World War III in Middle East?

The Arabman · Post by **The Arabman** » Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:32 pm

"geesinimada waa loo dhashaa"

Geesinimada looma dhasho; qofka waa la baraa ama lagu barbaariyaa. Hadalkaas oo kale waa hadal caqli yaraan ama caruureed.

xoogSADE14 · Post by **xoogSADE14** » Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:35 pm

^ adiga yaaba caqli kugu gaari kara eebe intuu abuuroo dhan adaa ugu garaad sareeyee

Ureysoo · Post by **Ureysoo** » Thu Jul 13, 2006 3:01 pm

War Dadkaan Bal Day. Atleast Arabs are fighting against other countries, but what about us Somalis who are assassinating each other? DonÂ’t make us a laughing stock, thus restrain from casting ruthless comments.

As 4 Palestinians, I donÂ’t think theyÂ’ll enhance the countryÂ’s current condition, nor that theyÂ’ll win the warfare against Israel in the meanwhile. On the other hand the whole Â“LevantÂ” area (Al-Shaam) in middle east (Syria, Jordon, and Lebanon) will be invaded by western countries just like Iraq. 2 the point where ppl who resides in Levant areas wonÂ’t be able 2 export or import goods. Western countries will practice callous course of actions against them, in which theyÂ’ll restrict food supply and financial fund from them. Compelling the poor countries 2 supply them with oil, while they are providing them with food (exchange in other term). Well, most of the countries in the middle east are abandoning Iraq and keeping them on a tight rein, not knowing that theyÂ’ll be invaded by the same country which marched into Iraqis land.

US is supporting Israel 4 political rationales and predispositions, since they are in the middle east 4 the same motive. Therefore, the rest of the Arab countries wonÂ’t get involved in fear of being labeled as rebellion countries...

*Much Esteem and Reverence*

*Bless*

gurey25 · Post by **gurey25** » Thu Jul 13, 2006 3:25 pm

nothing like a bunch of yahuud to get knorts in a twist.

cool down guys, isreal is the lord of the middle east,
they can do no wrong, and everything they do is justified.

if they shoot a toddler then it must have been the todlers fault, it
"hated thier freedom"
Laughing

Steeler [Crawler2] · Post by **Steeler [Crawler2]** » Thu Jul 13, 2006 4:25 pm

Gacalisa
I don't suppose it occurred to you that religion has almost no impact on modern western foreign policy. US foreign policy is devoted to Machiavelli, not Jesus Christ.

Arabman
The Arabs can't win. They can get a draw, best case. Nuclear weapons assure an outcome no better than that.

The Arabman · Post by **The Arabman** » Thu Jul 13, 2006 4:49 pm

Sure, secular Arabs can't win, but Islamists would decisively win. And like I said, nuclear warheads are for scaremongering, nothing more.

fagash_killer · Post by **fagash_killer** » Thu Jul 13, 2006 5:35 pm

arabman well said, those arab sissys arent that different than those warlords in somalia, the western country did first divided the arabs and they putted weak arab leaders who are now puppet leaders of them, just like c/yusuf is a puppet slave of the amxaaro, its just like that but why wont we see those arab citizens standing up and demonstrating, we only saw iranians who had the courage to stand up for these palastenians,shias waad dad rag wallahi , than some of those dumb sunnies, did you ever heard few kids who are part of the hezbollah blowing them self up no cuss they know who god is, unlike those dumb palastenians who are sending their kids to the battlefield, i dont see this as a long war as we the ummah are sleeping like ahmed said the muslim world could explode, those who said jeruzalem yes you got a point in that but if you look closer, those who got the power today like england, america,canada australia and some scandivian countries are all brothers and jews ore christians, if you look to their flag than you know what i mean, bush agreed what the isrealites did and since they own the world the world wont say any shit, aslong the arabs are quiet and i dont see that happing, thats why i said we need somethimes to put oure diin aside, we cant accept evrything of god, no matter how much we pray and the sitiuation is still the same, and besides thnx to that are we asking questions like why wont god help us, didnt god promised us victory and shit like that, god is testing us this is nothing else than a test, and we are 2 blind to see it, cuss we believe evryting what in the qoran stands, ore believing some stupid imams, but like i said the third world war wont come now but in the future, and thats near

fagash_killer · Post by **fagash_killer** » Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:22 pm

this is what some of those dumb arabs said

Muslim-Arab reaction

In the Muslim world, Malaysia - current chair of the 57-nation Organisation of the Islamic Conference - condemned Israel and urged the international community to take action.

In Tunis, an Arab anti-terrorism conference appealed for an immediate halt to the Israeli attacks and condemned what it called Israel's "state terrorism".

The International Committee of the Red Cross voiced concern about the plight of civilians caught up in the conflict and urged all sides to respect international law.

The violence is the worst between Israel and Lebanon since 1996 when Israeli troops still occupied part of the south.

and now read that of the western countries

France and Russia have condemned Israel's attacks on Lebanon, while the US described the offensive as Tel AvivÂ’s right to defend itself.

Russia and the European Union have condemned Israel's strikes in Lebanon but the US says Israel has the right to defend itself.

George Bush, the US president, spoke up for Israel's attack on Beirut airport, but warned the Israelis they should be careful not to weaken the fragile Lebanese government.

"Israel has the right to defend herself," Bush told a news conference after talks with Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor

Gacalisa · Post by **Gacalisa** » Thu Jul 13, 2006 7:42 pm

MAD MAC

I am aware of the things they tell people, and that is how they want things to bee, but the truth is religion has played a key role in the US and its policies.

eyes-only · Post by **eyes-only** » Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:08 pm

World war III? I doubt it. The Arabs are their own worst enemies. They support their enemies to attack their own brothers. It is just how they are programmed. They bow down to their oppressors. They are so used to it that it has become part of them. No matter how much a Somali person may dislike his brother, there is no way he would side with someone else against him. I guess they donÂ’t have the same culture. They welcome the Americans to use their countries to torture fellow Arabs and Muslims. The Palestinians are being terrorised daily and they do nothing. Instead of showing solidarity for their Lebanese brothers, they side with the enemy and criticise Syria (the only Arab country showing courage). This is not going to be a regional war because Israel is a bully and there is no power there to counter Israel since the international community supports Israel unconditionally and anyone opposing it is termed a terrorist.

Steeler [Crawler2] · Post by **Steeler [Crawler2]** » Fri Jul 14, 2006 1:44 am

"And like I said, nuclear warheads are for scaremongering, nothing more."

Arabman, normally this is true. BUT, it ceases to be true when a states survival is at stake. IF, and it's a big IF, the Arabs could truly unite under one leader (which of course would be facist, but that's another story) and they attacked Israel and actually could fight (that means investing REAL TIME AND ENERGY into weapon systems and training) and Israel felt it's survival was imperiled, the nukes would come off the shelf. Is that a surprise? Do you think if India attacked Pakistan and were about to seize Islamabad that Pakistan would hesistate to use nuclear weapons to protect themselves?

B-MAX · Post by **B-MAX** » Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:02 am

{{{War Dadkaan Bal Day. Atleast Arabs are fighting against other countries, but what about us Somalis who are assassinating each other? DonÂ’t make us a laughing stock, thus restrain from casting ruthless comments. }}}

Well said.
One FuckkHead said earlier that Arabs can't fight and they're women! He should've looked at his own situation first.

B-MAX · Post by **B-MAX** » Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:05 am

MAD MAC
Don't be that stupid.

Steeler [Crawler2] · Post by **Steeler [Crawler2]** » Fri Jul 14, 2006 6:24 am

B-Max
Great analysis. Genius.

The Arabman · Post by **The Arabman** » Fri Jul 14, 2006 7:43 am

"BUT, it ceases to be true when a states survival is at stake. IF, and it's a big IF, the Arabs could truly unite under one leader (which of course would be facist, but that's another story) and they attacked Israel and actually could fight (that means investing REAL TIME AND ENERGY into weapon systems and training) and Israel felt it's survival was imperiled, the nukes would come off the shelf."

Whether "IF", whether its "survival is at stake", the Zionist state can't and won't use nuclear warheads; it's impossible. I know that, you know it and others know it. But, you like to argue for the sake of argument, which is irrelevant.

SomaliNet Forums

FORUMS ARE BACK TO NORMAL - LIGHTNING FAST TOO

World War III in Middle East?