Rebel & Gurey
Are you guys serious? How on earth can you come up with rubbish like "Muslims never attacked anyone"? And "Muhammed never attcaked anyone?
Who attacked who at badr? And what on earth where Muslims doing in uhud? Ejoying the views? have a picnic?
Muslims attacked to on on both occassions and the evidence for the latter is the agreement Muhammed made with the mercanaries which backfired so badly.(Protect our backs. If you see us being defaeted do not come to our aid..if you see us LOOTING you do not share the loot with us". sure the poorman was only defending himself! Defense my fat black arse. This was highway robbery at its most basic.
May I also draw our attention Rebel to khaybar. Who, exactly, said this " Once a Prophet puts his battle gear on he doesnt take it off till his sword tastes blood"? Perhaps Khaybar attacked him and his men?
And to say Muslims never attacked anyone is probably one of the most ludicrous things I ever read on these ludicrous pages. Did spain attack tariq's men? Did khosro attack at qassissiyah? perhaps the Jews and franks attacked Saladdin? Oh and India attacked the moguls! Did Egpyt attack Omar and his Arab army?
Sorry Rebel, changed my mind and decided to bite you on your (rather nice) butt. I can accept some rubbish from you because we share interests and hobbies but I cant let you get away with such blatant falsification of history.
Somali Islamists capture Jowhar
Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators
Forum rules
This General Forum is for general discussions from daily chitchat to more serious discussions among Somalinet Forums members. Please do not use it as your Personal Message center (PM). If you want to contact a particular person or a group of people, please use the PM feature. If you want to contact the moderators, pls PM them. If you insist leaving a public message for the mods or other members, it will be deleted.
This General Forum is for general discussions from daily chitchat to more serious discussions among Somalinet Forums members. Please do not use it as your Personal Message center (PM). If you want to contact a particular person or a group of people, please use the PM feature. If you want to contact the moderators, pls PM them. If you insist leaving a public message for the mods or other members, it will be deleted.
-
The rebel
- SomaliNet Heavyweight
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 8:46 pm
- Location: And you are asking... Why?
" Once a Prophet puts his battle gear on he doesnt take it off till his sword tastes blood"? Perhaps Khaybar attacked him and his men?
You added the last part which is "till his sword tastes blood" All my Arabic references did not add that part. Other thing this was in Uhud and not Khayber.
I still insist Prophet's time he or Muslims never started any attack. Read what leads those Wars? The wars did not end to start again. The war was going on between the two and those battle were just the meeting place. So I still read the history differently than you read it.
They defended the weaks and themselves. None Muslims were who were procking all the agreements and Muslims as rest of humankind they are allowed to defend themselves and stablish theit state and they successed.
You said looted? Well remember the wars from the bigging of the human history. The winner gets everything halalan malalan as we say it in our dialog. We call them ' الغنائم' or Ghanemah.
Oooh leave my butt out of this please
You added the last part which is "till his sword tastes blood" All my Arabic references did not add that part. Other thing this was in Uhud and not Khayber.
I still insist Prophet's time he or Muslims never started any attack. Read what leads those Wars? The wars did not end to start again. The war was going on between the two and those battle were just the meeting place. So I still read the history differently than you read it.
They defended the weaks and themselves. None Muslims were who were procking all the agreements and Muslims as rest of humankind they are allowed to defend themselves and stablish theit state and they successed.
You said looted? Well remember the wars from the bigging of the human history. The winner gets everything halalan malalan as we say it in our dialog. We call them ' الغنائم' or Ghanemah.
Oooh leave my butt out of this please
-
Sir-Luggoyo
- SomaliNet Super
- Posts: 7827
- Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 1:18 pm
- Location: Baar Luga Baxsi
Ditto
The ink I typed hasn't dried when the old man resorted to spraying his faeces
Oh, how much I know your lowly life Mr. Galol, how much.
I thought you bowed down when defeated like a gentleman but you are just a warthog eating his own sh!t.
Come up with something more beleivable if you want some attention.
The ink I typed hasn't dried when the old man resorted to spraying his faeces
Oh, how much I know your lowly life Mr. Galol, how much.I thought you bowed down when defeated like a gentleman but you are just a warthog eating his own sh!t.
Come up with something more beleivable if you want some attention.
Rebel
So now we are talking about excuses or who ATTACKED? I caught you on the attack didnt I? Muhammed attacked at Badr. Excuses is another matter. Muhammed attacked Uhud. Again excuses can be made for any attack anywhere.
I am not surprsied you avoided khaybar massacre when Mo attacked totally peaceful village that did him no harm whatsoever. And if he did not say "till it tastes blood" what exactly did he say? Perhaps he said " Oh I just enjoy looking in the mirror with this sword?
And wrong Mr. Nice Butt, it was khaybar.
Lugis
You talk about chit quite a lot. I wonder why?
So now we are talking about excuses or who ATTACKED? I caught you on the attack didnt I? Muhammed attacked at Badr. Excuses is another matter. Muhammed attacked Uhud. Again excuses can be made for any attack anywhere.
I am not surprsied you avoided khaybar massacre when Mo attacked totally peaceful village that did him no harm whatsoever. And if he did not say "till it tastes blood" what exactly did he say? Perhaps he said " Oh I just enjoy looking in the mirror with this sword?
And wrong Mr. Nice Butt, it was khaybar.
Lugis
You talk about chit quite a lot. I wonder why?
Rebel
So now we are talking about excuses or who ATTACKED? I caught you on the attack didnt I? Muhammed attacked at Badr. Excuses is another matter. Muhammed attacked Uhud. Again excuses can be made for any attack anywhere.
I am not surprsied you avoided khaybar massacre when Mo attacked totally peaceful village that did him no harm whatsoever. And if he did not say "till it tastes blood" what exactly did he say? Perhaps he said " Oh I just enjoy looking in the mirror with this sword?
And wrong Mr. Nice Butt, it was khaybar.
Lugis
You talk about chit quite a lot. I wonder why?
So now we are talking about excuses or who ATTACKED? I caught you on the attack didnt I? Muhammed attacked at Badr. Excuses is another matter. Muhammed attacked Uhud. Again excuses can be made for any attack anywhere.
I am not surprsied you avoided khaybar massacre when Mo attacked totally peaceful village that did him no harm whatsoever. And if he did not say "till it tastes blood" what exactly did he say? Perhaps he said " Oh I just enjoy looking in the mirror with this sword?
And wrong Mr. Nice Butt, it was khaybar.
Lugis
You talk about chit quite a lot. I wonder why?
[quote="The rebel"]" Oooh leave my butt out of this please [/quote]
This is disgusting and gross.I mean for a guy who claims to be a (heterosexual). He sure doesn’t show any natural feelings of disgust at the thought of another man constantly mentioning his (butt, lips, etc). (The rebel), at least humor us and pretend that you wana punch the lights out of him or something.
[/quote]This is disgusting and gross.I mean for a guy who claims to be a (heterosexual). He sure doesn’t show any natural feelings of disgust at the thought of another man constantly mentioning his (butt, lips, etc). (The rebel), at least humor us and pretend that you wana punch the lights out of him or something.
-
dhuusa_deer
- SomaliNet Super
- Posts: 8152
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:13 pm
- Location: Canada
Galol,
Stop embellishing history to your liking. Muslims never attacked anyone neither did their prophet Mr. PBUH. You know that to be true but won't admit... why must you be so stubborn, hellbent on vilifying the good muslims into ghouls? Something is amiss with you oldman, go see a therapist or something. Allow me to disabuse you of your woeful historical ignorance.
Prophet mohamed, may peace be upon him, never participated in any offensive wars despite leading many Ghazwas. He's compassion and clemency exemplary to say the least as most succintly attested to by the ethnic cleansing of the jews of Yathrib. According to the Hadiths the prophet, peace be upon him, entrusted the fate of the jews of Yathrib to Sa'ad, who was great admirer of the jews... when Sa'ad reached the verdict of excution for all males with pubic hair, sale of women and children into bondage and usurping of jewish property, the prophet Mohamed peace be upon him concurred with Sa'ad. His ultimatum letter to adjacent leaders wasn't adversarial but a RAPPROCHEMENT since those leaders were originally muslim (remember Adam was muslim and built the Kaba) and the prophet, PBUH, was dissuading them AND more importantly the ppl they were leading from path to hell. And finally his most famous sermon, the notorious LET THERE BE NO 2 DEENS IN THE PANINSULA given while on his deathbed, is horrendously misunderstood. For you see it was coded message it's true content perciptable only to select few of which you, I and most ppl aren't part of.
Gripped by WC football euphoria these days, let me use football to further accentuate what I'm trying to get through your thick, dense as depleted Plutonium head. You accuse muslims of invading neighbouring ppl unprovoked! That's a lie! Muslims being God's favourite ppl were given a novel method of warring. If 11 footie players serves a model, muslim territorial expansion -- which was among the top 2 or 3 by landmass in human history -- was achieved without entire 11 players leaving their OWN half or halfway line. Camped inside own half -- all their strikers, midfielders, defenders and goalie -- muslims were able to defeat their oponents 5-0 everytime... how they did it is a mystery but that is how things went down. Every battle muslims engaged in was purely out of self defense and all the land mass and ppl that fell under rule of muslims was the accidental outcome of defensive wars.
So don't try to falsify, whitewash history to score cheap points and further denigrade good muslims.
Nullius in Verba
Stop embellishing history to your liking. Muslims never attacked anyone neither did their prophet Mr. PBUH. You know that to be true but won't admit... why must you be so stubborn, hellbent on vilifying the good muslims into ghouls? Something is amiss with you oldman, go see a therapist or something. Allow me to disabuse you of your woeful historical ignorance.
Prophet mohamed, may peace be upon him, never participated in any offensive wars despite leading many Ghazwas. He's compassion and clemency exemplary to say the least as most succintly attested to by the ethnic cleansing of the jews of Yathrib. According to the Hadiths the prophet, peace be upon him, entrusted the fate of the jews of Yathrib to Sa'ad, who was great admirer of the jews... when Sa'ad reached the verdict of excution for all males with pubic hair, sale of women and children into bondage and usurping of jewish property, the prophet Mohamed peace be upon him concurred with Sa'ad. His ultimatum letter to adjacent leaders wasn't adversarial but a RAPPROCHEMENT since those leaders were originally muslim (remember Adam was muslim and built the Kaba) and the prophet, PBUH, was dissuading them AND more importantly the ppl they were leading from path to hell. And finally his most famous sermon, the notorious LET THERE BE NO 2 DEENS IN THE PANINSULA given while on his deathbed, is horrendously misunderstood. For you see it was coded message it's true content perciptable only to select few of which you, I and most ppl aren't part of.
Gripped by WC football euphoria these days, let me use football to further accentuate what I'm trying to get through your thick, dense as depleted Plutonium head. You accuse muslims of invading neighbouring ppl unprovoked! That's a lie! Muslims being God's favourite ppl were given a novel method of warring. If 11 footie players serves a model, muslim territorial expansion -- which was among the top 2 or 3 by landmass in human history -- was achieved without entire 11 players leaving their OWN half or halfway line. Camped inside own half -- all their strikers, midfielders, defenders and goalie -- muslims were able to defeat their oponents 5-0 everytime... how they did it is a mystery but that is how things went down. Every battle muslims engaged in was purely out of self defense and all the land mass and ppl that fell under rule of muslims was the accidental outcome of defensive wars.
So don't try to falsify, whitewash history to score cheap points and further denigrade good muslims.
Nullius in Verba
Last edited by dhuusa_deer on Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 2 Replies
- 507 Views
-
Last post by galia
-
- 1 Replies
- 3 Views
-
Last post by subeir123
-
- 8 Replies
- 948 Views
-
Last post by AhlulbaytSoldier
-
- 16 Replies
- 1540 Views
-
Last post by Somalian_Boqor
-
- 4 Replies
- 447 Views
-
Last post by The_Emperior5
-
- 1 Replies
- 710 Views
-
Last post by BlackRain
-
- 7 Replies
- 517 Views
-
Last post by galia
-
- 12 Replies
- 3247 Views
-
Last post by sahal80