Postby Mowhawk » Thu Sep 15, 2005 9:39 am
[quote="MAD MAC"]I'm not justifying the Iraq campagin. Anyone who was on this net in 03 knows I was against it. But that isn't the point. The point is, it was warfare between nation states, which is legitimate. Terror campaigns by non-state actors is not legitimate. It's as simple as that.[/quote]
Mad
Non state actors like GWB and the Saudi govt?
I remember that you were against the invassion of Iraq, and supported only because of your fellow American soldiers in Iraq. I think we both made the same conclussion that Israel would have gained more of the deal. It didn't happen that way, but when most people in the globe now, including large non-military Americans disregard that war to be illegal, what is the use of the defination, or you mentioning the notion of nation-states and Laws considering to go to war? Is it due to the U.N's presence in New York? The U.S is the only super-power nation in the world, and it's behaviour in Iraq constitutes globally to be an illegal war. If you didn't like the Iraqi war, then you have to admit that is a glimpse of their policy. Where America acts illegally in the U.N, and that will only attract the largest audience in protest, including Americans, Europeans and others. Violence will only attract violence. Two Illegals don't make it right.
