Moderator: Moderators

Ahh ... I am not a saho Bro. when and where did i say i was a saho???? so who is all over the place now?you all over the place, free yourself from habesha domination before you start picking fight with your big bros, that is if you even are Saho, I have never met a Saho who disrespect Somalis.So what? wu native to the shanghai region of china is a language spoken there, it is not the national language which is Mandarin. I am sure if you ask them would you rather be a somali with a state and national language they would decline and stick with what they have.
Somali is the state language of Somalia you silly boythere is no Beja, Afar, Saho states, and those languages are not the official languages of any state.
![]()

It's ridiculous and so elementary that they don't understand what homonyms are. They are even more prevalent in a ton language like SomaliXildiid the etymology of alot of words lead back to "gar" meaning beard, its a fundamental word in the somali language, nothing leads back to "gadh" even in the qaldaan accent, so I can only come to the conclusion that it is a corrupted version of "gar". Also its not unusual if you study the field of etymology or linguistics in general that you come across alot of words with multiple meanings, this is what makes a language rich and efficient, many ancient languages are the same, its bastardized languages that adopt new words into their vocab, nothing wrong with that I guess its a matter of opinion which is more functional, however you not making a case for purity by saying we use the same word with multiple meanings that is just going directly against your argument lmao I don't think you realise it bro.![]()

The only words that lead to the term “gar” are judicial words for instance “garnaqsi” (gar-naqsi).Xildiid the etymology of alot of words lead back to "gar" meaning beard, its a fundamental word in the somali language, nothing leads back to "gadh" even in the qaldaan accent, so I can only come to the conclusion that it is a corrupted version of "gar". Also its not unusual if you study the field of etymology or linguistics in general that you come across alot of words with multiple meanings, this is what makes a language rich and efficient, many ancient languages are the same, its bastardized languages that adopt new words into their vocab, nothing wrong with that I guess its a matter of opinion which is more functional, however you not making a case for purity by saying we use the same word with multiple meanings that is just going directly against your argument lmao I don't think you realise it bro.![]()

Carab (tongue) is not of proto Cushitic origin nor Proto Afro-Asiatic. The word itself is a deviation. The proto Afro-Asiatic root word for tongue is “lis”.It's ridiculous and so elementary that they don't understand what homonyms are. They are even more prevalent in a ton language like SomaliXildiid the etymology of alot of words lead back to "gar" meaning beard, its a fundamental word in the somali language, nothing leads back to "gadh" even in the qaldaan accent, so I can only come to the conclusion that it is a corrupted version of "gar". Also its not unusual if you study the field of etymology or linguistics in general that you come across alot of words with multiple meanings, this is what makes a language rich and efficient, many ancient languages are the same, its bastardized languages that adopt new words into their vocab, nothing wrong with that I guess its a matter of opinion which is more functional, however you not making a case for purity by saying we use the same word with multiple meanings that is just going directly against your argument lmao I don't think you realise it bro.![]()
Just look at
Ca-rab = an Arab
Car-ab = tongue
Ca-ro = anger
Car-o = soil
Ba-rre = teacher/guid
Bar-re = one with a mole
Na-cas = stupid boy
Nac-as = stupid girl
These guys with the almost childish caricuture to explain why THEY deviated make no sense.
ACTUALLY have you ever stppped and listened to people speak the Oromo language?
Wallahi if you listened for couple seconds you would realize who influenced the Waqooyi over utilization of "dh"

1. You know nothing about linguistics.Carab (tongue) is not of proto Cushitic origin nor Proto Afro-Asiatic. The word itself is a deviation. The proto Afro-Asiatic root word for tongue is “lis”.It's ridiculous and so elementary that they don't understand what homonyms are. They are even more prevalent in a ton language like SomaliXildiid the etymology of alot of words lead back to "gar" meaning beard, its a fundamental word in the somali language, nothing leads back to "gadh" even in the qaldaan accent, so I can only come to the conclusion that it is a corrupted version of "gar". Also its not unusual if you study the field of etymology or linguistics in general that you come across alot of words with multiple meanings, this is what makes a language rich and efficient, many ancient languages are the same, its bastardized languages that adopt new words into their vocab, nothing wrong with that I guess its a matter of opinion which is more functional, however you not making a case for purity by saying we use the same word with multiple meanings that is just going directly against your argument lmao I don't think you realise it bro.![]()
Just look at
Ca-rab = an Arab
Car-ab = tongue
Ca-ro = anger
Car-o = soil
Ba-rre = teacher/guid
Bar-re = one with a mole
Na-cas = stupid boy
Nac-as = stupid girl
These guys with the almost childish caricuture to explain why THEY deviated make no sense.
ACTUALLY have you ever stppped and listened to people speak the Oromo language?
Wallahi if you listened for couple seconds you would realize who influenced the Waqooyi over utilization of "dh"
It’s not a matter of homonyms but linguistic errors prevalent in certain dialects.
Dh is highly prevalent in Afar and Saho so what’s your point? I could make the argument that it’s a proto Cushitic feature given that Afar-Saho are closest to proto Cushitic after Beja.



Indians call it Roodhi and Gaadhi, though?For example; ROTI and GAARI are both very clear adoptions in Somali (from Hindi).
All Somali dialects except the triangle call it how it was borrowed; ROOTI and GAARI.
How the hell did it become ROODHI and GAADHI in the triangle.
That alone should answer the question you guys always pose. If you guys are so blatantly corrupting words that are not even Somali to suit your regional isolation within the larger Somali language continuum, why would you not have corrupted gar and gogol xaar.

Indians call it Roodhi and Gaadhi, though?For example; ROTI and GAARI are both very clear adoptions in Somali (from Hindi).
All Somali dialects except the triangle call it how it was borrowed; ROOTI and GAARI.
How the hell did it become ROODHI and GAADHI in the triangle.
That alone should answer the question you guys always pose. If you guys are so blatantly corrupting words that are not even Somali to suit your regional isolation within the larger Somali language continuum, why would you not have corrupted gar and gogol xaar.Not Rooti and Gaari.
https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the/h ... ce87f.html
https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the/h ... 76f56.html
Same with Badhasaab(Koonfur say Barasaab) which is another Indian loanword.

Im far from an expert on the Somali language but even i know that is garbage, lmao bro why are you doing this to yourself, walahi if you put effort into your dna study which I kind of agree you would be far more undisputed, this is just lazy research mate, Voltage is going to keep embarrassing you, not that I am supporting voltage but he has won this hands down.The only words that lead to the term “gar” are judicial words for instance “garnaqsi” (gar-naqsi).Xildiid the etymology of alot of words lead back to "gar" meaning beard, its a fundamental word in the somali language, nothing leads back to "gadh" even in the qaldaan accent, so I can only come to the conclusion that it is a corrupted version of "gar". Also its not unusual if you study the field of etymology or linguistics in general that you come across alot of words with multiple meanings, this is what makes a language rich and efficient, many ancient languages are the same, its bastardized languages that adopt new words into their vocab, nothing wrong with that I guess its a matter of opinion which is more functional, however you not making a case for purity by saying we use the same word with multiple meanings that is just going directly against your argument lmao I don't think you realise it bro.![]()
That’s it.

Return to “Politics - General Discussions”
Users browsing this forum: SadSayyid and 32 guests