Welcome to SomaliNet Forums, a friendly and gigantic Somali centric active community. Login to hide this block

You are currently viewing this page as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, ask questions, educate others, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many, many other features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join SomaliNet forums today! Please note that registered members with over 50 posts see no ads whatsoever! Are you new to SomaliNet? These forums with millions of posts are just one section of a much larger site. Just visit the front page and use the top links to explore deep into SomaliNet oasis, Somali singles, Somali business directory, Somali job bank and much more. Click here to login. If you need to reset your password, click here. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

A Clash of Civilisation or a religious war?

Daily chitchat.

Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators

Forum rules
This General Forum is for general discussions from daily chitchat to more serious discussions among Somalinet Forums members. Please do not use it as your Personal Message center (PM). If you want to contact a particular person or a group of people, please use the PM feature. If you want to contact the moderators, pls PM them. If you insist leaving a public message for the mods or other members, it will be deleted.
OUR SPONSOR: LOGIN TO HIDE
User avatar
Endowed_Man
SomaliNetizen
SomaliNetizen
Posts: 729
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 7:00 pm
Location: Cal Madow

A Clash of Civilisation or a religious war?

Postby Endowed_Man » Sun Jul 24, 2005 4:00 pm

Today, most Muslims are indecisive, divided on the issue of the London Bombings. While most Muslims do express some sort of understanding for the bomber’s actions and motive for carrying out such deeds, they are still uncertain whether the bombers’ actions were justified or not. Were they or were they not?

Al Ghurabaa, a Muslim Group based in Britain is published in a newspaper to have said “Any Muslims that denies that terror is part of Islam is a Kafir” Many other Muslims claim that Islam prohibits one from showing any sympathy to the victims of Islamic terrorism.

While Abu Basir al-tartusi, a Syrian scholar published a Fatwa condemning the killings of innocent civilians and describing it as a “Disgraceful and shameful act, with no manhood, bravery or morality”

“We cannot approve it nor accept it and it is denied Islamically and politically” He added

Just as after 9/11, Muslims must now get used to some blurry policing and more insidiously the deadly looks of suspicion.

I believe the lack of unity in the Islamic community in Britain and throughout is the lack of comprehensive understanding and grasp of the Islamic Shari’ah and its teachings. And for some, such as the ones proclaiming that terrorism is a part of Islam, absolute lack of knowledge. Since when did Islam give one the right to kill another Muslim? Or an innocent human being?

Wa-Salaam

Kamal35
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 3939
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 7:00 pm
Location: Spain
Contact:

Postby Kamal35 » Sun Jul 24, 2005 4:23 pm

Great point, Endowed. Funny that we had the same idea at the same time. But I'm with you, my friend. I think it's not a clash of civilizations or cultures, but it's a clash of fanatics from a side against fanatics in the other side.

In the same way British people can't blame muslims for all what happened in London, muslim people can't blame Western people for what Bush did.

Bush is a new Hitler.
Bin Laden is a new Hitler too.

We can't allow 2 Hitlers to play with our lives.

Fucccck them.

Gandi
SomaliNetizen
SomaliNetizen
Posts: 599
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 10:04 pm

Postby Gandi » Sun Jul 24, 2005 4:40 pm

salaam kamal and endowed


as a new muslim , my knowledge about the religions is not great but iam

doing my best to learn about it, one thing that i believe is that islam does

not teach violence people get confused between culture and religion

for example if you look at the difference between turkians , somalians and

morocans. you know when i told my family i was becaming a muslim

they tought i was telling them that i was killing my self , you the

terrorist gave the islam a very bad name , and the westren media is

helping either , so its our duty to teach and show that Islam is

a relagion of peace and unity among us , and we need to think

different then people who live is the middel east cuz they dont deal

with other religion so they dont practice ( lakum diinakum willi yi diini)

wa salaam

User avatar
dhuusa_deer
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 8152
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:13 pm
Location: Canada

Postby dhuusa_deer » Sun Jul 24, 2005 6:35 pm

This is NOT clash of civilisations but clash of civilised world vs the barbarians.

But what troubles me is the prevalence and tolerance shown to the 'but' and 'if' terrorists apologisers and chamberlians. This appeasement fraternity brotherhood of muslims and idealist kafirs charge out of their cigar smoking, capuccino sucking, Islam-is-peaceful-religion orating sessions, after each barbaric act, to tell us that the West is to blame. Fifty ppl died BUT 100 died last week in Baghdad. The terrorists will stop their campaign IF the Brits get out of Iraq. As if that is the reason.

In a free and democratic nation like Britian, disgruntled individuals have various PEACEFUL avenues to state their grievances. They could've protested the British government involvment in Iraq war if that is the reason for their violence. They could set up political party catering to muslim interests. Open media outlets airing their grievances. Have the aid of independent legal system protects theirs rights to all these freedoms. The list is endless. But their method of protest is cold-blooded slaughtering of civilians. What does this tell us?

It tell us that these terrorists are not protesting about any particular issue. Thier goal is to kill and kill as many as they can. They have no morality and don't care about the backlash muslims will face as a result of their activities. They care for NO ONE but for their evil plans. Such ppl can't be excused, sympathised or negotiated with. Only resolutely opposed and faught. Otherwise they'll destroy everything we care for.

Wise-Man
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 7:00 pm
Location: Arlington

Postby Wise-Man » Sun Jul 24, 2005 9:10 pm

[quote=End-Man]"Al Ghurabaa, a Muslim Group based in Britain is published in a newspaper to have said “Any Muslims that denies that terror is part of Islam is a Kafir” Many other Muslims claim that Islam prohibits one from showing any sympathy to the victims of Islamic terrorism.

While Abu Basir al-tartusi, a Syrian scholar published a Fatwa condemning the killings of innocent civilians and describing it as a “Disgraceful and shameful act, with no manhood, bravery or morality”

“We cannot approve it nor accept it and it is denied Islamically and politically” He added.

Well, this is not just the lack of unity in the Muslim community in Britain. It has something to do with the whole nation of Islam and how they contradict and disagree from one another. This kind of contradiction and calling kufars to each other is really something that has no place in Islam. Muslim scholars are divided into groups and sects and none of them tries to protect and save this bewildered nation. Some of them are under dictatorship leaders and their actions and steps are under control. There are group of Muslims (They could be some people who trying to defame Islam) who claim the responsibility of every bomb that explodes these days.

This confusion also gave a chance for some people to think the only reason to revenge against kufaars is bombing an innocent people. It is kind of fitnah and this fitnah will never only affect to the people who does wrong, but it might also afflict all of us. See, that is really what is happening right now. As we know Muslims are being targeted after those attacks. They are insecure and even some might not try to dress as a Muslim. Tell me, what those people gained? They just sabotaged everything. Why Muslim scholars can’t unite wherever they are and appoint a supreme leader without dealing any political aspects?
Last edited by Wise-Man on Sun Jul 24, 2005 9:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Viking
SomaliNetizen
SomaliNetizen
Posts: 705
Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Valhalla

Postby Viking » Sun Jul 24, 2005 9:13 pm

"This is NOT clash of civilisations but clash of civilised world vs the barbarians."

I guess those who use cluster bombs are the civilised while the ones who use home-made devices are the barbarians. Let's hope the "barbarians" acquire some 'advanced weapons' they can drop from 30 000 feet so that they can deserve the adjective "civilised".

surria
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 1480
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 4:28 pm

Postby surria » Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:56 pm

The Harvard political scientist professor Samuel P. Huntington has established a theoretical context for this idea of the "clash of civilizations", in which western academia tries to attempt to justify the concept of an unfathomable Islam-West divide and a new, inevitable cold war with Islam. Huntington’s thesis builds upon a long tradition of Western political animosity, motivated by geosrategic interests in the Middle East. Such animosity, it seems, is justified by repeated reference to the intrinsically violent character of the "Other", in this case. "Islam". This ideological duality between the intrinsically superior civilization of the West and the intrinsically bestial civilization of the "other" is not a new phenomenon in international relations, but rather build upon a longstanding tradition of warmongering.

Huntington has used the power of discourse perfectly here, and by discourse I mean, the formations of language in which Europe began to describe and represent the difference between itself and these "Others".


----
In his book Orientalism, Edward Said analyzes the various discourses and institutions which constructed and produced, as an object of knowledge, that entity called “the Orient” Said calls this discourse “orientalism.” So, I highly recommend this book, before any of you swallow this “clash of civilizations” crap.

User avatar
Endowed_Man
SomaliNetizen
SomaliNetizen
Posts: 729
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 7:00 pm
Location: Cal Madow

Postby Endowed_Man » Mon Jul 25, 2005 3:52 pm

Kamal, greetings my friend. Most muslims feel that bombings in london will not cease untill hope is restored for the poor Iraqi civilians and British and Amercian "Crusaders" relinquish their rather Impetuous endeavour of conquering all. Britain is now given a taste of its own medicine and is noticeably 'relishing' the waft of anxeity and fear in their own homes. Eventhough, in my opinion, the killings of those innocent civilians were not justified, these attacks were bound to happen, inevitably. Prejudice against Islam and muslims has been rife since 9/11 and now as clearly manifested by the hundreds of National front prostestors in Regent mosque recently and the killing of the many innocent Muslims as well as the Brazilian electrician shot dead without it being investigation-based. The british government brough this upon itself, and must now garner the detriment.

Dhuusa-Dheer, Clearly, you have lost your fingertip grip on reality and have descended into an abyss of irreversible lunacy, please go adn defacate somewhere else. thank You!

Wise-man, the perpetrators are clearly mistaken on this one. Revenge does not mean killing innocent civilians or rather "soft" targets. these people were simply on their way to earn a livelihood for the wives and children or families. the reason for this is again Lack of understanding Islam. Islam never gave anyone the permission to kill as he pleases, infact this kind of act is totally forbidden because as it comes under "Fasaadan Fil-Ard" which is punishable either by amputation or death.

may Allah forgive me if i have Erred!
Wa-Salaam

Wise-Man
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 7:00 pm
Location: Arlington

Postby Wise-Man » Mon Jul 25, 2005 4:12 pm

Endowed_Man, i totally agree with you in here brother. You know what it is about time Muslims to use their own brain instead of Ak-47 or suicide bombings. This world has become more dangerous then it used to be. It seems we are not focusing the right way we were suppose to face when we are trying to handle this kind of situation. I just wonder who is gonna save this confused Ummah Rolling Eyes Seef-laboodnimo is the biggest problem we have i guess.

surria
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 1480
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 4:28 pm

Postby surria » Mon Jul 25, 2005 4:28 pm

si dee bay umaha u wareersanyahiin, markii la soo waararo, ma waxaad rabtaa in ay iska fadhiyaan. Rolling Eyes

Steeler [Crawler2]
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 12405
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2001 7:00 pm

Postby Steeler [Crawler2] » Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:52 am

Viking
As usual you totally miss the point. In one case, we have cluster bombs targetting enemy combatants. In the other, we have suicide bombers deliberately attacking non-combatants. These things aren't comparable. One is state sponsored. You know who to hold responsible. They are your political leaders. There is recourse to address state sponsored violence.

The other is accountable to no one. They hide in the shadows. They require no mandate. In Bagdhad they are killing their fellow Muslims with abandon. Even if we pull out, they won't stop. In fact, if we pull out the Muslim on Muslim violence will get worse. You know this.

If Muslims want to live in Europe without being regarded with suspicion (at best) or totally ostracized and suffer mass deportations (at worst) then they have to deal with this issue. In Europe, America and elsewhere, violence is the purview of the state. Muslims have yet to embrace the idea that violence is the purview of the state. That's why Islamic violence is out of control. People like you rationalize it without thinking through the consequences. What happened in Somalia will happen throughout the Islamic world when the snakes get rid of their primary adversaries (if they do) and begin to fall upon each other.

THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR NON-STATE VIOLENCE. INDIVIDUALS DO NOT HAVE LEGITIMACY BY INVOKING RELIGION. THE STATE IS THE FINAL WORD ON VIOLENCE, NOT THE QUR'AN.

Until Muslims get this basic concept through their rag-covered little heads, they will continue to live in violent socieites. And it won't take all that much longer for us to deport your assess back to the deserts from whence they came and you can kill each other with abandon.

If I said it once, I said it a thousand times, if you continue to allow terrorists to operate in your midst, then we will have to deal with that. And you won't like how we do that. If the Ummah continues to villify and fight the west, the west will destroy you.

Kamal35
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 3939
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 7:00 pm
Location: Spain
Contact:

Postby Kamal35 » Tue Jul 26, 2005 4:24 am

Good analysis, Mad Mac. But there's a point in which I disagree. You will remind that, before the war on Iraq started, I warned: "It's going to be like stirring up a hornet's nest". That's what actually is happening. For years, there was a great sense of humilliation in the muslim world for years of colonialism, manipulation in the Arab countries, corruption, undercover operations to put and pull out presidents or kings and the Iraq issue was the last straw, even here in the West. The arrogancy of Bush and his neo-cons in Washington, his lack of sensivity, his sense of superiority was too much for the people all around the world. That way of saying "God bless America" and all that shit was really annoying. And stupid.

I think nobody here felt any symphathy to Saddam Hussein, like I don't feel any symphathy for Fidel Castro or Gadaffi. But one thing is the dictator who's ruling a country and one completly different thing is that country itself, the people of that country. And you can't blame a country for what its president is doing or not. The war in Iraq, more than a mistake, a whole mistake, was an UNJUSTICE against the Iraqi people. You know me and you know how hard I worked with the Iraqi children. I heard their stories, I saw their tears and I got really angry against Bush. And I'm Western and Spanish. Just imagine what a muslim could feel.

This feeling of anger against unjustice has been used by the fanatics in order to implant the chaos. You're completly right about they're working in the shadow. They have their own hidden agenda which is nothing but creating a great mess in order to fight their personal and crazy Satan, their own particular ghosts which have nothing to do with the real world, but all those fairy tales about the 72 virgins and rivers of wine in the Paradise. Nothing to do with common life. I don't think their muslims: they're just mad men, insane men, who should be jailed in a psychiatric.

A muslim friend of mine told me once that, after the war in Iraq, those muslims who were moderate, became less moderate; those one who were conservative, became more conservative; those one who were a little bit fanatic, became real fanatic, and those ones who were real fanatics, became terrorists. That's why I think that, if the situation remains the same, with USA kicking Iraq day in day out, this is gonna end with fanatics fighting fanatics of all sides, with terrorist attacks in Rome, Berlin, Paris, Barcelona or Kuala Lumpur. It doesn't matter where: fanatics all over the place. And with fanatics burning mosques in London or Leeds, or killing someone because he looks like an Arab.

The thing is going to get worse with the days, because, as you say, the Western World is not going to stand peaceful if more terrorist attacks happen. I don't understand what's happening in London: after the attacks in Madrid, nobody blamed the muslim community for what happened: we blamed the terrorists. Muslim people offered themselves to work with the police as translators, confidents, gave their assistance to the Spanish intelligence. What you can't do is to blame a whole community for what only a few, very few, did. But if it happens once and again, the people here is going to feel as angry as muslim people all around the world feels, and this gonna be a mess.

I read here that if a Western dared to visit Somalia, he would inmediately killed. And the guy who said this was proud of it.

I can't imagine what can happen if, here, in the West, we reach to the same mentality. The extermination champs again.

That's what those fanatics want Europe to become: a Hitlerian State again in order to tell their fellow people: "Don't you see, here's the proof that the West is the Great Satan".

The old terrorist shit of Action-Reaction-Action.

But this time, Mad, Bush has his part in the Action-Reaction-Action chain.

User avatar
Basra-
SomaliNet Super
SomaliNet Super
Posts: 49034
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 7:00 pm
Location: Somewhere far, far, far away from you forumers.

Postby Basra- » Tue Jul 26, 2005 5:24 am

This is just a waste of time.A clash of civilisation or a religious war??? The topic is not at all appropriate.Terrorism has nothing to do with civilisation or religion.The ones calling themselves civilised have no concept of the what to be civil is--the religious zealouts certainly DONT have Islam in their priority list.

This is just a clash of political war-a cowboy vs red indians sort of a war-where the powerful institution with machines that 'Dhuuso' calls 'civilised' are the 'cowboys' & the less sophisicated indignant chaps with bombs are the red indians.(although Viking did give Dhuuso a perfect sensible answer.However that doesn't mean i agree with viking either.The two are just team members of the two opposing parties & who will NEVER be flexible to think objectively.That is why i say this arguements are a waste of time).Both parties are wrong.Both parties are greedy.Both parties are delluded to think they are right.Both parties hide their outrageous crime under a delicate silk lavender bed sheet :The Cowboy's bed shiit is called --Democracy' & The red indians Shiit is called--- Islam!!



So what is the potential profits in this propaganda???


Both parties are sure to gather a flock of sheep to follow them.Of course the sheeps genuinely believe in the respectives delicate lavender bed shiit's--or more politely---causes.(i.e the sheeps really do believe in Democracy & Islam-sadly they are trapped in political manueverings)-But Alas- the actual---doers'---i.e the cowboys & indians----those ones are the ones with the last laugh.

Sadly.........



We the innocent sheeps with our prada bags---have the last --cry---aboard the express train station en route to HELL!!!!! . Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad
Last edited by Basra- on Tue Jul 26, 2005 6:08 am, edited 3 times in total.

Kamal35
SomaliNet Heavyweight
SomaliNet Heavyweight
Posts: 3939
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 7:00 pm
Location: Spain
Contact:

Postby Kamal35 » Tue Jul 26, 2005 5:50 am

That's the point, Basra. You hit the head of the nail. I couldn't say it better. As always, great point. You, both living in the States and being muslim, has the best info to understand what is the bad thing of both sides.

Congrats. Brilliant as always. That's the reason you're the Queen of Somalinet. Smile

Viking
SomaliNetizen
SomaliNetizen
Posts: 705
Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Valhalla

Postby Viking » Tue Jul 26, 2005 8:54 am

Mad Mac,
The difference between you and I is that; I'm against ALL forms of violence against innocent civilians while you support state-terrorism. You are paid and live your life to perpetrate these evil acts. Since your "morals" are dictated to you by the military, you have lost the sense of distinguishing betwen right and wrong. This is why you have a difficulty accepting the non-state actors, you feel that the state has a monopoly on violence and killing.


OUR SPONSOR: LOGIN TO HIDE

Hello, Has your question been answered on this page? We hope yes. If not, you can start a new thread and post your question(s). It is free to join. You can also search our over a million pages (just scroll up and use our site-wide search box) or browse the forums.

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “General - General Discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests