Moderators: Moderators, Junior Moderators



we already know that what elseif i was a somali,i would want to be an isaaq they seem to be the most peaceful,progressive and development oriented and the leas qabilistic.


if i was a somali,i would want to be an isaaq they seem to be the most peaceful,progressive and development oriented and the leas qabilistic.

if i was a somali,i would want to be an isaaq they seem to be the most peaceful,progressive and development oriented and the leas qabilistic.
If you were Somali you would be a bantu who knows his place and never get involves in Somali affairs.if i was a somali,i would want to be an isaaq they seem to be the most peaceful,progressive and development oriented and the leas qabilistic.


How can he be right when he is a bantu?He is right we are the least Qabilistic Somalis and the most progressive

How can he be right when he is a bantu?He is right we are the least Qabilistic Somalis and the most progressive
Isn't that a contradiction in term?

For a bantu to be right will defeat the whole purpose of bantu-ismHow can he be right when he is a bantu?He is right we are the least Qabilistic Somalis and the most progressive
Isn't that a contradiction in term?![]()
![]()
are you saying bantus are always incorrect
So, you're saying being in clan and loving clans are like worshipping the elders of clan? That's shirk :OSomalis belong to several clans. When you look closely, the clan concept in somalia is an elusive one. It is like an invisible god. Just like St Clause out there to be worshiped. Its power and influence is usually exaggerated by the low lives; armchair politicians, newly urbanised somalis, the uneducated, the passive folks who would rather live in a bubble, the less intelligent and a few political entrepreneurs who view it as a way to get around and live a life of bounty at the behest of our people. Unfortunately, there are a number of somalis and so called non-somali pseudo intellectuals who give this god the credit it does not command.
The so called Hawiyes could be viewed by the daroods and some rahanweins as savages but within them there is a strong hatred. If the Hawiyas were as tribalists as many non-hawiyes portray them, they would be one of the strongest regions; You are talking about the heartland of somalis. But, the hawiye lad or lass is not generally tribalistic; they are at loggerheads with each other and the sub-clan level. Bare early 1990s, there is no movement called hawiyism. Instead, the Habargedir sa'ad views the habargedir saleeban as enemy number 1. The Waceysle abgaal view the daud as enermy nr. e1 etc.
The daroods too are not homogenous; bare the discourse of the 1990s there is virtually nothing that unites them. The uniting factor of being persecuted by Hawiye in the south and Isaaq in the north lacked potency in the middle of the 1990s when the hawiyes turned against each other. Nowadays, what you have is a process that looks like the hawiye situation; Ogaden vs Marehans, Majeerten vs Mareehans, Marehans against other marehans, warsangeli against majerteen; even the more peaceful xir ( Lelkase) is involved in a fight.
The Rahwanweins; as above.
The Isaqs have succeeded in keeping a social cohesion; but come recognition they will be at each other's throats.
What this show is the shifting dynamics of tribalism; it is only confined to websites and used by people who do not think!

Return to “General - General Discussions”
Users browsing this forum: nnjrewzas112 and 7 guests