USA, Ethiopia & Kenya want Somalia´s consitution remade!
Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators
Forum rules
This General Forum is for general discussions from daily chitchat to more serious discussions among Somalinet Forums members. Please do not use it as your Personal Message center (PM). If you want to contact a particular person or a group of people, please use the PM feature. If you want to contact the moderators, pls PM them. If you insist leaving a public message for the mods or other members, it will be deleted.
This General Forum is for general discussions from daily chitchat to more serious discussions among Somalinet Forums members. Please do not use it as your Personal Message center (PM). If you want to contact a particular person or a group of people, please use the PM feature. If you want to contact the moderators, pls PM them. If you insist leaving a public message for the mods or other members, it will be deleted.
- Coeus
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 11709
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:59 pm
- Location: Assisting the Mujahideen in Galgala to free their region
USA, Ethiopia & Kenya want Somalia´s consitution remade!
The debate over constitution-making in Somalia has moved to centre-stage and the international community is in the driver's seat.
But, its approach is simplistic, unfeasible and dangerous. The proposed draft constitution will not only fail to combat Somalia's conflicts, but will, rather, contribute to the Balkanisation of the country.
A simplistic approach
The international community's approach has been based on the groundless assumption that Somalia does not already have a constitution.
But Somalia does have a legitimate, balanced, democratic and Somali-owned constitution, which was drafted in 1960 and ratified through a referendum in 1961. Moreover, this constitution is not identified with any of the country's groups.
The international community, however, is reluctant to support the 1960 constitution for two reasons.
Firstly, some domestic actors have wrongly attributed the dictatorial practices of the military regime to the unitary nature of the Somali state. This fallacious logic asserts that the 1960 constitution was a unitary state system and that it is because of that system that the ruling elite abused its power. In order to avoid a potential repeat of this abuse, some Somalis have called for a federal system.
But this is a flawed diagnosis. There is nothing wrong with the unitary state system. In fact, most of the world's democracies have a unitary state system.
Some also add the criticism that a clan-based power-sharing formula is missing from the 1960 constitution.
Secondly, Somalia's neighbours believe that the 1960 constitution is irredentist in nature since it was created in the heydays of Somali nationalism. Article 6(4), which seeks the re-unification of Somalia through peaceful and legal means, is their main concern and the current draft constitution has omitted all irredentist articles and clauses.
Fortunately, both concerns can be easily addressed.
Regarding the first criticism, the 1960 constitution provides mechanisms that mandate decentralisation if the goal is to empower local communities. Moreover, any legitimate concerns that Somali groups have can - and must - be easily accommodated.
Regarding concerns about the irredentist elements of the 1960 constitution, I think Somalis must confront these issues head on through a public debate; simply omitting them from the draft constitution is not appropriate. If stakeholders debate these issues, as sensitive as they are, a pragmatic and win-win solution can be reached.
An unfeasible project
Security issues make it unfeasible to ratify the draft constitution at this time. Knowing this fact very well, Ahmedou Ould Abdallah, the former special envoy of the secretary-general of the United Nations, proposed an alternative way of ratifying the draft constitution. Comparing the constitution to the European Union charter, which was ratified by the legislatures of 27 countries, he recommended that Somalia's 550-member parliament sign off on it.
But this suggestion has its shortcomings.
Firstly, according to the Transitional Federal Charter of the Somali Republic (TFC), which through its 'immutable principles' calls for the ratification of the constitution through a referendum, this would be illegal.
Secondly, unlike in EU states, Somalia's parliamentarians are not elected and they cannot be a substitute for the will of the Somali people.
Finally, the international community is contradicting itself. It argues that the government cannot amend or change the content of the draft constitution. Yet, it wants the Transitional Federal Government (TFG) to ratify the draft constitution - a contradiction in terms.
Dangerous prescriptions
The draft constitution is dangerous as it prescribes unsustainable structures that could lead to the dismemberment of the country.
Some major issues are predetermined without opening them to public debate. For instance, a federation has been prescribed even though it is not appropriate in the Somali context.
Only 12 per cent, or 24 countries, of world states are federal states. Only three of these countries are African: Nigeria, Ethiopia and South Africa. Most of the 24 countries are large, geographically complicated and have diverse populations.
Somalia lacks the characteristics of federal states - it is small and its people are largely homogeneous. It is also poor and cannot afford to pay for one level of government, let alone multiple levels of government. The necessary human resources to serve three levels of government are lacking and there are no agreed upon regions that can federate.
Most importantly of all, the primary goal is to stabilise Somalia, but prescribing a federal system for Somalia will compromise stability by creating unnecessary competition and thus adding fuel to the fire.
If the current thinking of the international community is taken to its logical conclusion, many clan-based regions will be created, thus re-enforcing tribalism and sub-clan politics and undermining state-building efforts. Many communities, particularly unarmed clans and minority groups will experience discrimination if a federal system is adopted.
That said, some form of decentralisation is needed. But, I believe federation is unnecessary and it is context-inappropriate. Moreover, there are alternative ways of instituting decentralisation.
Wrong legislative institutions
The draft constitution also proposes symmetrical bicameral institutions - two houses that have the same powers to legislate. Such an arrangement, however, constitutes a duplication of services as just one house would be sufficient to do the job.
But, the more problematic aspect of this is that one chamber will represent undefined regional states and members of that chamber will be selected by legislatures of those unknown regions. Such a structure does not make sense and would be impossible to implement.
A bicameral system is possible, but may not be desirable.
As in some other African states, the second chamber could represent clans. Ghana and Botswana, two of the most stable countries in Africa, have an institutionalised tribal system and have created a House of Chiefs.
But a closer and more familiar example is Somaliland, which also has a bicameral system where one chamber represents the people and the second represents clans. Somaliland's Guurti or clan elders played a significant role in pacifying the region and since its bicameral system has been successful, there is a case to be made for Somalia replicating this.
A win-win solution
The president, the new cabinet and the parliament of the TFG must take the lead and propose reverting to the 1960 constitution.
With this, it must address the major concerns voiced by both domestic and external actors, and through this process, the Somali people may be able to reclaim their lost agency.
If the TFG is serious, it can present a comprehensive strategy that addresses decentralisation, a clan-based power-sharing formula and issues related to the irredentist nature of the 1960 constitution in less than a month.
The sitting parliament can then make the necessary adjustments to the document and a permanent government may result from this exercise.
For the international community, besides the difficulty of justifying the millions of dollars spent on the draft constitution, the 1960 constitution offers all of the characteristics it favours: It is a democratic, legitimate and Somali-owned document.
There is no need to go through with a referendum at this time. Many Somalis, particularly political stakeholders, are familiar with the constitution since it has been used for nine years.
Therefore, there is no reason for the international community to triangulate or impose unworkable arrangements on the Somali people.
This is a win-win solution and the international community must support it.
But, its approach is simplistic, unfeasible and dangerous. The proposed draft constitution will not only fail to combat Somalia's conflicts, but will, rather, contribute to the Balkanisation of the country.
A simplistic approach
The international community's approach has been based on the groundless assumption that Somalia does not already have a constitution.
But Somalia does have a legitimate, balanced, democratic and Somali-owned constitution, which was drafted in 1960 and ratified through a referendum in 1961. Moreover, this constitution is not identified with any of the country's groups.
The international community, however, is reluctant to support the 1960 constitution for two reasons.
Firstly, some domestic actors have wrongly attributed the dictatorial practices of the military regime to the unitary nature of the Somali state. This fallacious logic asserts that the 1960 constitution was a unitary state system and that it is because of that system that the ruling elite abused its power. In order to avoid a potential repeat of this abuse, some Somalis have called for a federal system.
But this is a flawed diagnosis. There is nothing wrong with the unitary state system. In fact, most of the world's democracies have a unitary state system.
Some also add the criticism that a clan-based power-sharing formula is missing from the 1960 constitution.
Secondly, Somalia's neighbours believe that the 1960 constitution is irredentist in nature since it was created in the heydays of Somali nationalism. Article 6(4), which seeks the re-unification of Somalia through peaceful and legal means, is their main concern and the current draft constitution has omitted all irredentist articles and clauses.
Fortunately, both concerns can be easily addressed.
Regarding the first criticism, the 1960 constitution provides mechanisms that mandate decentralisation if the goal is to empower local communities. Moreover, any legitimate concerns that Somali groups have can - and must - be easily accommodated.
Regarding concerns about the irredentist elements of the 1960 constitution, I think Somalis must confront these issues head on through a public debate; simply omitting them from the draft constitution is not appropriate. If stakeholders debate these issues, as sensitive as they are, a pragmatic and win-win solution can be reached.
An unfeasible project
Security issues make it unfeasible to ratify the draft constitution at this time. Knowing this fact very well, Ahmedou Ould Abdallah, the former special envoy of the secretary-general of the United Nations, proposed an alternative way of ratifying the draft constitution. Comparing the constitution to the European Union charter, which was ratified by the legislatures of 27 countries, he recommended that Somalia's 550-member parliament sign off on it.
But this suggestion has its shortcomings.
Firstly, according to the Transitional Federal Charter of the Somali Republic (TFC), which through its 'immutable principles' calls for the ratification of the constitution through a referendum, this would be illegal.
Secondly, unlike in EU states, Somalia's parliamentarians are not elected and they cannot be a substitute for the will of the Somali people.
Finally, the international community is contradicting itself. It argues that the government cannot amend or change the content of the draft constitution. Yet, it wants the Transitional Federal Government (TFG) to ratify the draft constitution - a contradiction in terms.
Dangerous prescriptions
The draft constitution is dangerous as it prescribes unsustainable structures that could lead to the dismemberment of the country.
Some major issues are predetermined without opening them to public debate. For instance, a federation has been prescribed even though it is not appropriate in the Somali context.
Only 12 per cent, or 24 countries, of world states are federal states. Only three of these countries are African: Nigeria, Ethiopia and South Africa. Most of the 24 countries are large, geographically complicated and have diverse populations.
Somalia lacks the characteristics of federal states - it is small and its people are largely homogeneous. It is also poor and cannot afford to pay for one level of government, let alone multiple levels of government. The necessary human resources to serve three levels of government are lacking and there are no agreed upon regions that can federate.
Most importantly of all, the primary goal is to stabilise Somalia, but prescribing a federal system for Somalia will compromise stability by creating unnecessary competition and thus adding fuel to the fire.
If the current thinking of the international community is taken to its logical conclusion, many clan-based regions will be created, thus re-enforcing tribalism and sub-clan politics and undermining state-building efforts. Many communities, particularly unarmed clans and minority groups will experience discrimination if a federal system is adopted.
That said, some form of decentralisation is needed. But, I believe federation is unnecessary and it is context-inappropriate. Moreover, there are alternative ways of instituting decentralisation.
Wrong legislative institutions
The draft constitution also proposes symmetrical bicameral institutions - two houses that have the same powers to legislate. Such an arrangement, however, constitutes a duplication of services as just one house would be sufficient to do the job.
But, the more problematic aspect of this is that one chamber will represent undefined regional states and members of that chamber will be selected by legislatures of those unknown regions. Such a structure does not make sense and would be impossible to implement.
A bicameral system is possible, but may not be desirable.
As in some other African states, the second chamber could represent clans. Ghana and Botswana, two of the most stable countries in Africa, have an institutionalised tribal system and have created a House of Chiefs.
But a closer and more familiar example is Somaliland, which also has a bicameral system where one chamber represents the people and the second represents clans. Somaliland's Guurti or clan elders played a significant role in pacifying the region and since its bicameral system has been successful, there is a case to be made for Somalia replicating this.
A win-win solution
The president, the new cabinet and the parliament of the TFG must take the lead and propose reverting to the 1960 constitution.
With this, it must address the major concerns voiced by both domestic and external actors, and through this process, the Somali people may be able to reclaim their lost agency.
If the TFG is serious, it can present a comprehensive strategy that addresses decentralisation, a clan-based power-sharing formula and issues related to the irredentist nature of the 1960 constitution in less than a month.
The sitting parliament can then make the necessary adjustments to the document and a permanent government may result from this exercise.
For the international community, besides the difficulty of justifying the millions of dollars spent on the draft constitution, the 1960 constitution offers all of the characteristics it favours: It is a democratic, legitimate and Somali-owned document.
There is no need to go through with a referendum at this time. Many Somalis, particularly political stakeholders, are familiar with the constitution since it has been used for nine years.
Therefore, there is no reason for the international community to triangulate or impose unworkable arrangements on the Somali people.
This is a win-win solution and the international community must support it.
-
Scarletmoon1
- SomaliNet Heavyweight

- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:14 pm
- Location: Boston
Re: USA, Ethiopia & Kenya want Somalia´s consitution remade!
It's sad that a sovereign country is being told to change it's constitution 
- Coeus
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 11709
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:59 pm
- Location: Assisting the Mujahideen in Galgala to free their region
Re: USA, Ethiopia & Kenya want Somalia´s consitution remade!
Walaal they want to change it, so Somalia can not claim NFD or ogaden in the near future. Right now in our present consitution we are legally pursuing that.Scarletmoon1 wrote:It's sad that a sovereign country is being told to change it's constitution
- kambuli
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 17268
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 3:20 pm
- Location: Proud Toothless Old Faqash Woman
Re: USA, Ethiopia & Kenya want Somalia´s consitution remade!
Mar haddaad dhulka is dhigto, Waa lagugu tumanayaa
Waxaa lagaa dhiganayaa musqul loosoo saxaro tego
,
- BlackVelvet
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 23249
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:54 pm
- Location: On Idman's mind
Re: USA, Ethiopia & Kenya want Somalia´s consitution remade!
Not a laughing matter lakin what a funny reactionkambuli wrote:Mar haddaad dhulka is dhigto, Waa lagugu tumanayaa![]()
Waxaa lagaa dhiganayaa musqul loosoo saxaro tego
![]()
,
- The_Emperior5
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 50031
- Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 4:45 pm
- Location: Suldaanka Guud beelaha reer Sheikh isxaaq Bani Axmed Bani Hashiim. In the republic of Soliziland
- Contact:
Re: USA, Ethiopia & Kenya want Somalia´s consitution remade!
AHAHAHAAHAHAA DALAL KALE BA IDIN SAMEYNAYA DASTUURKINA
DADKANI CEEB UMA DHINTAN KOONFURIANSKU
- sheekh-Farax-zero
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 7590
- Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 9:04 am
- Location: pppppppp
Re: USA, Ethiopia & Kenya want Somalia´s consitution remade!
The_Emperior5 wrote:AHAHAHAAHAHAA DALAL KALE BA IDIN SAMEYNAYA DASTUURKINA![]()
DADKANI CEEB UMA DHINTAN KOONFURIANSKU
Dadka consitution ka cusub loo sameenaya ka mid tahay,,waxaa rabto sheeg ..that is the fuct
- ciyaal_warta
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 9629
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:58 pm
- Location: Hiiraan State of Somalia
Re: USA, Ethiopia & Kenya want Somalia´s consitution remade!
lax walbo meeshee is dhigto baa lagu gowracaaa...bahdilaada maalin walbo waji cusub bey la imaaneysaakambuli wrote:Mar haddaad dhulka is dhigto, Waa lagugu tumanayaa![]()
Waxaa lagaa dhiganayaa musqul loosoo saxaro tego
![]()
,
- kambuli
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 17268
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 3:20 pm
- Location: Proud Toothless Old Faqash Woman
Re: USA, Ethiopia & Kenya want Somalia´s consitution remade!
Wallaahay ciyaar bay idiinka caddahay
Can you imagine how many kids/grown ups are kidnapped for organ transplants from our country? As there is no one watching out? We are busy on each other and the world is busy on us...Inaa Lilaahi, Wa Inaa Ileehi Raajicuun
Can you imagine how many of these ships are carrying toxic waste? How many are taking the illegal fishing?
Didn't you hear about the guy who was talking about the helicopter who flew low and shot the wild life and took it...Who can stop them? No one....Ilaahay uunbay Somaaliyi leedahay...
Can you imagine how many kids/grown ups are kidnapped for organ transplants from our country? As there is no one watching out? We are busy on each other and the world is busy on us...Inaa Lilaahi, Wa Inaa Ileehi Raajicuun
Didn't you hear about the guy who was talking about the helicopter who flew low and shot the wild life and took it...Who can stop them? No one....Ilaahay uunbay Somaaliyi leedahay...
- The_Emperior5
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 50031
- Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 4:45 pm
- Location: Suldaanka Guud beelaha reer Sheikh isxaaq Bani Axmed Bani Hashiim. In the republic of Soliziland
- Contact:
Re: USA, Ethiopia & Kenya want Somalia´s consitution remade!
sheekh-Farax-zero wrote:The_Emperior5 wrote:AHAHAHAAHAHAA DALAL KALE BA IDIN SAMEYNAYA DASTUURKINA![]()
DADKANI CEEB UMA DHINTAN KOONFURIANSKU
Dadka consitution ka cusub loo sameenaya ka mid tahay,,waxaa rabto sheeg ..that is the fuct
wakhtigooda uun bey iska lumiyeen anigu maba ka tirsani Somalia
-
grandpakhalif
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 30687
- Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 10:32 am
- Location: Darul Kufr
- Contact:
Re: USA, Ethiopia & Kenya want Somalia´s consitution remade!
jihadka aan si wadana against the kaafir states 
Re: USA, Ethiopia & Kenya want Somalia´s consitution remade!
The whole purpose of putting Somalia case in the so-called IGAD court is to ensure that these countries have dictations of any directions that Somalis take. We have been gradually subdued for these countries the same way that the Palestininas are subdued for YOU KNOW WHO 
- Cirwaaq
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 6472
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:37 pm
- Location: Event Horizon periphery... HIILumination
Re: USA, Ethiopia & Kenya want Somalia´s consitution remade!

How did we even let Kenya or Ethiopia with alteriror motives to setup a government for us?
In 1991 the world began a conservation program to safe the endangered somali species unfortunately after taking them to safe reservation across the world they are still classed endangeredEndangered means too stupid to adapt for the purpose of self preservation.
- Basra-
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 49034
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 7:00 pm
- Location: Somewhere far, far, far away from you forumers.
Re: USA, Ethiopia & Kenya want Somalia´s consitution remade!
costitution???seriously? Somalis have to be 'civilised' to have constitution first.

- SahanGalbeed
- SomaliNet Super

- Posts: 19032
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 5:48 pm
- Location: Arabsiyo ,Somaliland
Re: USA, Ethiopia & Kenya want Somalia´s consitution remade!
Inta jeer ay Faransiisku constitution-kiisa badalay miyaad ogtihiin ? Lix iyo toban jeer , 16 !!!!{ as of 1791}
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 2 Replies
- 640 Views
-
Last post by theyuusuf143
-
- 8 Replies
- 1231 Views
-
Last post by original dervish
-
- 5 Replies
- 1235 Views
-
Last post by kenyati
-
- 3 Replies
- 851 Views
-
Last post by Adali
-
- 1 Replies
- 17 Views
-
Last post by The_Patriot
-
- 50 Replies
- 3361 Views
-
Last post by Abdi_Som
-
- 12 Replies
- 1120 Views
-
Last post by MJ-Pride