for about $62 per pound.) The DRC also maintains a nuclear research centre known as CREN-K at which "external and internal security is poor, leaving the facility vulnerable to theft," a September 2006 cable warns.

Reporting on a tour of the Kinshasa centre by US embassy officials, this message notes there are "numerous holes" in a fence around the facility as well as "large gaps where the fence was missing altogether."

Farmers grow manioc in a field next to the centre's nuclear waste storage building, the cable adds, observing parenthetically that elevated levels of radiation had been detected in this manioc plot.

"It is relatively easy for someone to break into the nuclear reactor building or the nuclear waste storage building and steal rods or nuclear waste, with no greater tool than a lock cutter," the cable continues. "It would also be feasible to pay a CREN-K employee to steal nuclear material."

In fact, this cable reports, one of two nuclear fuel rods stolen from CREN-K in 1998 was later recovered from the Italian Mafia in Rome. Mafia members were allegedly trying to sell it to unidentified customers in the Middle East, the cable adds.

"The second fuel rod has never been found," the US message states.

Leaked US diplomatic communications from the DRC and Burundi also show that embassy officials closely scrutinised information related to uranium smuggling.

The Americans posted in East Africa responded at times with outright scepticism or were careful to point out that some claims could not be substantiated.

A secret cable from the US embassy in Bujumbura dated June 27, 2007 relates that two Congolese were claiming to have found a cache of uranium and chemical items on a former Belgian colonial property 107 miles (171km) west of Bukavu in the DRC.

The Congolese said they had approached the US embassy, the cable indicates, because "they did not want these items to fall into the wrong hands, specifically mentioning that they did not want Muslims to possess the items."

But the Americans suggested that the Congolese men's story should not be considered trustworthy.

"This case fits the profile of typical scams involving nuclear smuggling originating from the eastern DRC," the cable states, citing an assessment of it as "a non-credible case of nuclear smuggling."

Similarly, the July 2007 cable from the US embassy in Kinshasa was careful to assess contentions that Malta Forest, a Congolese mining company, is illegally mining and exporting uranium from the DRC.

"A body of circumstantial evidence exists" in support of the allegations, the cable notes, "but specific hard evidence does not."

Profitable quantities

Mines in the DRC operated by Malta Forest probably contain profitable quantities of uranium, the message says.

"It would be easy to export it within raw, semi-processed rock as copper, especially if an illegal export system in an unregulated environment already existed to do so," the cable continues.

"The fact that the Embassy has received several reports in the past two months from approximately six different sources that Malta Forest is trafficking uranium, lends support to the circumstantial case against them."

"On the other hand," the cable points out, "Malta Forest is an easy target; it is a large company that has been working in the Congo since 1915, and it has been involved in business deals with various Congolese Government officials. Statistics are also intentionally muddied and manipulated by DRC officials to push various economic and political agendas."



They tried to do the exact same thing to Somalia in 2006 when the ICU ruled South Somalia. But their plans were stopped by the US. Because the US with Ethiopia destroyed ICU. Source:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... malia.html

Canuck2
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2017 6:11 pm

Re: Iran's involvement in Somali uranium and al shabab

Postby Canuck2 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:39 pm


Canuck2
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2017 6:11 pm

Re: Iran's involvement in Somali uranium and al shabab

Postby Canuck2 » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:40 pm


User avatar
AwRastaale
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 7612
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 5:09 am

Re: Iran's involvement in Somali uranium and al shabab

Postby AwRastaale » Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:48 pm

Flooding the forum is not going to bring out daddy Saudi so you can lick it good. They already made up their minds unlike flip-flopping Wanlawein who are one day Al qaeda, Hisbollah, ONLF, AMISOM, Qatar subjects, Turkish orphans, Saudi maids...

Why not have principles and stand for one thing?


OUR SPONSOR: LOGIN TO HIDE

Hello, Has your question been answered on this page? We hope yes. If not, you can start a new thread and post your question(s). It is free to join. You can also search our over a million pages (just scroll up and use our site-wide search box) or browse the forums.

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Politics - General Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: nnjrewzas112 and 10 guests